Cited by 18Cerebrovascular and genetic disordersGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesHereditary Neurological Disorders

Diagnosing CADASIL using MRI: evidence from families with known mutations of Notch 3 gene

Chawda, S. J., De Lange, R. P. J., Hourihan, M. D., Halpin, S. F. S., St. Clair, D.·2000·Neuroradiology

Abstract

Clinical data and MRI findings are presented on 18 subjects from two families with neuropathologically confirmed CADASIL. DNA analysis revealed mutations in exon 4 of Notch 3 gene in both families. All family members with mutations in Notch 3 gene had extensive abnormalities on MRI, principally lesions in the white matter of the frontal lobes and in the external capsules. Of several family members in whom a diagnosis of CADASIL was suspected on the basis of minor symptoms, one had MRI changes consistent with CADASIL; none of these cases carried a mutation in the Notch 3 gene. MRI and clinical features that may alert the radiologist to the diagnosis of CADASIL are reviewed. However, a wide differential diagnosis exists for the MRI appearances of CADASIL, including multiple sclerosis and small-vessel disease secondary to hypertension. The definitive diagnosis cannot be made on MRI alone and requires additional evidence, where available, from a positive family history and by screening DNA for mutations of Notch 3 gene.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s002340050880

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anterior temporal lobe involvement on MRI is highly specific and can distinguish CADASIL from other conditions.

    “Previous evidence suggests that anterior temporal lobe involvement on MR images is highly specific and allows for distinguishing CADASIL from other conditions [1, 2, 10, 27, 43, 52, 54, 64, 68–70, 76].”
  • External capsule lesions have been proposed as a potential diagnostic feature of CADASIL, but they occur in a lower proportion of patients and have lower diagnostic specificity.

    “The presence of lesions in the external capsule has also been proposed as a potential diagnostic feature of CADASIL [1, 3, 9, 10, 43, 52, 54, 58, 64, 65, 76], although it has been reported in a lower proportion of patients and has been associated with a lower diagnostic specificity [69].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chawda, S. J., De Lange, R. P. J., Hourihan, M. D., Halpin, S. F. S., & St. Clair, D.
Affiliations
  • Royal London Hospital (GB)
  • University Hospital of Wales (GB)
Venue
Neuroradiology
Published
2000-04-19
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
249-255
ISSN
  • 0028-3940 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1920
OpenAlex
W2094739807
Cited by
18
References
26
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroradiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Cerebrovascular and genetic disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Hereditary Neurological Disorders
Keywords
CADASIL, cerebral small vessel disease, NOTCH3 gene mutation, familial cerebral small vessel disease, white matter lesions, frontal lobe, external capsule, MRI diagnosis, differential diagnosis, multiple sclerosis, genetic screening
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Cerebral Cortex, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Pedigree, Dementia, Multi-Infarct, Mutation, Missense

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review