Cited by 57Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementWildlife Ecology and ConservationRangeland and Wildlife Management

Ten lessons for the conservation of African savannah ecosystems

Beale, Colin M., Rensberg, Sue van, Bond, William J., Coughenour, Mike, Fynn, Richard, Gaylard, Angela, Grant, Rina, Harris, Brian +4 more·2013·Biological Conservation

Abstract

Knowledge of the success or otherwise of conservation interventions is often locked within localised networks, resulting in mistakes being replicated unnecessarily. The savannahs of eastern and southern Africa are home to spectacular ecosystems with similar ecology yet markedly different conservation practices between the two regions. Pressures on east African ecosystems are rising in ways similar to those of southern Africa several decades ago. Conservation practitioners and researchers from southern and eastern Africa came together for a 5-day workshop to identify by consensus a short list of 10 most important lessons for management of savannah habitats learnt from the southern experience. The lessons identified concerned (1) protected area design, (2) community relationships, (3) buffer zones, (4) the importance of migrations and corridors, (5) river catchment management, (6) law enforcement, (7) invasive plants, (8) road planning, (9) loss of heterogeneity, and (10) communication between researchers and practitioners. The lessons learnt from southern Africa can prevent many mistakes being made in east African protected area management, providing they are implemented on the ground.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.08.025

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Maintaining or restoring self-sustaining predator-prey relationships is challenging, especially within protected areas.

    “Yet, maintaining or restoring predator-prey relationships that are self-sustaining is challenging [6,7], especially within protected areas, which rarely encompass entire, self-sustaining ecosystems [8,9].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 103 · Cited by 57

Authors
Beale, C. M., Rensberg, S. V., Bond, W. J., Coughenour, M., Fynn, R., Gaylard, A., Grant, R., Harris, B., Jones, T., Mduma, S., Owen-Smith, N., & Sinclair, A. R. E.
Affiliations
  • University of York (GB)
  • South African Environmental Observation Network (ZA)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • Colorado State University (US)
  • University of Botswana (BW)
  • Scientific Services (ZA)
  • Tanzania National Parks (TZ)
  • Anglia Ruskin University (GB)
  • Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute (TZ)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Beale, Colin M.
Venue
Biological Conservation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-11
Volume
167
Pages
224-232
ISSN
0006-3207 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2105092098
Cited by
57
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
4.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Conservation (publishedVersion)
  • Nelson Mandela University Research Repository (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
Keywords
savanna ecosystems, protected area design, community-based conservation, buffer zones, river catchment management, law enforcement, invasive plants, road planning, habitat heterogeneity, East Africa, Southern Africa, transboundary conservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review