Cited by 123Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcareEnhanced Recovery After SurgerySurgical site infection prevention

Patient education outcomes in surgery: a systematic review from 2004 to 2010

Ronco, Monica, Iona, Leo, Fabbro, Carmen, Bulfone, Giampiera, Palese, Alvisa·2012·International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: In 2004, Johansson and colleagues, in their systematic review covering the years 1990-2003, documented education interventions and their effectiveness in the treatment of surgical patients. While they provide a review of the state of knowledge until 2003, recent trends in preoperative education and its effects on postoperative patients' outcomes have not been documented in a systematic review. The aim of this study was to describe preoperative educational interventions (including content and delivery time) and postoperative outcomes as considered in studies evaluating the effectiveness for patients undergoing major surgery published from 2004 to 2010. METHODS: A systematic review of preoperative education and its effects on postoperative patient outcomes was undertaken. A search was conducted of the PubMed, CINAHL and EBMR databases, including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Randomised controlled trials, or at least clinical trials including pre-/post-test evaluations, with educational interventions performed by nurses preoperatively and outcomes evaluated postoperatively, and written in English, were included. RESULTS: A total of 19 studies involving 3944 patients were retrieved. Of these, 12 were randomised controlled trials. Interventions were based on verbal education, on written/visual education, or both. The content of interventions varied widely. Frequent outcomes evaluated were anxiety, knowledge, pain and length of stay. Objective knowledge (what a patient retains from education) was the only positive outcome influenced by education. CONCLUSIONS: Current trends in preoperative education are: scheduling education early; increased frequency of message exposure through several interventions and/or reinforcements; content frequently addressing postoperative management; the measurement of outcomes such as patients' cognitive, experiential and biophysiological aspects. Both the clinical and research implications that emerged from the findings are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2012.00286.x

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ronco, M., Iona, L., Fabbro, C., Bulfone, G., & Palese, A.
Affiliations
University of Udine (IT)
Corresponding author
Palese, Alvisa
Venue
International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare
Published
2012-12
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
309-323
ISSN
1744-1595 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2065951578
Cited by
123
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical site infection prevention
Keywords
preoperative patient education, surgical patients, postoperative outcomes, patient knowledge, postoperative anxiety, postoperative pain, length of hospital stay, major surgery
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Preoperative Care, General Surgery, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review