Institutional Analysis and Ecosystem-Based Management: The Institutional Analysis and Development Framework
Abstract
/ Scholars, government practitioners, and environmentalists are increasingly supportive of collaborative, ecosystem-based approaches to natural resource management. However, few researchers have focused their attention on examining the important administrative and institutional challenges surrounding ecosystem-based management. This paper describes how the institutional analysis and development (IAD) framework can be used to better understand the institutional arrangements used to implement ecosystem-based management programs. Some of the observations emanating from previous research on institutional design and performance are also discussed. The paper's central argument is that if this new resource management paradigm is to take hold and flourish, researchers and practitioners must pay closer attention to the questions surrounding institutional design and performance. This should help improve our understanding of the relationship between science and human values in decision making. It should also help researchers avoid making faulty policy recommendations and improve the implementation of ecosystem-based management programs.KEY WORDS: Ecosystem management; Watershed management; Common pool resources; Implementation; Institutional analysis; Evaluation; Policy analysishttp://link.springer-ny.com/link/service/journals/00267/bibs/24n4p449.html</HEA
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Polycentric governance systems facilitate parallel efforts to experiment with different ideas and rule combinations which, when combined with information transmission and learning, can lead to institutional innovation to cope with change.
“their capacity for adaption has been linked to the notion that they facilitate parallel efforts to experiment with different ideas and rule combinations which, when combined with information transmission and learning, can lead to institutional innovation to cope with change (Imperial, 1999; E. Ostrom, 1999).”
From Polycentric Systems of Governance: A Theoretical Model for the Commons (2019) · cites this paper as Imperial, 1999
Participation in cross-scale linkages or other mechanisms for deliberation and learning may be necessary for this purpose.
“As governance actors may be widely dispersed in a polycentric governance system, participation in cross-scale linkages or other mechanisms for deliberation and learning (enabling condition 4.1.3) may be necessary for this purpose (Galaz et al., 2008; Imperial, 1999).”
From Polycentric Systems of Governance: A Theoretical Model for the Commons (2019) · cites this paper as Imperial, 1999
Cites
Crawford, S. E. S., & Ostrom, E. (1995) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2082975 · Cited by 1,362 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Resilience and Sustainable Development: Building Adaptive Capacity in a World of Transformations
Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Elmqvist, T., Gunderson, L., Holling, C. S., & Walker, B. (2002) · AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment · doi:10.1579/0044-7447-31.5.437 · Cited by 3,136 · see citing works
Polycentric Systems of Governance: A Theoretical Model for the Commons
Carlisle, K., & Gruby, R. L. (2019) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/psj.12212 · Cited by 745 · see citing works
“A competition of ideas and methods employed by decision-making centers may also drive the self-organizing tendencies of polycentric governance systems, enabling them to better address emerging challenges and goals without central direction (see Olsson et al., 2007; Imperial, 1999).”
BackgroundInfluentialHuntjens, P., Lebel, L., Pahl-Wostl, C., Camkin, J., Schulze, R., & Kranz, N. (2012) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.09.015 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Primmer, E., & Furman, E. (2012) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.008 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Freshwater for resilience: a shift in thinking
Folke, C. (2003) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2003.1385 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
- Authors
- Imperial, M. T.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Imperial, Mark T.
- ORCID
- Imperial, Mark T.
- Venue
- Environmental Management
- Published
- 1999-11-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 449-465
- ISSN
- 0364-152X (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1009
- OpenAlex
- W2073652155
- Cited by
- 410
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 23.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Environmental Management (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Coastal and Marine Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Keywords
- ecosystem-based management, institutional analysis and development, institutional design, institutional performance, natural resource management, watershed management, common-pool resources, policy implementation, policy evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review