Cited by 14Evolution and Paleontology StudiesEvolution and Genetic DynamicsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Implications of Fluctuations in Substitution Rates: Impact on the Uncertainty of Branch Lengths and on Relative-Rate Tests

Bickel, David R.·2000·Journal of Molecular Evolution

Abstract

Many tests of the lineage dependence of substitution rates, computations of the error of evolutionary distances, and simulations of molecular evolution assume that the rate of evolution is constant in time within each lineage descended from a common ancestor. However, estimates of the index of dispersion of numbers of mammalian substitutions suggest that the rate has time-dependent variations consistent with a fractal-Gaussian-rate Poisson process, which assumes common descent without assuming rate constancy. While this model does not affect certain relative-rate tests, it substantially increases the uncertainty of branch lengths. Thus, fluctuations in the rate of substitution cannot be neglected in calculations that rely on evolutionary distances, such as the confidence intervals of divergence times and certain phylogenetic reconstructions. The fractal-Gaussian-rate Poisson process is compared and contrasted with previous models of molecular evolution, including other Poisson processes, the fractal renewal process, a Lévy-stable process, a fractional-difference process, and a log-Brownian process. The fractal models are more compatible with mammalian data than the nonfractal models considered, and they may also be better supported by Darwinian theory. Although the fractal-Gaussian-rate Poisson process has not been proven to have better agreement with data or theory than the other fractal models, its Gaussian nature simplifies the exploration of its impact on evolutionary distance errors and relative-rate tests.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s002399910041

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Observations indicate that the pattern of substitution intervals for many genes has a broader distribution, which might be described as an 'overdispersed' Poisson distribution.

    “In fact, the molecular clock is generally even sloppier: observations indicate that the pattern of substitution intervals for many genes has a broader distribution, which might be described as an 'overdispersed' Poisson distribution 11,13,14 .”

    From The modern molecular clock (2003) · cites this paper as [13]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bickel, D. R.
Affiliations
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Corresponding author
Bickel, David R.
Venue
Journal of Molecular Evolution
Published
2000-04
Volume
50
Issue
4
Pages
381-390
ISSN
0022-2844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W9630392
Cited by
14
References
1
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Molecular Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
substitution rate variation, relative rate tests, divergence time estimation, phylogenetic inference, stable Lévy processes, dispersion index
MeSH terms
Animals, Mathematics, Models, Genetic, Genetic Variation, Poisson Distribution, Evolution, Molecular, Amino Acid Substitution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review