Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 401

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Long‐term Results of Partial Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreatic Head: 25‐Year Experience

Richter, Axel, Niedergethmann, Marco, Sturm, Jörg W., Lorenz, Dietmar, Post, Stefan, Trede, Michael·2003·World Journal of Surgery

Abstract

Abstract The prognosis of patients who undergo resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with curative intention is generally poor unless they have early‐stage disease. Based on our 25‐year experience, the results of 194 patients after a standardized Kausch‐Whipple resection for adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head were analyzed and the prognostic factors were evaluated. Between 1972 and 1998 a total of 221 patients were diagnosed for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head, and 194 of them subsequently underwent a standardized Kausch‐Whipple resection. Long‐term results and prognostic factors were examined by multivariate and univariate analyses. The overall postoperative mortality was 3.09%, and the morbidity was 29.9%. By multivariate analysis only curative resection (R0) was significantly related to a favorable prognosis (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, in case of a curative resection, the presence of lymph node metastases showed prognostic significance in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.005). Cumulative survival analysis revealed a 5‐year survival rate of 25.4%, a 7‐year survival rate of 12.3%, and a 10‐year survival rate of 8.2% for patients who underwent curative resection (R0) for adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. We demonstrated that the R0 status is the only independent prognostic factor after surgery for adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. In the case of a curative resection, the presence of lymph node metastases is of prognostic relevance. In view of considerable surgical morbidity and mortality, resection for cancer of the pancreatic head is the only option if the lesion is resectable. We concluded that surgical treatment is “as good as it gets,” as extended techniques have not proved to produce better results.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00268-002-6659-z

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 401

Metadata

Authors
Richter, A., Niedergethmann, M., Sturm, J. W., Lorenz, D., Post, S., & Trede, M.
Venue
World Journal of Surgery
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-03
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
324-329
ISSN
  • 0364-2313 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2323
OpenAlex
W1976414440
Cited by
401
References
0
FWCI
6.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long‐term Results of Partial Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreatic Head: 25‐Year Experience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00268-002-6659-z
The paper
Richter, A., Niedergethmann, M., Sturm, J. W., Lorenz, D., Post, S., & Trede, M. (2003). Long‐term Results of Partial Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreatic Head: 25‐Year Experience. World Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-002-6659-z

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.