Cited by 10Abdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsRenal and Vascular PathologiesVascular anomalies and interventions

The radiologist’s guide to duplex ultrasound assessment of chronic mesenteric ischemia

Revzin, Margarita V., Pellerito, John S., Nezami, Nariman, Moshiri, Mariam·2020·Abdominal Radiology

Abstract

Objective This article reviews the relevant anatomy and physiology of the mesenteric vasculature, familiarizes the radiologist with the accepted diagnostic criteria for mesenteric artery stenosis and its role in the diagnosis of chronic mesenteric ischemia, describes Doppler imaging techniques, and provides protocols for the assessment and surveillance of the mesenteric vasculature before and after revascularization. It also discusses expected changes following revascularization and reviews common post-procedural complications. Results Duplex sonography plays an important role in the diagnosis and management of chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI). Establishing a successful diagnosis is dependent upon knowledge of mesenteric arterial anatomy and physiology as well as sufficient expertise in image optimization and scanning techniques. Although there has been a trend toward utilization of other noninvasive [computed tomographic angiography (CTA), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), and invasive (digital subtraction angiography (DSA)] imaging modalities for assessment of the mesenteric vasculature, a new era of "imaging wisely" raises legitimate concerns about the effects of ionizing radiation as well as potential effects of CT and MR contrast agents. These concerns are obviated by the use of ultrasound, and recently developed techniques, such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound and vascular applications focused on the evaluation of slow flow, have revealed the vast potential of vascular ultrasound in the evaluation of chronic mesenteric ischemia. Conclusion Duplex sonography is a cost-effective and powerful tool that can be utilized for the accurate assessment of mesenteric vascular pathology, specifically mesenteric arterial stenosis, and for the evaluation of mesenteric arterial system post revascularization.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00261-019-02165-2

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Revzin, M. V., Pellerito, J. S., Nezami, N., & Moshiri, M.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Northwell Health (US)
  • University of Washington Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Revzin, Margarita V.
  • Moshiri, Mariam
Venue
Abdominal Radiology
Published
2019-08-13
Volume
45
Issue
10
Pages
2960-2979
ISSN
  • 2366-004X (ISSN-L)
  • 2366-0058
OpenAlex
W2967100584
Cited by
10
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Abdominal Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Renal and Vascular Pathologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Vascular anomalies and interventions
Keywords
chronic mesenteric ischemia, mesenteric artery stenosis, duplex ultrasound, Doppler imaging, mesenteric revascularization, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, slow flow, diagnostic criteria
MeSH terms
Radiologists, Humans, Ischemia, Angiography, Digital Subtraction, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex, Mesenteric Ischemia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review