Ten lessons for the conservation of African savannah ecosystems
Abstract
Knowledge of the success or otherwise of conservation interventions is often locked within localised networks, resulting in mistakes being replicated unnecessarily. The savannahs of eastern and southern Africa are home to spectacular ecosystems with similar ecology yet markedly different conservation practices between the two regions. Pressures on east African ecosystems are rising in ways similar to those of southern Africa several decades ago. Conservation practitioners and researchers from southern and eastern Africa came together for a 5-day workshop to identify by consensus a short list of 10 most important lessons for management of savannah habitats learnt from the southern experience. The lessons identified concerned (1) protected area design, (2) community relationships, (3) buffer zones, (4) the importance of migrations and corridors, (5) river catchment management, (6) law enforcement, (7) invasive plants, (8) road planning, (9) loss of heterogeneity, and (10) communication between researchers and practitioners. The lessons learnt from southern Africa can prevent many mistakes being made in east African protected area management, providing they are implemented on the ground.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Maintaining or restoring self-sustaining predator-prey relationships is challenging, especially within protected areas.
“Yet, maintaining or restoring predator-prey relationships that are self-sustaining is challenging [6,7], especially within protected areas, which rarely encompass entire, self-sustaining ecosystems [8,9].”
From Effects of Vegetation Structure on the Location of Lion Kill Sites in African Thicket (2016) · cites this paper as [9]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 103 · Cited by 57
- Authors
- Beale, C. M., Rensberg, S. V., Bond, W. J., Coughenour, M., Fynn, R., Gaylard, A., Grant, R., Harris, B., Jones, T., Mduma, S., Owen-Smith, N., & Sinclair, A. R. E.
- Affiliations
- University of York (GB)
- South African Environmental Observation Network (ZA)
- University of Cape Town (ZA)
- Colorado State University (US)
- University of Botswana (BW)
- Scientific Services (ZA)
- Tanzania National Parks (TZ)
- Anglia Ruskin University (GB)
- Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute (TZ)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Beale, Colin M.
- Venue
- Biological Conservation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-11
- Volume
- 167
- Pages
- 224-232
- ISSN
- 0006-3207 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2105092098
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 103
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 4.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Conservation (publishedVersion)
- Nelson Mandela University Research Repository (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Keywords
- savanna ecosystems, protected area design, community-based conservation, buffer zones, river catchment management, law enforcement, invasive plants, road planning, habitat heterogeneity, East Africa, Southern Africa, transboundary conservation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review