Cited by 72Abdominal Surgery and ComplicationsDiverticular Disease and ComplicationsInfectious Aortic and Vascular Conditions

Guided Treatment Improves Outcome of Patients with Enterocutaneous Fistulas

Open access
Visschers, Ruben G. J., van Gemert, Wim G., Winkens, Bjorn, Soeters, Peter B., Olde Damink, Steven W. M.·2012·World Journal of Surgery

Abstract

Background: The present study was designed to evaluate the effects of guided treatment of patients with an enterocutaneous fistula and to evaluate the effect of prolonged period of convalescence on outcome. Methods: All consecutive patients with an enterocutaneous fistula treated between 2006 and 2010 were included in this study. Patient information was gathered prospectively. Treatment of patients focused on sepsis control, optimization of nutritional status, wound care, establishing the anatomy of the fistula, timing of surgery, and surgical principles. Outcome included spontaneous and surgical closure, mortality, and postoperative recurrence. The relationship between period of convalescence and recurrence rate was determined by combining the present prospective cohort with a historical cohort from our group. Results: Between 2006 and 2010, 79 patients underwent focused treatment for enterocutaneous fistula. Cox regression analysis showed that period of convalescence related significantly with recurrence of the fistula (hazard ratio 0.99; 95 % confidence interval 0.98–0.999; p = 0.04). Spontaneous closure occurred in 23 (29 %) patients after a median period of convalescence of 39 (range 7–163) days. Forty‐nine patients underwent operative repair after median period of 101 (range 7–374) days and achieved closure in 47 (96 %). Overall, eight patients (10 %) died. Conclusions: Prolonging period of convalescence for patients with enterocutaneous fistulas improves spontaneous closure and reduces recurrence rate.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00268-012-1663-4

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When a damage-control approach is successful, nutrition support becomes effective, promoting fat-free mass and adequate healing after eventual reoperation.

    “When this approach is successful, nutrition support becomes effective, promoting fat‐free mass (muscle) and adequate healing after eventual reoperation, for instance, to restore”

    From Hypoalbuminemia: Pathogenesis and Clinical Significance (2019) · cites this paper as [139]

    The Patients and methods section (page not provided) describes sepsis control and adequate nutrition as conditions for restorative surgery, and the Results report successful fistula closure after surgery. The paper does not show that nutrition support becomes effective specifically after damage control, promotes fat-free mass, or causes postoperative healing. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Visschers, R. G. J., van Gemert, W. G., Winkens, B., Soeters, P. B., & Olde Damink, S. W. M.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
  • Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre NUTRIM School for Nutrition, Toxicology & Metabolism, Maastricht University PO Box 5800 6202 AZ Maastricht The Netherlands
  • Department of Methodology and Statistics and The School for Public Health and Primary Care Maastricht University P Debyeplein 1 6229 HA Maastricht The Netherlands
Corresponding author
Visschers, Ruben G. J.
Venue
World Journal of Surgery
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-06-06
Volume
36
Issue
10
Pages
2341-2348
ISSN
  • 0364-2313 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2323
OpenAlex
W2077400125
Cited by
72
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • World Journal of Surgery (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
ZonMw (907‐06‐177, 920‐03‐537)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Abdominal Surgery and Complications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Diverticular Disease and Complications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Infectious Aortic and Vascular Conditions
Keywords
enterocutaneous fistula, spontaneous fistula closure, fistula recurrence, sepsis control, nutritional optimization, wound care, timing of surgery, operative repair, mortality
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Intestinal Fistula, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Surgical Procedures, Operative, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review