Cited by 196Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesBiological Control of Invasive SpeciesBotany and Plant Ecology Studies

Ornamental Plants as Invasive Aliens: Problems and Solutions in Kruger National Park, South Africa

Open access

Abstract

The most widespread invasive alien plant species in South Africa's Kruger National Park (KNP) were either introduced unintentionally along rivers and roads, or intentionally for use as ornamentals. We examine the spatial distribution of ornamental alien plants in KNP, look at the link between human population size, history, and species richness, and show how the distribution of particular species reflects the likely history of ornamental plantings. Results are used to assess whether past management actions have been appropriately directed. Two hundred and fifty-eight alien species have been recorded in the 36 tourist camps and staff villages. The number of staff housed in villages explains much of the diversity of cultivated alien plant species. Older camps also tend to have more ornamental alien plant species. However, the lack of a strong link between camp age and number of cultivated species suggests that ornamental plants have been widely spread around the KNP by humans. We also show that increased camp activity (either size or age) has led to more ornamental species, while, with the notable exception of Skukuza, camp activity has had a much smaller effect on the number of noncultivated species. Noncultivated species tend to be naturally dispersed, as opposed to directly spread by humans between camps. Past management prioritized certain species on the basis of their potential to invade KNP and on the prevailing national legislation. These species were removed manually and follow-up control was carried out. Once the priority species were deemed to be under control, less invasive species were targeted. All alien species were removed from vacated houses, regardless of the potential invasiveness of the species.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00267-007-9027-9

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ornamental horticulture continues to be a major driver of alien plant invasions, even in protected areas.

    “Ornamental plants have escaped from gardens for centuries (Hanspach et al., 2008), and ornamental horticulture continues to be a major driver of alien plant invasions (van Kleunen et al., 2018), even in protected areas (Foxcroft, Richardson, & Wilson, 2008).”

    From Scientists' warning on invasive alien species (2020) · cites this paper as Foxcroft, Richardson, & Wilson, 2008

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. du Toit JT., Rogers KH, Biggs HC (eds) (2003) The Kruger experience: ecology and management of savanna heterogeneity. Island Press, Washington, D.C Ewel JJ, O'Dowd DJ, Bergelson J, Daehler CC, D'Antonio CM, Go ´mez LD, Gordon DR, Hobbs RJ, Holt A, Hopper KR, Hughes CE, LaHart M, Leakey RRB, Lee WG, Loope LL, Lorence DH, Louda SM, Lugo AE, McEvoy PB, Richardson DM, Vitousek PM (1999) Deliberate introductions of species: Research needs. BioScience 49:619-630
  2. Freitag-Ronaldson S, Foxcroft LC (2003) Anthropogenic influences at the ecosystem level. In: du Toit JT, Rogers KH, Biggs HC (eds) The Kruger experience: ecology and management of savanna heterogeneity. Island Press, Washington, D.C. pp 391-421
  3. Milton SJ, Wilson JRU, Richardson DM, Seymour C, Dean WRJ, Iponga DM, Proches ¸S ¸(2007) Non-native plant species ''infil- trate'' bird-generated shrub nucleation processes in arid savanna. Journal of Ecology 95:648-661
  4. Rejma ´nek M, Richardson DM, Higgins SI, Pitcairn MJ, Grotkopp E (2005a) Ecology of invasive plants: State of the art. In: Mooney HA, Mack RM, McNeely JA, Neville L, Schei P, Waage J (eds) Invasive alien species: a new synthesis. Island Press, Washington D.C. pp 104-161
  5. Rejma ´nek M, Richardson DM, Pys ˇek P (2005b) Plant invasions and invasibility of plant communities. In: van der Maarel E (ed) Vegetation Ecology. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford pp 332-355
  6. Richardson DM, Cambray JA, Chapman RA, Dean WRJ, Griffiths CL, Le Maitre DC, Newton DJ, Winstanley TJ (2003) Vectors and pathways of biological invasions in South Africa -Past, future and present. In: Ruiz G, Carlton J (eds) Invasive Species: Vectors and Management Strategies. Island Press, Washington, D.C. pp 292-349
  7. Sullivan JJ, Timmins SM, Williams PA (2005) Movement of exotic plants into coastal native forests from gardens in northern New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 29:1-10
  8. Williams PA, Cameron EK (2006) Creating gardens: The diversity and Progression of European plants introductions. In: Allen RB, Lee WG (eds) Biological Invasions in New Zealand. Ecological Studies, Vol. 186, Springer-Verlag, Berlin pp 33-47
  9. Wittenberg R, Cock MJW (2005) Best practices for the prevention and management of invasive alien species. In: Mooney HA, Mack RN, McNeely JA, Neville LE, Schei PJ, Waage JK (eds) Invasive alien species: a new synthesis. Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment (SCOPE): 63. Island Press, Washington, D.C. pp 209-232 date 1902 1934 1902 1908 1983 1919 1960 1924 1927 1920 1928 1970 1991 1982 1954 1978 1938 1982 1991 1959 1932 1930 1976 1973 1988 1958 1924 1995 1990 1990 1983 1973 1990 1985 1990 1930

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Foxcroft, L. C., Richardson, D. M., & Wilson, J. R. U.
Affiliations
  • South African National Parks (ZA)
  • Stellenbosch University (ZA)
Corresponding author
Foxcroft, Llewellyn C.
Venue
Environmental Management
Published
2007-10-18
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
32-51
ISSN
  • 0364-152X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1009
OpenAlex
W2127559264
Cited by
196
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Hans-Sigrist-Stiftung
  • Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
  • DST-NRF Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology
  • South African National Parks
  • Division of Materials Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Biological Control of Invasive Species
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Botany and Plant Ecology Studies
Keywords
invasive alien plants, ornamental plants, Kruger National Park, tourist camps, human-mediated dispersal, species richness, manual removal, management prioritization, human population size
MeSH terms
Conservation of Natural Resources, Environmental Monitoring, Population Dynamics, South Africa, Ecosystem, Plant Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review