The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Tertiary Peritonitis: Clinical Features of a Complex Nosocomial Infection
Open accessAbstract
The objective of this study was to define risk factors for and the clinical course of recurrent or tertiary peritonitis. Intensive supportive care of patients with life‐threatening intraabdominal infections has led to the emergence of a new clinical syndrome, tertiary peritonitis, defined as the persistence or recurrence of intraabdominal infection following apparently adequate therapy of primary or secondary peritonitis. We undertook a retrospective study of 59 patients admitted with intraabdominal infection to a surgical intensive care unit (ICU). Tertiary peritonitis developed in 74% (44/59) of patients. Despite comparable premorbid health status, source of peritonitis, and admission APACHE II scores, patients with tertiary peritonitis had a significantly longer ICU stay (21.8 ± 14.9 vs. 8.5 ± 7.9 days), more advanced organ dysfunction reflected in higher organ dysfunction scores (13.3 ± 5.1 vs. 7.7 ± 3.3), and higher ICU mortality (64% vs. 33%) than patients with uncomplicated secondary peritonitis. The most common infecting organisms in patients with tertiary peritonitis were Enterococcus,Candida, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Enterobacter. Infectious foci were rarely amenable to percutaneous drainage and were found to be poorly localized at laparotomy. Recurrent, or tertiary, peritonitis is a common complication of intraabdominal infection in patients admitted to an ICU. It differs from uncomplicated secondary peritonitis in its microbial flora and lack of response to appropriate surgical and antibiotic therapy. Like nosocomial pneumonia in the critically ill patient, the syndrome appears to be more a reflection than a cause of adverse outcome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Risk Factors for Hospital-Acquired Candidemia: A Matched Case-Control Study
Wey, S. B. (1989) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.1989.00390100145030 · Cited by 369
Marshall, J. C. (1988) · Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1001/archsurg.1988.01400270043006 · Cited by 328
Cited by
The Surgical Infection Society Revised Guidelines on the Management of Intra-Abdominal Infection
Mazuski, J. E., Tessier, J. M., May, A. K., Sawyer, R. G., Nadler, E. P., Rosengart, M. R., Chang, P. K., O'Neill, P. J., Mollen, K. P., Huston, J. M., et al. (2017) · Surgical Infections · doi:10.1089/sur.2016.261 · Cited by 573
Fluconazole prophylaxis prevents intra-abdominal candidiasis in high-risk surgical patients
Eggimann, P., Francioli, P., Bille, J., Schneider, R., Wu, M.-M., Chapuis, G., Chiolero, R., Pannatier, A., Schilling, J., Geroulanos, S., et al. (1999) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/00003246-199906000-00019 · Cited by 414
Sandven, P., Qvist, H., Skovlund, E., & Giercksky, K. E. (2002) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/00003246-200203000-00008 · Cited by 201
Dupont, H. (2002) · Archives of Surgery · doi:10.1001/archsurg.137.12.1341 · Cited by 163
Mazuski, J. E., Sawyer, R. G., Nathens, A. B., DiPiro, J. T., Schein, M., Kudsk, K. A., & Yowler, C. (2002) · Surgical Infections · doi:10.1089/109629602761624180 · Cited by 131
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Nathens, A. B., Rotstein, O. D., & Marshall, J. C.
- Venue
- World Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-02
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 158-163
- ISSN
- 0364-2313 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2323
- OpenAlex
- W2045799985
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tertiary Peritonitis: Clinical Features of a Complex Nosocomial Infection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s002689900364
- The paper
- Nathens, A. B., Rotstein, O. D., & Marshall, J. C. (1998). Tertiary Peritonitis: Clinical Features of a Complex Nosocomial Infection. World Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002689900364
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.