Cited by 410Public Policy and Administration ResearchCoastal and Marine ManagementConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management

Institutional Analysis and Ecosystem-Based Management: The Institutional Analysis and Development Framework

Imperial, Mark T.·1999·Environmental Management

Abstract

/ Scholars, government practitioners, and environmentalists are increasingly supportive of collaborative, ecosystem-based approaches to natural resource management. However, few researchers have focused their attention on examining the important administrative and institutional challenges surrounding ecosystem-based management. This paper describes how the institutional analysis and development (IAD) framework can be used to better understand the institutional arrangements used to implement ecosystem-based management programs. Some of the observations emanating from previous research on institutional design and performance are also discussed. The paper's central argument is that if this new resource management paradigm is to take hold and flourish, researchers and practitioners must pay closer attention to the questions surrounding institutional design and performance. This should help improve our understanding of the relationship between science and human values in decision making. It should also help researchers avoid making faulty policy recommendations and improve the implementation of ecosystem-based management programs.KEY WORDS: Ecosystem management; Watershed management; Common pool resources; Implementation; Institutional analysis; Evaluation; Policy analysishttp://link.springer-ny.com/link/service/journals/00267/bibs/24n4p449.html</HEA

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s002679900246

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Polycentric governance systems facilitate parallel efforts to experiment with different ideas and rule combinations which, when combined with information transmission and learning, can lead to institutional innovation to cope with change.

    “their capacity for adaption has been linked to the notion that they facilitate parallel efforts to experiment with different ideas and rule combinations which, when combined with information transmission and learning, can lead to institutional innovation to cope with change (Imperial, 1999; E. Ostrom, 1999).”

    From Polycentric Systems of Governance: A Theoretical Model for the Commons (2019) · cites this paper as Imperial, 1999

  • Participation in cross-scale linkages or other mechanisms for deliberation and learning may be necessary for this purpose.

    “As governance actors may be widely dispersed in a polycentric governance system, participation in cross-scale linkages or other mechanisms for deliberation and learning (enabling condition 4.1.3) may be necessary for this purpose (Galaz et al., 2008; Imperial, 1999).”

    From Polycentric Systems of Governance: A Theoretical Model for the Commons (2019) · cites this paper as Imperial, 1999

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Imperial, M. T.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Imperial, Mark T.
Venue
Environmental Management
Published
1999-11-01
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
449-465
ISSN
  • 0364-152X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1009
OpenAlex
W2073652155
Cited by
410
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 18
FWCI
23.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Coastal and Marine Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Keywords
ecosystem-based management, institutional analysis and development, institutional design, institutional performance, natural resource management, watershed management, common-pool resources, policy implementation, policy evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review