Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 504

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intraoperative Monitoring of the Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve in Thyroid Surgery

Dralle, H., Sekulla, C., Lorenz, K., Brauckhoff, M., Machens, A., the German IONM Study Group·2008·World Journal of Surgery

Abstract

Background: Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy ranks among the leading reasons for medicolegal litigation of surgeons because of its attendant reduction in quality of life. As a risk minimization tool, intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) has been introduced to verify RLN function integrity intraoperatively. Nevertheless, a systematic evidence‐based assessment of this novel health technology has not been performed. Methods: The present study was based on a systematic appraisal of the literature using evidence‐based criteria. Results: Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy rates (RLNPR) varied widely after thyroid surgery, ranging from 0%–7.1% for transient RLN palsy to 0%–11% for permanent RLN palsy. These rates did not differ much from those reported for visual nerve identification without the use of IONM. Six studies with more than 100 nerves at risk (NAR) each evaluated RLNPR by contrasting IONM with visual nerve identification only. Recuurent laryngeal nerve palsy rates tended to be lower with IONM than without it, but this difference was not statistically significant. Six additional studies compared IONM findings with their corresponding postoperative laryngoscopic results. Those studies revealed high negative predictive values (NPV; 92%–100%), but relatively low and variable positive predictive values (PPV; 10%–90%) for IONM, limiting its utility for intraoperative RLN management. Conclusions: Apart from navigating the surgeon through challenging anatomies, IONM may lend itself as a routine adjunct to the gold standard of visual nerve identification. To further reduce the number of false negative IONM signals, the causes underlying its relatively low PPV require additional clarification.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00268-008-9483-2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 504

Metadata

Authors
Dralle, H., Sekulla, C., Lorenz, K., Brauckhoff, M., Machens, A., & the German IONM Study Group
Venue
World Journal of Surgery
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-02-28
Volume
32
Issue
7
Pages
1358-1366
ISSN
  • 0364-2313 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2323
OpenAlex
W1978635493
Cited by
504
References
1
FWCI
28.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intraoperative Monitoring of the Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve in Thyroid Surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00268-008-9483-2
The paper
Dralle, H., Sekulla, C., Lorenz, K., Brauckhoff, M., Machens, A., & the German IONM Study Group. (2008). Intraoperative Monitoring of the Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve in Thyroid Surgery. World Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-008-9483-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.