Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 234

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program Attenuates Stress and Accelerates Recovery in Patients After Radical Resection for Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Ren, Li, Zhu, Dexiang, Wei, Ye, Pan, Xiangou, Liang, Li, Xu, Jianmin, Zhong, Yunshi, Xue, Zhanggang, Jin, Ling, Zhan, Shaokang, Niu, Weixin, Qin, Xinyu, Wu, Zhaohan, Wu, Zhaoguang·2012·World Journal of Surgery

Abstract

Background: The aim of this trial was to compare the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program with conventional perioperative management in patients who underwent radical resection for colorectal cancer. Methods: A combination of evidence‐based and consensus methodology was used to develop the ERAS protocol. Five hundred ninety‐seven consecutive patients who underwent elective colorectal resection were randomized to either the ERAS (n = 299) or the control group (n = 298). Outcomes relating to nutrition and metabolism index, stress index, and recovery index were measured and recorded. Results: Demographic and operative data were similar between the two groups. Patients in the ERAS group showed improved nutritional status when compared with those of the control group. On postoperative day (POD) 1, the HOMA‐IR (insulin resistance index) of the ERAS group was lower than that of the control group (p < 0.001). The cortisol level of the control group was elevated on both POD 1 (p = 0.007) and POD 5 (p = 0.002) compared to the preoperative level. However, the cortisol level of the ERAS group was not increased until POD 5 (p = 0.001). Reduced levels of TNF‐α, IL‐1β, IL‐6, and IFN‐γ in the ERAS group indicated less postoperative stress responses. In addition, ERAS was associated with accelerated recovery of gastrointestinal function. The postoperative length of stay (p < 0.001) and expense (p < 0.001) for the ERAS group were reduced in comparison to the controls. Twenty‐eight cases in the control group and twenty‐nine in the ERAS group suffered complications, which was not significantly different. Conclusion: The ERAS protocol attenuates the surgical stress response and accelerates postoperative recovery without compromising patient safety.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00268-011-1348-4

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 234

Metadata

Authors
Ren, L., Zhu, D., Wei, Y., Pan, X., Liang, L., Xu, J., Zhong, Y., Xue, Z., Jin, L., Zhan, S., Niu, W., Qin, X., Wu, Z., & Wu, Z.
Venue
World Journal of Surgery
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-11-19
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
407-414
ISSN
  • 0364-2313 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2323
OpenAlex
W2131146665
Cited by
234
References
2
FWCI
12.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program Attenuates Stress and Accelerates Recovery in Patients After Radical Resection for Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00268-011-1348-4
The paper
Ren, L., Zhu, D., Wei, Y., Pan, X., Liang, L., Xu, J., Zhong, Y., Xue, Z., Jin, L., Zhan, S., Niu, W., Qin, X., Wu, Z., & Wu, Z. (2012). Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program Attenuates Stress and Accelerates Recovery in Patients After Radical Resection for Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. World Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1348-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.