Cited by 122Wildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesRangeland and Wildlife Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Managing a Subsidized Predator Population: Reducing Common Raven Predation on Desert Tortoises

Boarman, William I.·2003·Environmental Management

Abstract

Human communities often are an inadvertent source of food, water, and other resources to native species of wildlife. Because these resources are more stable and predictable than those in a natural environment, animals that subsist on them are able to increase in numbers and expand their range, much to the detriment of their competitors and species they prey upon. In the Mojave Desert, common ravens (Corvus corax) have benefited from human-provided resources to increase in population size precipitously in recent years. This trend has caused concern because ravens prey on juvenile desert tortoises (Gopherus agassizi), a federally threatened species. In this paper, I discuss management strategies to reduce raven predation on desert tortoises. The recommendations fall into three categories: (1) managing raven populations by reducing access to anthropogenic resources; (2) removing offending ravens or other birds in specially targeted tortoise management zones; and (3) continuing research on raven ecology, raven behavior, and methods of reducing raven predation on tortoises. I also recommend approaching the problem within an adaptive management framework: management efforts should first be employed as scientific experiments--with replicates and controls--to yield an unbiased assessment of their effectiveness. Furthermore, these strategies should be implemented in concert with actions that reduce other causes of desert tortoise mortality to aid the long-term recovery of their popula…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00267-003-2982-x

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–122 of 122

Metadata

Authors
Boarman, W. I.
Affiliations
United States Geological Survey (US)
Corresponding author
Boarman, William I.
Venue
Environmental Management
Published
2003-09-01
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
205-217
ISSN
  • 0364-152X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1009
OpenAlex
W2089784785
Cited by
122
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Geological Survey
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Keywords
Corvus corax, desert tortoise, Gopherus agassizii, predator-prey interactions, adaptive management, Mojave Desert, endangered species conservation
MeSH terms
Animals, Birds, Conservation of Natural Resources, Desert Climate, Ecology, Environment, Population Dynamics, Predatory Behavior, Turtles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review