Cited by 12Protein Structure and DynamicsProtein purification and stabilityProtein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis

Diversity of hydrodynamic radii of intrinsically disordered proteins

Open access
Białobrzewski, Michał K., Klepka, Barbara P., Michaś, Agnieszka, Cieplak-Rotowska, Maja K., Staszałek, Zuzanna, Niedźwiecka, Anna·2023·European Biophysics Journal

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) form an important class of biomolecules regulating biological processes in higher organisms. The lack of a fixed spatial structure facilitates them to perform their regulatory functions and allows the efficiency of biochemical reactions to be controlled by temperature and the cellular environment. From the biophysical point of view, IDPs are biopolymers with a broad configuration state space and their actual conformation depends on non-covalent interactions of its amino acid side chain groups at given temperature and chemical conditions. Thus, the hydrodynamic radius ( R h ) of an IDP of a given polymer length (N) is a sequence- and environment-dependent variable. We have reviewed the literature values of hydrodynamic radii of IDPs determined experimentally by SEC, AUC, PFG NMR, DLS, and FCS, and complement them with our FCS results obtained for a series of protein fragments involved in the regulation of human gene expression. The data collected herein show that the values of hydrodynamic radii of IDPs can span the full space between the folded globular and denatured proteins in the R h ( N ) diagram.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00249-023-01683-8

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Białobrzewski, M. K., Klepka, B. P., Michaś, A., Cieplak-Rotowska, M. K., Staszałek, Z., & Niedźwiecka, A.
Affiliations
Institute of Physics (PL)
Venue
European Biophysics Journal
Published
2023-10
Volume
52
Issue
6-7
Pages
607-618
ISSN
  • 0175-7571 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1017
OpenAlex
W4387599617
Cited by
12
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Biophysics Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Narodowe Centrum Nauki (UMO-2016/22/E/NZ1/00656)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis
Keywords
intrinsically disordered proteins, hydrodynamic radius, protein conformation, sequence-dependent conformation, temperature dependence, non-covalent interactions, protein fragments, gene expression regulation
MeSH terms
Humans, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Protein Conformation, Radius, Temperature, Hydrodynamics, Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review