Cited by 49Sleep and related disordersSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Pharmacoepidemiological characterisation of zolpidem and zopiclone usage

Victorri-Vigneau, Caroline, Feuillet, F., Wainstein, L., Grall-Bronnec, M., Pivette, J., Chaslerie, A., Sébille, V., Jolliet, P.·2013·European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

Purpose Zolpidem and zopiclone are two widely used non-benzodiazepine hypnotics whose usage seems to be associated to pharmacodependence. However, to our knowledge, there has as yet been no published epidemiological study which has compared their abuse or dependence potential. We used a pharmacoepidemiological approach to identify and characterise zolpidem and zopiclone users in real life situations.Methods Regular users of zolpidem or zopiclone were identified in the database of a French regional health insurance organisation. A latent class analysis (LCA) was used to identify different subgroups of users of these two hypnotics.Results The study cohort comprised 25,168 patients who regularly used zolpidem and 21,860 who regularly used zopiclone. The results of the latent class analysis, which enables subgroups with similar patterns of response to be identified, revealed four clinical subtypes of users of zolpidem: non-problematic users, users with associations with hypnotics/anxiolytics or with associated mental disorders, and problematic users. Only three subgroups were identified for zopiclone, and LCA did not discriminate a special class of problematic users for this drug.Conclusion Our analysis indicates that there is a subclass of zolpidem user suggestive of abuse; this was not the case for zopiclone. This methodology is very interesting because it allows analysis of databases and determination of a specific signature of drugs potentially leading to abuse or dependence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00228-013-1557-x

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Victorri-Vigneau, C., Feuillet, F., Wainstein, L., Grall-Bronnec, M., Pivette, J., Chaslerie, A., Sébille, V., & Jolliet, P.
Affiliations
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes (FR)
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Published
2013-07-23
Volume
69
Issue
11
Pages
1965-1972
ISSN
  • 0031-6970 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1041
OpenAlex
W1976566286
Cited by
49
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6
FWCI
7.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
zolpidem, zopiclone, non-benzodiazepine hypnotics, hypnotic abuse, hypnotic dependence, problematic drug use, latent class analysis, user subgroups, anxiolytic use, mental illness, health insurance claims data
MeSH terms
Zolpidem, Aged, Drug Utilization, Female, France, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Male, Middle Aged, Piperazines, Pyridines, Substance-Related Disorders, Azabicyclo Compounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review