Cited by 69Cancer therapeutics and mechanismsCancer Treatment and PharmacologyStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials

Phase I clinical trial to determine maximum tolerated dose of oral albendazole in patients with advanced cancer

Pourgholami, Mohammad H., Szwajcer, Michael, Chin, Melvin, Liauw, Winston, Seef, Jonathan, Galettis, Peter, Morris, David L., Links, Matthew·2010·Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology

Abstract

Purpose Albendazole is a potential anticancer agent that is currently under development for the treatment of cancer. We carried out a dose-finding phase I study of oral albendazole in patients with advanced malignancies. Patients and methods Thirty-six patients with refractory solid tumors were enrolled. Albendazole was given orally on a day 1-14 of a 3 weekly cycle, starting at 400 mg BD with dose escalation until 1,200 mg BD. Serial blood samples were collected up to 96 h and also on day 8 of cycles 1 and 4. Results The maximum tolerated dose was 2,400 mg per day (1,200 BD). Myelosuppression was the main dose limiting toxicity. Fatigue and mild gastrointestinal upset were the other major adverse effects. 4 out of 24 assessable patients (16%) had a tumor marker response with a fall of at least 50% from baseline values and another patient had a prolonged period of stable marker response. A decline in plasma vascular endothelial growth factor levels was observed. Conclusions Albendazole was well tolerated on the schedule tested in this trial. The results of this study suggest that the recommended dose for further study is 1,200 mg twice daily for 14 days in a 21-day cycle.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00280-009-1157-8

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The maximum tolerated daily dose of albendazole was found to be 2,400 mg (for 14 days in a 21-day cycle) in 6 patients with advanced cancers, and myelosuppression, including neutropenia, leukopenia, lymphopenia, and thrombocytopenia, was the main dose limiting toxicity in 2 of the 6 patients.

    “Further, the maximum tolerated daily dose of albendazole was found to be 2,400 mg (for 14 days in a 21-day cycle) in 6 patients with advanced cancers, and myelosuppression, including neutropenia, leukopenia, lymphopenia, and thrombocytopenia, was the main dose limting toxicity in 2 of the 6 patients [313].”
  • However, 3 of 18 patients given 2,000-2,400 mg daily for 14 days developed neutropenia and other myelosuppression signs.

    “However, 3 of 18 patients given 2,000–2,400 mg daily for 14 days developed neutropenia and other myelosuppression signs [313].”
  • In a phase 1 clinical trial involving 36 solid tumor patients refractory to conventional anti-cancer therapies, the maximum tolerated dose of oral albendazole found was 2,400 mg per day (1,200 mg b.i.d.), and the recommended dose for further study was 2,400 mg daily for 14 days in a 21-day cycle.

    “The maximum tolerated dose of oral albendazole found in these patients was 2,400 mg per day (1,200 mg b.i.d.), and the recommended dose for further study was 2,400 mg daily for 14 days in a 21-day cycle [313].”
  • Myelosuppression, including neutropenia, leukopenia, lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia, were seen in patients given albendazole at the daily dose of 2,400 mg which were found to be the main dose limiting toxicity.

    “Myelosuppression, including neutropenia, leukopenia, lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia, were seen in patients given albendazole at the daily dose of 2,400 mg which were found to be the main dose limiting toxicity [313].”

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pourgholami, M. H., Szwajcer, M., Chin, M., Liauw, W., Seef, J., Galettis, P., Morris, D. L., & Links, M.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • St George Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Links, Matthew
Venue
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
Published
2009-11-11
Volume
65
Issue
3
Pages
597-605
ISSN
  • 0344-5704 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0843
OpenAlex
W2047104647
Cited by
69
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Keywords
albendazole, maximum tolerated dose, advanced cancer, refractory solid tumors, myelosuppression, dose-limiting toxicity, fatigue, gastrointestinal adverse effects, tumor marker response, vascular endothelial growth factor, oral anticancer drugs, dose escalation
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Agents, Diarrhea, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Administration Schedule, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Male, Metabolic Clearance Rate, Middle Aged, Nausea, Neoplasms, Pain, Albendazole, Treatment Outcome, Area Under Curve

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review