Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 811

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An Observational Trial for Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma in Japanese Patients

Ito, Yasuhiro, Miyauchi, Akira, Inoue, Hiroyuki, Fukushima, Mitsuhiro, Kihara, Minoru, Higashiyama, Takuya, Tomoda, Chisato, Takamura, Yuuki, Kobayashi, Kaoru, Miya, Akihiro·2010·World Journal of Surgery

Abstract

Background: The recent development and spread of ultrasonography and ultrasonography‐guided fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) has facilitated the detection of small papillary microcarcinomas of the thyroid measuring 1 cm or less (PMC). The marked difference in prevalence between clinical thyroid carcinoma and PMC detected on mass screening prompted us to observe PMC unless the lesion shows unfavorable features, such as location adjacent to the trachea or on the dorsal surface of the thyroid possibly invading the recurrent laryngeal nerve, clinically apparent nodal metastasis, or high‐grade malignancy on FNAB findings. In the present study we report comparison of the outcomes of 340 patients with PMC who underwent observation and the prognosis of 1,055 patients who underwent immediate surgery without observation. Methods: Between 1993 and 2004, 340 patients underwent observation and 1,055 underwent surgical treatment without observation. These 1,395 patients were enrolled in the present study. Observation periods ranged from 18 to 187 months (average 74 months). Results: The proportions of patients whose PMC showed enlargement by 3 mm or more were 6.4 and 15.9% on 5‐year and 10‐year follow‐up, respectively. Novel nodal metastasis was detected in 1.4% at 5 years and 3.4% at 10 years. There were no factors related to patient background or clinical features linked to either tumor enlargement or the novel appearance of nodal metastasis. After observation 109 of the 340 patients underwent surgical treatment for various reasons, and none of those patients showed carcinoma recurrence. In patients who underwent immediate surgical treatment, clinically apparent lateral node metastasis (N1b) and male gender were recognized as independent prognostic factors of disease‐free survival. Conclusions: Papillary microcarcinomas that are not associated with unfavorable features can be candidates for observation regardless of patient background and clinical features. If there are subsequent signs of progression, such as tumor enlargement and novel nodal metastasis, it would not be too late to perform surgical treatment. Even though the primary tumor is small, careful surgical treatment including therapeutic modified neck dissection is necessary for N1b PMC patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00268-009-0303-0

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 811

Metadata

Authors
Ito, Y., Miyauchi, A., Inoue, H., Fukushima, M., Kihara, M., Higashiyama, T., Tomoda, C., Takamura, Y., Kobayashi, K., & Miya, A.
Venue
World Journal of Surgery
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-11-30
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
28-35
ISSN
  • 0364-2313 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2323
OpenAlex
W2012247710
Cited by
811
References
0
FWCI
9.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Observational Trial for Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma in Japanese Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00268-009-0303-0
The paper
Ito, Y., Miyauchi, A., Inoue, H., Fukushima, M., Kihara, M., Higashiyama, T., Tomoda, C., Takamura, Y., Kobayashi, K., & Miya, A. (2010). An Observational Trial for Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma in Japanese Patients. World Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-009-0303-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.