Cited by 16Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesNasal Surgery and Airway StudiesCongenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies

Minimally Invasive Otoplasty: Technical Details and Long-Term Results

de la Fuente, A., Sordo, G.·2012·Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

Abstract

Background Aesthetic correction of the ears requires thorough diagnosis and subsequent treatment of the affected areas. The authors' technique addresses every deformity that might need correction through separate incisions, minimal scars, and conservative dissection without the use of permanent sutures. Correction of the eventual discrepancy between cartilage height and the skin envelope is particularly observed and addressed by means of scaphal reduction. The technical details, long-term results, and complications are evaluated in this article. Methods A retrospective review of 100 otoplasties performed between 2005 and 2009 by a single surgeon was conducted. Charts were reviewed and data were collected on the type of deformity corrected, the complications, and the outcome. Results Minimally invasive otoplasty was performed for 100 patients, primarily women (n=71), with an average age of 23.2 years. In 96 cases, bilateral correction was performed using a combination of concho-mastoid sutures (81%), scapha reduction (76%), antihelical folding (70%), conchal reduction (53%), or earlobe correction (19%). Three patients experienced partial recurrence and needed further correction. Partial upper pole necrosis developed in one patient after undue tension was applied to his dressing, and further correction was needed. Three patients experienced mild partial skin discoloration and epidermolysis that lasted no more than 10 days. Most of the patients were very satisfied (84%) or satisfied (15%) with the procedure after an average follow-up period of 12.4 months. Conclusions Restoration of facial harmony through aesthetic correction of the ears is a highly satisfying procedure for both patients and surgeons. Since 1988, the author's unit has pursued and improved a technique that could provide shorter recovery times, minimal morbidity, and predictable results for a population consisting primarily of adults. This minimally invasive technique can achieve these goals with excellent long-term aesthetic outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00266-011-9754-4

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Minimally invasive otoplasty outcomes demonstrate high satisfaction, minimal morbidity, and optimal results in patients with well-defined antihelix and limited conchal hypertrophy.

    “Outcomes demonstrate high satisfaction, minimal morbidity, and optimal results in patients with well-defined antihelix and limited conchal hypertrophy.50–52”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de la Fuente, A., & Sordo, G.
Venue
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
Published
2011-06-03
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
77-82
ISSN
  • 0364-216X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-5241
OpenAlex
W2147913835
Cited by
16
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
Keywords
prominent ears, recurrence, postoperative complications, long-term outcomes, patient satisfaction
MeSH terms
Ear Diseases, Ear, External, Female, Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures, Plastic Surgery Procedures, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review