The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Environmental Stewardship: A Conceptual Review and Analytical Framework
Open accessAbstract
There has been increasing attention to and investment in local environmental stewardship in conservation and environmental management policies and programs globally. Yet environmental stewardship has not received adequate conceptual attention. Establishing a clear definition and comprehensive analytical framework could strengthen our ability to understand the factors that lead to the success or failure of environmental stewardship in different contexts and how to most effectively support and enable local efforts. Here we propose such a definition and framework. First, we define local environmental stewardship as the actions taken by individuals, groups or networks of actors, with various motivations and levels of capacity, to protect, care for or responsibly use the environment in pursuit of environmental and/or social outcomes in diverse social-ecological contexts. Next, drawing from a review of the environmental stewardship, management and governance literatures, we unpack the elements of this definition to develop an analytical framework that can facilitate research on local environmental stewardship. Finally, we discuss potential interventions and leverage points for promoting or supporting local stewardship and future applications of the framework to guide descriptive, evaluative, prescriptive or systematic analysis of environmental stewardship. Further application of this framework in diverse environmental and social contexts is recommended to refine the elements and develop insights that will guide and improve the outcomes of environmental stewardship initiatives and investments. Ultimately, our aim is to raise the profile of environmental stewardship as a valuable and holistic concept for guiding productive and sustained relationships with the environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 54,599
Maslow, A. H. (1943) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0054346 · Cited by 21,563 · cited 1×
“…actions can also be intrinsically motivated by the desire for autonomy, relatedness, and competence—which correspond with the three universal psychological needs of self-determination theory (Ryan and Deci 2000b; Cetas and Yasué 2017)—and the higher order need for self-actualization (Maslow 1943).”
BackgroundIntrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020 · Cited by 18,666
A safe operating space for humanity
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/461472a · Cited by 13,333
A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems
Ostrom, E. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1172133 · Cited by 8,656
Value orientations, gender and environmental concern
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916593255002 · Cited by 2,162 · cited 1×
“In general, a complex combination of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations work in concert to promote stewardship actions (Stern et al. 1993; Tabernero and Hernández 2011; Asah et al. 2014; Krasny et al. 2014).”
BackgroundEcosystem stewardship: sustainability strategies for a rapidly changing planet
Chapin, F. S., Carpenter, S. R., Kofinas, G. P., Folke, C., Abel, N., Clark, W. C., Olsson, P., Smith, D. M. S., Walker, B., Young, O. R., et al. (2010) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.10.008 · Cited by 971
Domesticated nature: Shaping landscapes and ecosystems for human welfare
Kareiva, P., Watts, S., McDonald, R., & Boucher, T. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1140170 · Cited by 945
Nyborg, K., Anderies, J. M., Dannenberg, A., Lindahl, T., Schill, C., Schlüter, M., Adger, W. N., Arrow, K. J., Barrett, S., Carpenter, S., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf8317 · Cited by 775
Governance principles for natural resource management
Lockwood, M., Davidson, J., Curtis, A., Stratford, E., & Griffith, R. (2010) · Society & Natural Resources · doi:10.1080/08941920802178214 · Cited by 630
Cited by
Impact of CSR disclosure on profitability and firm performance of Malaysian halal food companies
Ahmad, Z., Hidthiir, M. H. B., & Rahman, M. M. (2024) · Discover Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s43621-024-00189-3 · Cited by 37
User circularity practices: Adopting a user stewardship perspective for a circular economy
Conduit, J., Karpen, I. O., & Willmott, T. (2023) · AMS Review · doi:10.1007/s13162-023-00262-6 · Cited by 20
Ecologically embedded design in manufacturing: legitimation within circular economy
Trollman, H., Colwill, J., & Brejnholt, A. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12104261 · Cited by 17
Watkins & Goodwin Sacrifices 2019 Pre-Print
Watkins, H. M. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/gbwsq
Metadata
- Authors
- Bennett, N. J., Whitty, T. S., Finkbeiner, E., Pittman, J., Bassett, H., Gelcich, S., & Allison, E. H.
- Venue
- Environmental Management
- Published
- 2018-01-31
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 597-614
- ISSN
- 0364-152X (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1009
- OpenAlex
- W2787384236
- Cited by
- 596
- References
- 14
- FWCI
- 72.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Environmental Stewardship: A Conceptual Review and Analytical Framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00267-017-0993-2
- The paper
- Bennett, N. J., Whitty, T. S., Finkbeiner, E., Pittman, J., Bassett, H., Gelcich, S., & Allison, E. H. (2018). Environmental Stewardship: A Conceptual Review and Analytical Framework. Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0993-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.