Cited by 330Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesCongenital Ear and Nasal AnomaliesNasal Surgery and Airway Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A “NATURAL” TECHNIQUE FOR CORRECTION OF CONGENITALLY PROMINENT EARS

STENSTRÖM, STEN J.·1963·Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00006534-196311000-00003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cartilage-breaking methods such as Stenström and Chongchet anterior scoring reduce recurrence but risk overcorrection.

    “Cartilage-breaking methods, such as Stenström21 and Chongchet22 anterior scoring, reduce recurrence but risk overcorrection.23,24”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
STENSTRÖM, S. J.
Corresponding author
STENSTRÖM, STEN J.
Venue
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Published
1963-11
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
509-518
ISSN
0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011954215
Cited by
328
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 10
FWCI
2.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics (clinical) › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
Keywords
prominent ears, congenital ear deformity, otoplasty
MeSH terms
Child, Ear Deformities, Acquired, Ear Diseases, Ear, External, Humans, Plastics, Surgery, Plastic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review