Cited by 40Hernia repair and managementCongenital Anomalies and Fetal SurgeryMedical and Biological Sciences

Nomenclature in Abdominal Wall Hernias: Is It Time for Consensus?

Open access
Parker, Samuel G., Wood, Christopher P. J., Sanders, David L., Windsor, Alastair C. J.·2017·World Journal of Surgery

Abstract

Abdominal wall reconstruction is a rapidly evolving area of surgical interest. Due to the increase in prevalence and size of ventral hernias and the high recurrence rates, the academic community has become motivated to find the best reconstruction techniques. Whilst interrogating the abdominal wall reconstruction literature, we discovered an inconsistency in hernia nomenclature that must be addressed. The terms used to describe the anatomical planes of mesh implantation ‘inlay’, ‘sublay’ and ‘underlay’ are misinterpreted throughout. We describe the misinterpretation of these terms and give evidence of where it exists in the literature. We give three critical arguments of why these misinterpretations hinder advances in abdominal wall reconstruction research. The correct definitions of the anatomical planes, and their respective terms, are described and illustrated. Clearly defined nomenclature is required as academic surgeons strive to improve abdominal wall reconstruction outcomes and lower complication rates.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00268-017-4037-0

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are generally 5 different anatomical compartments for mesh placement: subcutaneous, interposition, retro-rectus, preperitoneal and intra-abdominal.

    “According to recent consensus of nomenclature for defining the planes for the anterior abdominal wall mesh reconstruction, there are generally 5 different anatomical compartments for mesh placement: subcutaneous, interposition, retro-rectus, preperitoneal and intra-abdominal. 10”

    From Caesarean Scar Endometriosis May Require Abdominoplasty (2021) · cites this paper as [10]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [22]Navarra G Musolino C De Marco ML Bartolotta M Barbera A Centorrino T Retromuscular sutured incisional hernia repair: a randomised controlled trial to compare open and laparoscopic approach Surg Lap Endosc 2007 17 2 86 90 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318030ca8b 17450086 · DOI
  2. [23]Olmi S Scaini A Cesana GC Erba L Croce E Laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair: an open randomized controlled study Surg Endosc 2007 21 4 555 559 10.1007/s00464-007-9229-5 17364151 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parker, S. G., Wood, C. P. J., Sanders, D. L., & Windsor, A. C. J.
Affiliations
  • University College Hospital (GB)
  • North Devon District Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Parker, Samuel G.
Venue
World Journal of Surgery
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-05
Volume
41
Issue
10
Pages
2488-2491
ISSN
  • 0364-2313 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2323
OpenAlex
W2611795575
Cited by
40
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3
FWCI
4.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • World Journal of Surgery (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hernia repair and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anatomy › Medical and Biological Sciences
Keywords
abdominal wall hernia, ventral hernia, abdominal wall reconstruction, sublay mesh, terminology inconsistency, hernia recurrence
MeSH terms
Hernia, Ventral, Humans, Terminology as Topic, Recurrence, Surgical Mesh, Consensus, Abdominal Wall, Herniorrhaphy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review