Cited by 18Diabetes Management and ResearchPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug ReactionsBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

The Relationship between Risk of Hypoglycemia and Use of Cibenzoline and Disopyramide

Takada, M., Fujita, S., Katayama, Y., Harano, Y., Shibakawa, M.·2000·European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

Objective A case-control study was carried out to compare the risks of hypoglycemia caused by disopyramide and cibenzoline. Methods We selected 91 subjects with hypoglycemia from among 14,156 outpatients who consulted the National Cardiovascular Center (NCVC) and received drug therapy between September 1997 and February 1998. We used the fasting blood sugar (FBS) level of 75 mg/dl or less as the cut-off level to screen for hypoglycemia. For each case, five controls matched for gender and age were selected from the clinical division consulted by relevant subjects. Results Ninety-one cases and 455 controls were enrolled in this study. Of 91 cases with hypoglycemia, 8 (8.8%) were treated with cibenzoline and 3 (3.3%) with disopyramide. The percentage of cases treated with cibenzoline was greater than that in the controls (1.5%), and the prescription frequency of cibenzoline during the study period was 2%. With adjustment for potential confounding factors using conditional logistic regression, hypoglycemia was significantly correlated with the use of cibenzoline [OR 8.0 (95% CI 1.7-36.8)], insulin [OR 48.4 (95% CI 8.8-267.2)], and thyroid agents [OR 13.0 (95% CI 1.1-160.4)]. An increased risk of hypoglycemia associated with the use of sulfonylureas was not detected. In additional logistic regression analysis, including the variables with individual sulfonylureas, glibenclamide but not gliclazide significantly increased the risk of hypoglycemia. The use of disopyramide did not aff…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s002280000136

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Takada, M., Fujita, S., Katayama, Y., Harano, Y., & Shibakawa, M.
Affiliations
National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center (JP)
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Published
2000-07-19
Volume
56
Issue
4
Pages
335-342
ISSN
  • 0031-6970 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1041
OpenAlex
W2052018231
Cited by
18
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
hypoglycemia, cibenzoline, disopyramide, drug-induced hypoglycemia, beta-blockers, sulfonylureas, glibenclamide, gliclazide, insulin, diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anti-Arrhythmia Agents, Blood Glucose, Disopyramide, Fasting, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Imidazoles, Male, Middle Aged, Sulfonylurea Compounds, Logistic Models, Case-Control Studies, Potassium Channel Blockers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review