Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 221

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluation of 18F‐2‐deoxy‐2‐fluoro‐d‐glucose Positron Emission Tomography for Gastric Cancer

Mochiki, Erito, Kuwano, Hiroyuki, Katoh, Hiroyuki, Asao, Takayuki, Oriuchi, Noboru, Endo, Keigo·2004·World Journal of Surgery

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) with 18 F‐2‐deoxy‐2‐fluoro‐d‐glucose (FDG) has been investigated as a means of detecting certain primary tumors and their metastatic disease in recent years. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of FDG‐PET and operative assessment with formal pathologic staging. Altogether, 85 patients had undergone surgical treatment for gastric cancer with curative intent, with FDG‐PET preoperatively. The results using FDG‐PET were compared with those using computed tomography (CT); they were also correlated with the pathologic findings. For quantitative analysis, the regional tumor uptake was measured by the standard uptake value (SUV) using a region of interest technique. Using FDG‐PET, the primary tumor was visualized in 75.2% of patients. A comparison of the FDG uptake and the clinicopathologic findings showed that there was a significant association between FDG uptake and the depth of invasion, the size of the tumor, and lymph node metastasis. FDG‐PET scans had less accuracy for diagnosing locoregional lymph nodes than CT because of a significant lack of sensitivity (23.3% vs. 65.0%). The survival rate for patients with high FDG uptake (SUV > 4) was significantly lower than that for those with low FDG uptake (SUV < 4) (p < 0.05). FDG‐PET was successful in detecting the primary gastric cancer lesion but not for finding early‐stage gastric cancers. Detection of nodal metastasis also was not possible by FDG‐PET. However, FDG‐PET appears to provide important additional information concerning the aggressiveness of the tumor and the prognosis in patients with gastric cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00268-003-7191-5

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 221

Metadata

Authors
Mochiki, E., Kuwano, H., Katoh, H., Asao, T., Oriuchi, N., & Endo, K.
Venue
World Journal of Surgery
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-02-17
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
247-253
ISSN
  • 0364-2313 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2323
OpenAlex
W1990384442
Cited by
221
References
1
FWCI
9.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of 18F‐2‐deoxy‐2‐fluoro‐d‐glucose Positron Emission Tomography for Gastric Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00268-003-7191-5
The paper
Mochiki, E., Kuwano, H., Katoh, H., Asao, T., Oriuchi, N., & Endo, K. (2004). Evaluation of 18F‐2‐deoxy‐2‐fluoro‐d‐glucose Positron Emission Tomography for Gastric Cancer. World Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-003-7191-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.