Cited by 37Abdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsVascular anomalies and interventionsRenal and Vascular Pathologies

The influence of respiration on criteria for transabdominal duplex examination of the splanchnic arteries in patients with suspected chronic splanchnic ischemia

Open access
van Petersen, André S., Meerwaldt, Robbert, Kolkman, Jeroen J., Huisman, Ad B., van der Palen, Job, van Bockel, J. Hajo, Zeebregts, Clark J., Geelkerken, Robert H.·2013·Journal of Vascular Surgery

Abstract

Background Duplex ultrasound imaging of the mesenteric vessels is often used as a first diagnostic tool to evaluate the mesenteric circulation in patients with unexplained chronic abdominal symptoms. Several studies on duplex criteria have been published; however, most studies are small and included not exclusively patients with symptoms suggestive of chronic mesenteric syndrome (CMS). This study evaluated the contribution of respiration-monitored duplex ultrasound imaging in the diagnosis of stenosis or occlusion of the mesenteric arteries in patients suspected of CMS and thereby improves the definition of the criteria for stenosis. Methods Between 1999 and 2007, 779 consecutive patients presented to our tertiary referral center for evaluation and treatment of CMS. Mesenteric artery duplex ultrasound imaging and angiography of the abdominal aorta and its branches were performed in 324 patients. Angiography was considered the gold standard for verifying the presence or absence of arterial pathology. Results from duplex imaging and angiography were compared to determine the optimal duplex criteria for stenosis. In addition, the contribution of expiration and inspiration on duplex imaging and angiography were established. Results Significantly higher peak systolic and end-diastolic velocities were found in the celiac artery (CA) and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) during expiration than during inspiration. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses found respiration-dependent cutoff values for CA and SMA stenosis. The values corresponding with the highest accuracy (minimal false-negative and false-positive results) were determined. Peak systolic velocities cutoff points during expiration and inspiration were 280 and 272 cm/s, respectively, for the CA and 268 and 205 cm/s for the SMA. The end-diastolic velocity cutoff points during expiration and inspiration were 57 and 84 cm/s, respectively, for the CA and 101 and 52 cm/s for the SMA. Sensitivity for different duplex parameters in detecting mesenteric stenosis was 66% to 78% and specificity was 77% to 86%. Conclusions This study proposes new criteria related to respiration for duplex ultrasound imaging of the mesenteric arteries in patients with symptoms suggestive of CMS. It emphasizes the importance of taking into account the effect of respiration on duplex parameters. The lower sensitivity and specificity in our study compared with other studies puts into perspective the position of duplex imaging in the work-up of patients with suspected CMS. Duplex results should be used as a guide, with a low threshold giving a higher negative predictive value and, consequently, a lower positive predictive value.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.11.120

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Petersen, A. S., Meerwaldt, R., Kolkman, J. J., Huisman, A. B., van der Palen, J., van Bockel, J. H., Zeebregts, C. J., & Geelkerken, R. H.
Affiliations
  • Medisch Spectrum Twente (NL)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Geelkerken, Robert H.
Venue
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-06
Volume
57
Issue
6
Pages
1603-1611.e10
ISSN
0741-5214 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2152782745
Cited by
37
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 4
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Vascular Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Vascular anomalies and interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Renal and Vascular Pathologies
Keywords
mesenteric artery stenosis, mesenteric artery occlusion, respiration, peak systolic velocity, end-diastolic velocity, celiac artery, superior mesenteric artery, diagnostic criteria, sensitivity and specificity, angiography comparison, mesenteric blood flow
MeSH terms
Abdomen, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Ischemia, Male, Mesenteric Arteries, Mesentery, Middle Aged, Respiration, Splanchnic Circulation, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review