Cited by 19Cancer therapeutics and mechanismsStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsCancer Treatment and Pharmacology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A phase I study of tasisulam sodium (LY573636 sodium), a novel anticancer compound in patients with refractory solid tumors

Open access

Abstract

PURPOSE: This phase I study was carried out to determine the phase II recommended dose of tasisulam sodium (hereafter, tasisulam), a novel anticancer agent with a unique mechanism of action. METHODS: Tasisulam was administered intravenously, every 21 days, in patients with refractory solid tumors using a three-plus-three dose-escalation schema. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were enrolled; the first 34 were treated with a flat dose of tasisulam of up to 2,400 mg, the dose level at which all three patients had dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Controlling for C(max) proved important to reduce the risk of toxicity; therefore, we initially focused on identifying which parameters explained C(max) (end-of-infusion concentration) variability. Pharmacokinetic analysis indicated that C(max) negatively correlates with lean body weight (LBW). Thus, the dosing regimen was revised using a LBW-based algorithm targeting a specific C(max). A loading/chronic dose paradigm was then implemented as pharmacokinetic results revealed a long terminal half-life of tasisulam, likely because of its high-affinity albumin binding. C(max)-based dose escalation was stopped at the 420-μg/mL cohort, in which one of the 16 patients had DLT (transient hepatic transaminase elevation); grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was noted in later cycles in three patients. Although response was not a primary objective, 33% of heavily pretreated patients with post-dose radiological assessments had stable disease. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a novel targeted C(max)-based dosing regimen allowed for the recommendation of a phase II tasisulam dose (loading dose of 420 μg/mL targeted C(max) with all subsequent doses administered at 65% of chronic dose given every 21 days) despite pharmacological challenges posed by high albumin binding.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00280-011-1593-0

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two additional, entirely distinct classes of small-molecule molecular glue degraders have been discovered.

    “Two additional, entirely distinct classes of small-molecule molecular glue degraders have been discovered.”
  • RBM39 (CAPERα) is the direct molecular target responsible for the antitumour effect of aryl sulfonamides, which recruit RBM39 to CRL4DCAF15 for polyubiquitination and proteasomal degradation.

    “Two independent groups identified RNA-binding motif protein 39 (RBM39, also known as CAPERα), a nuclear protein involved in pre-mRNA splicing, as the direct molecular target responsible for the antitumour effect of these sulfonamides, which recruit this splicing factor to the CRL4DCAF15 E3 ubiquitin ligase for polyubiquitination and subsequent proteasomal degradation177–179.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Simon, G. R., Ilaria, R. L., Sovak, M. A., Williams, C. C., Haura, E. B., Cleverly, A. L., Sykes, A. K., Wagner, M. M., de Alwis, D. P., Slapak, C. A., Miller, M. A., & Spriggs, D. R.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Moffitt Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Simon, George R.
Venue
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
Published
2011-03-23
Volume
68
Issue
5
Pages
1233-1241
ISSN
  • 0344-5704 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0843
OpenAlex
W2100483340
Cited by
19
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eli Lilly and Company
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Keywords
refractory solid tumors, lean body weight, pharmacokinetics, albumin binding, dose-limiting toxicity, hematologic toxicity, loading dose, chronic dosing, targeted anticancer agents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Antineoplastic Agents, Benzamides, Chromatography, Liquid, Female, Half-Life, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Sulfonamides, Reproducibility of Results, Maximum Tolerated Dose, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review