Cited by 273Soil and Unsaturated FlowSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil Management and Crop Yield

Three-dimensional Microorganization of the Soil–Root–Microbe System

Feeney, Debbie S., Crawford, John W., Daniell, Tim, Hallett, Paul D., Nunan, Naoise, Ritz, Karl, Rivers, Mark, Young, Iain M.·2006·Microbial Ecology

Abstract

Soils contain the greatest reservoir of biodiversity on Earth, and the functionality of the soil ecosystem sustains the rest of the terrestrial biosphere. This functionality results from complex interactions between biological and physical processes that are strongly modulated by the soil physical structure. Using a novel combination of biochemical and biophysical indicators and synchrotron microtomography, we have discovered that soil microbes and plant roots microengineer their habitats by changing the porosity and clustering properties (i.e., spatial correlation) of the soil pores. Our results indicate that biota act to significantly alter their habitat toward a more porous, ordered, and aggregated structure that has important consequences for functional properties, including transport processes. These observations support the hypothesis that the soil-plant-microbe complex is self-organized.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00248-006-9062-8

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feeney, D. S., Crawford, J. W., Daniell, T., Hallett, P. D., Nunan, N., Ritz, K., Rivers, M., & Young, I. M.
Affiliations
  • Abertay University (GB)
  • James Hutton Institute (GB)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Cranfield University (GB)
  • Argonne National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Young, Iain M.
Venue
Microbial Ecology
Published
2006-05-06
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
151-158
ISSN
  • 0095-3628 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-184X
OpenAlex
W2085638849
Cited by
273
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 13
FWCI
46.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Microbial Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EPubDev Repository (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
  • RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Soil and Unsaturated Flow
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
Keywords
plant-soil-microbe interactions, soil pore structure, soil porosity, plant roots, soil structure, self-organization, transport phenomena, soil aggregation, synchrotron microtomography
MeSH terms
Fungi, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Lolium, Soil, Soil Microbiology, Porosity, Ecosystem, Bacterial Physiological Phenomena, Plant Roots, Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review