The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Bariatric Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations
Open accessAbstract
Background: During the last two decades, an increasing number of bariatric surgical procedures have been performed worldwide. There is no consensus regarding optimal perioperative care in bariatric surgery. This review aims to present such a consensus and to provide graded recommendations for elements in an evidence‐based “enhanced” perioperative protocol. Methods: The English‐language literature between January 1966 and January 2015 was searched, with particular attention paid to meta‐analyses, randomised controlled trials and large prospective cohort studies. Selected studies were examined, reviewed and graded. After critical appraisal of these studies, the group of authors reached a consensus recommendation. Results: Although for some elements, recommendations are extrapolated from non‐bariatric settings (mainly colorectal), most recommendations are based on good‐quality trials or meta‐analyses of good‐quality trials. Conclusions: A comprehensive evidence‐based consensus was reached and is presented in this review by the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) Society. The guidelines were endorsed by the International Association for Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition (IASMEN) and based on the evidence available in the literature for each of the elements of the multimodal perioperative care pathway for patients undergoing bariatric surgery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad · Cited by 23,305
Sapolsky, R. M., Romero, L. M., & Munck, A. U. (2000) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv.21.1.0389 · Cited by 7,541
Anti-inflammatory Actions of Glucocorticoids: Molecular Mechanisms
Barnes, P. J. (1998) · Clinical Science · doi:10.1042/cs0940557 · Cited by 1,591
A trial of intraoperative low-tidal-volume ventilation in abdominal surgery
Futier, E., Constantin, J.-M., Paugam-Burtz, C., Pascal, J., Eurin, M., Neuschwander, A., Marret, E., Beaussier, M., Gutton, C., Lefrant, J.-Y., et al. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1301082 · Cited by 1,434
Continuous positive airways pressure for obstructive sleep apnoea in adults
Giles, T., Lasserson, T., Smith, B., White, J., Wright, J., & Cates, C. (2006) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001106.pub2 · Cited by 1,001
Effect of preoperative weight loss in bariatric surgical patients: a systematic review
Cassie, S., Menezes, C., Birch, D. W., Shi, X., & Karmali, S. (2011) · Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.soard.2011.08.011 · Cited by 160
Anderin, C., Gustafsson, U. O., Heijbel, N., & Thorell, A. (2015) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000000839 · Cited by 154 · cited 3×
“Morbidity and mortality rates in association with bariatric surgery are relatively low with 3 and 0.04 % for severe complications and mortality, respectively, within 30 days as reported in the Scandina- vian Obesity Registry (SOReg) [3], and further reductions in these may be difficult to achieve.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationPatient education outcomes in surgery: a systematic review from 2004 to 2010
Ronco, M., Iona, L., Fabbro, C., Bulfone, G., & Palese, A. (2012) · International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare · doi:10.1111/j.1744-1609.2012.00286.x · Cited by 123 · cited 1×
“Two systematic reviews of patient education [23, 24] evaluated outcomes including biophysical, functional, experiential, cognitive, social, ethical and financial parameters.”
BackgroundPostoperative CPAP and BiPAP use can be safely omitted after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
Jensen, C., Tejirian, T., Lewis, C., Yadegar, J., Dutson, E., & Mehran, A. (2008) · Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.soard.2008.05.003 · Cited by 79
Cited by
MacNeill, A. J., Lillywhite, R., & Brown, C. J. (2017) · The Lancet Planetary Health · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(17)30162-6 · Cited by 820
Mechanick, J. I., Apovian, C., Brethauer, S., Garvey, W. T., Joffe, A. M., Kim, J., Kushner, R. F., Lindquist, R., Pessah-Pollack, R., Seger, J., et al. (2020) · Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.soard.2019.10.025 · Cited by 608
Mechanick, J. I., Apovian, C., Brethauer, S., Garvey, W. T., Joffe, A. M., Kim, J., Kushner, R. F., Lindquist, R., Pessah-Pollack, R., Seger, J., et al. (2019) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/gl-2019-0406 · Cited by 510
Enhanced Recovery after Bariatric Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Małczak, P., Pisarska, M., Piotr, M., Wysocki, M., Budzyński, A., & Pędziwiatr, M. (2017) · Obesity Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11695-016-2438-z · Cited by 302
Brindle, M., Nelson, G., Lobo, D. N., Ljungqvist, O., & Gustafsson, U. O. (2020) · BJS Open · doi:10.1002/bjs5.50238 · Cited by 181
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Thorell, A., MacCormick, A. D., Awad, S., Reynolds, N., Roulin, D., Demartines, N., Vignaud, M., Alvarez, A., Singh, P. M., & Lobo, D. N.
- Venue
- World Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-03-04
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2065-2083
- ISSN
- 0364-2313 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2323
- OpenAlex
- W2937857310
- Cited by
- 620
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 48.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
