A systematic review of the clinical applications and complications of bone marrow aspirate concentrate in management of bone defects and nonunions
Abstract
Purpose Fracture healing encompasses a succession of dynamic multifactorial metabolic events, which ultimately re-establishes the integrity of the biomechanical properties of the bone. Up to 10% of the fractures occurring annually will need additional surgical procedures because of impaired healing. The aim of this article is to review the current literature regarding the use of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) and its effectiveness in the management of bone defects. Methods We have included all published clinical literature investigating the development, techniques and applications of BMAC. Language, design and risk of bias did not deter the initial inclusion of any study. Our search was exclusively limited to studies involving human subjects. A PRISMA compliant search was carried out as published in 2009. This included the online databases: PubMed, EMBASE, clinical trial.gov and the Cochrane library from 1960 to the end of May 2015. MeSH terms used included: "Bone" AND "Marrow" AND "Aspirate" AND "Concentrate" AND "Bone Defects" AND "NONUNION". Eligible studies were independently appraised by two authors using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program checklist. For the purpose of narrative review, relevant studies were included irrespective of methodology or level of evidence. Results Thirty-four of the 103 (48 PubMed and 55 EMBASE) results yielded by the preliminary search were included. Exclusions included three duplicate records, six letters, 17 non-orthopaedics related studies and four records irrelevant to our search topic. The CASP appraisal confirmed a satisfactory standard of 31 studies. They all had clearly defined objectives, were well designed and conducted appropriately to meet them. The published studies reported the use of BMAC in non-union and fracture healing (15 studies), bone defects (nine studies), spine fusion (two studies), distraction osteogensis (two studies) and complications related to the use of BMAC (seven studies). Conclusions Stem cells found in BMAC have the potential to self-renew, undertake clonal expansion and differentiate into different musculoskeletal tissues. The commercial processing of BMAC needs to be optimized in order to achieve a consistent end product, which will provide predicable and translatable results. The future potential of cell characterization in order to determine the optimum cell for repair/regeneration of bone also needs to be explored. Level of evidence Systematic Review of minimum level IV studies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), containing BM-MSCs, demonstrated efficacy in bone healing of non-unions, outperforming grafts, and minimizing complications in various studies.
“Bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), containing BM-MSCs, also demonstrated efficacy in bone healing of non-unions, outperforming grafts, and minimizing complications in various studies [39,94,95].”
From Mesenchymal Stem/Stromal Cells: Immunomodulatory and Bone Regeneration Potential after Tumor Excision in Osteosarcoma Patients (2023) · cites this paper as [95]
Cites
McCarrel, T., & Fortier, L. (2009) · Journal of Orthopaedic Research · doi:10.1002/jor.20853 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tissue Engineering and Cell-Based Therapies for Fractures and Bone Defects
Perez, J. R., Kouroupis, D., Li, D. J., Best, T. M., Kaplan, L., & Correa, D. (2018) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2018.00105 · Cited by 390 · see citing works
Baron, M., Drohat, P., Crawford, B., Hornicek, F. J., Best, T. M., & Kouroupis, D. (2023) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering10101187 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Imam, M. A., Holton, J., Ernstbrunner, L., Pepke, W., Grubhofer, F., Narvani, A., & Snow, M.
- Affiliations
- Suez Canal University (EG)
- Royal Orthopaedic Hospital (GB)
- University of Zurich (CH)
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- St Peter's Hospital (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Imam, Mohamed A.
- Venue
- International Orthopaedics
- Published
- 2017-08-13
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2213-2220
- ISSN
- 0341-2695 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-5195
- OpenAlex
- W2744343575
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10
- FWCI
- 1.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Orthopaedics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Bone fractures and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
- Keywords
- bone marrow aspirate concentrate, bone defects, nonunion, fracture healing, stem cells, bone regeneration, complications, spinal fusion, distraction osteogenesis, cell processing
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Bone and Bones, Bone Marrow, Fractures, Ununited, Humans, Bone Marrow Transplantation, Treatment Outcome, Fracture Healing, Osteogenesis, Distraction, Fractures, Bone, Mesenchymal Stem Cells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review