Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,047

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Electrophysiologic recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring during thyroid and parathyroid surgery: International standards guideline statement

Open access
Randolph, Gregory W., Dralle, Henning, with the International Intraoperative Monitoring Study Group, Abdullah, Hisham, Barczynski, Marcin, Bellantone, Rocco, Brauckhoff, Michael, Carnaille, Bruno, Cherenko, Sergii, Chiang, Fen‐Yu, Dionigi, Gianlorenzo, Finck, Camille, Hartl, Dana, Kamani, Dipti, Lorenz, Kerstin, Miccolli, Paolo, Mihai, Radu, Miyauchi, Akira, Orloff, Lisa, Perrier, Nancy, Poveda, Manuel Duran, Romanchishen, Anatoly, Serpell, Jonathan, Sitges‐Serra, Antonio, Sloan, Tod, Van Slycke, Sam, Snyder, Samuel, Takami, Hiroshi, Volpi, Erivelto, Woodson, Gayle·2011·The Laryngoscope

Abstract

Intraoperative neural monitoring (IONM) during thyroid and parathyroid surgery has gained widespread acceptance as an adjunct to the gold standard of visual nerve identification. Despite the increasing use of IONM, review of the literature and clinical experience confirms there is little uniformity in application of and results from nerve monitoring across different centers. We provide a review of the literature and cumulative experience of the multidisciplinary International Neural Monitoring Study Group with IONM spanning nearly 15 years. The study group focused its initial work on formulation of standards in IONM as it relates to important areas: 1) standards of equipment setup/endotracheal tube placement and 2) standards of loss of signal evaluation/intraoperative problem‐solving algorithm. The use of standardized methods and reporting will provide greater uniformity in application of IONM. In addition, this report clarifies the limitations of IONM and helps identify areas where additional research is necessary. This guideline is, at its forefront, quality driven; it is intended to improve the quality of neural monitoring, to translate the best available evidence into clinical practice to promote best practices. We hope this work will minimize inappropriate variations in monitoring rather than to dictate practice options. Laryngoscope, 121:S1–S16, 2011

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/lary.21119

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 1,047

Metadata

Authors
Randolph, G. W., Dralle, H., with the International Intraoperative Monitoring Study Group, Abdullah, H., Barczynski, M., Bellantone, R., Brauckhoff, M., Carnaille, B., Cherenko, S., Chiang, F., Dionigi, G., Finck, C., Hartl, D., Kamani, D., Lorenz, K., Miccolli, P., Mihai, R., Miyauchi, A., Orloff, L., Perrier, N., Poveda, M. D., Romanchishen, A., Serpell, J., Sitges‐Serra, A., Sloan, T., Van Slycke, S., Snyder, S., Takami, H., Volpi, E., & Woodson, G.
Venue
The Laryngoscope
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-12-22
Volume
121
Issue
S1
Pages
S1-16
ISSN
  • 0023-852X (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4995
OpenAlex
W2012172660
Cited by
1,047
References
15
FWCI
37.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrophysiologic recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring during thyroid and parathyroid surgery: International standards guideline statement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/lary.21119
The paper
Randolph, G. W., Dralle, H., with the International Intraoperative Monitoring Study Group, Abdullah, H., Barczynski, M., Bellantone, R., Brauckhoff, M., Carnaille, B., Cherenko, S., Chiang, F., Dionigi, G., Finck, C., Hartl, D., Kamani, D., Lorenz, K., Miccolli, P., Mihai, R., Miyauchi, A., Orloff, L., . . . Woodson, G. (2011). Electrophysiologic recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring during thyroid and parathyroid surgery: International standards guideline statement. The Laryngoscope. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.21119

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.