The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Incidence and Factors Associated with Recurrence Patterns after Intended Curative Surgery for Gastric Cancer
Abstract
Abstract Recurrence after curative resection for gastric cancer remains high. We examined its incidence and factors related to recurrence pattern, while trying to avoid the interaction of various factors. A total of 611 gastric cancer patients after resection for curative intent (1988–1995) were analyzed. The result showed that 245 patients had recurrence (40.1%). Cumulative recurrence rates were 53.5%, 80%, 89.0%, 94.7%, 96.3%, 98%, and 99.5% at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 years, respectively. Over half of patients with recurrence (123; 50.2%) had an initial single recurrence. Taking single and multiple recurrence together, most recurrences (213; 86.9%) were distant metastases, 110 recurrences (44.9%) were local relapses, and 78 recurrences (49.8%) were both local and distant. Among the distant metastases, 131 patients (53.5%) had peritoneal dissemination, 106 patients (43.3%) had hematogenous metastases, and 70 patients (28.6%) had distant lymphatic spread. Scirrhous‐type stromal reaction, serosa invasion, and female gender were factors negatively related to peritoneal recurrence. Medullary‐type stromal reaction and male gender showed a preference for locoregional recurrence, and expanding growth tumor commonly led to hematogenous metastasis. Patients who had paraaortic lymph node metastasis were at high risk of developing distant lymphatic recurrence. It is conceivable that the patterns of recurrence and the times to recurrence provide a biological basis for clinical monitoring of patients with the aim of modifying therapeutic modalities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Noh, S. H., Park, S. R., Yang, H.-K., Chung, H. C., Chung, I.-J., Kim, S.-W., Kim, H.-H., Choi, J.-H., Kim, H.-K., Yu, W., et al. (2014) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(14)70473-5 · Cited by 1,049
Self-citationNodal dissection for patients with gastric cancer: a randomised controlled trial
Wu, C.-W., Hsiung, C. A., Lo, S.-S., Hsieh, M.-C., Chen, J.-H., Li, A. F.-Y., Lui, W.-Y., & Whang-Peng, J. (2006) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(06)70623-4 · Cited by 620
Self-citationCatalano, V., Labianca, R., Beretta, G. D., Gatta, G., de Braud, F., & Van Cutsem, E. (2009) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2009.01.004 · Cited by 365
MicroRNA‑23a/27a/24‑2 cluster promotes gastric cancer cell proliferation synergistically
Hua, K., Chen, Y., Chen, C., Tang, Y., Huang, T., Lin, Y., Yeh, T., Huang, K., Lee, H., Hsu, M., et al. (2018) · Oncology Letters · doi:10.3892/ol.2018.8924 · Cited by 27
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, C., Lo, S., Shen, K., Hsieh, M., Chen, J., Chiang, J., Lin, H., Li, A. F. ‐., & Lui, W.
- Venue
- World Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 153-158
- ISSN
- 0364-2313 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2323
- OpenAlex
- W57848150
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence and Factors Associated with Recurrence Patterns after Intended Curative Surgery for Gastric Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00268-002-6279-7
- The paper
- Wu, C., Lo, S., Shen, K., Hsieh, M., Chen, J., Chiang, J., Lin, H., Li, A. F. ‐., & Lui, W. (2003). Incidence and Factors Associated with Recurrence Patterns after Intended Curative Surgery for Gastric Cancer. World Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-002-6279-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.