The DOI matches its Crossref record; 168 of the 168 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations
Open accessAbstract
Background: Protocols for enhanced recovery provide comprehensive and evidence‐based guidelines for best perioperative care. Protocol implementation may reduce complication rates and enhance functional recovery and, as a result of this, also reduce length‐of‐stay in hospital. There is no comprehensive framework available for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Methods: An international working group constructed within the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society constructed a comprehensive and evidence‐based framework for best perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy patients. Data were retrieved from standard databases and personal archives. Evidence and recommendations were classified according to the GRADE system and reached through consensus in the group. The quality of evidence was rated “high”, “moderate”, “low” or “very low”. Recommendations were graded as “strong” or “weak”. Results: Comprehensive guidelines are presented. Available evidence is summarised and recommendations given for 27 care items. The quality of evidence varies substantially and further research is needed for many issues to improve the strength of evidence and grade of recommendations. Conclusions: The present evidence‐based guidelines provide the necessary platform upon which to base a unified protocol for perioperative care for pancreaticoduodenectomy. A unified protocol allows for comparison between centres and across national borders. It facilitates multi‐institutional prospective cohort registries and adequately powered randomised trials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
5 retracted
Perioperative transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks for analgesia after abdominal surgery
Charlton, S., Cyna, A. M., Middleton, P., & Griffiths, J. D. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007705.pub2 · Cited by 270
RetractedDrugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting
Carlisle, J., & Stevenson, C. A. (2006) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004125.pub2 · Cited by 264
RetractedDrugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting
Carlisle, J., & Stevenson, C. A. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004125.pub3 · Cited by 244
RetractedWerawatganon, T., & Charuluxananan, S. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004088.pub3 · Cited by 242
RetractedWerawatganon, T., & Charuluxananan, S. (2005) · The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004088.pub2 · Cited by 223
RetractedGRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad · Cited by 23,305
Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients.
Van den Berghe, G., Wouters, P., Weekers, F., Verwaest, C., Bruyninckx, F., Schetz, M., Vlasselaers, D., Ferdinande, P., Lauwers, P., & Bouillon, R. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa011300 · Cited by 9,977
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes
Ivers, N., Jamtvedt, G., Flottorp, S., Young, J. M., Odgaard-Jensen, J., French, S. D., O'Brien, M. A., Johansen, M., Grimshaw, J., & Oxman, A. D. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000259.pub3 · Cited by 5,485 · cited 1×
“There are also indications that audit per se improves clinical results through feedback [187].”
BackgroundIntensive versus Conventional Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients
(2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0810625 · Cited by 5,119
Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism
Geerts, W. H., Heit, J. A., Clagett, G. P., Pineo, G. F., Colwell, C. W., Anderson, F. A., & Wheeler, H. B. (2001) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.119.1_suppl.132s · Cited by 4,373
Cited by
Essential Elements of Multimodal Analgesia in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Guidelines
Beverly, A., Kaye, A. D., Ljungqvist, O., & Urman, R. D. (2017) · Anesthesiology Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.anclin.2017.01.018 · Cited by 432
Self-citationBrindle, M., Nelson, G., Lobo, D. N., Ljungqvist, O., & Gustafsson, U. O. (2020) · BJS Open · doi:10.1002/bjs5.50238 · Cited by 181
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lassen, K., Coolsen, M. M. E., Slim, K., Carli, F., de Aguilar‐Nascimento, J. E., Schäfer, M., Parks, R. W., Fearon, K. C. H., Lobo, D. N., Demartines, N., Braga, M., Ljungqvist, O., & Dejong, C. H. C.
- Venue
- World Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-09-07
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 240-258
- ISSN
- 0364-2313 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2323
- OpenAlex
- W1977483924
- Cited by
- 473
- References
- 168
- FWCI
- 26.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00268-012-1771-1
- The paper
- Lassen, K., Coolsen, M. M. E., Slim, K., Carli, F., de Aguilar‐Nascimento, J. E., Schäfer, M., Parks, R. W., Fearon, K. C. H., Lobo, D. N., Demartines, N., Braga, M., Ljungqvist, O., & Dejong, C. H. C. (2013). Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations. World Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1771-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
