Cited by 534

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Preferential activation of capecitabine in tumor following oral administration to colorectal cancer patients

Sch�ller, Johannes, Cassidy, Jim, Dumont, Etienne, Roos, Brigitte, Banken, Ludger, Mori, Kazushige, Reigner, Bruno, Utoh, Masahiro, Weidekamm, Erhard, Durston, Sarah·2000·Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology

Abstract

Purpose [corrected] Capecitabine (Xeloda) is a novel fluoropyrimidine carbamate rationally designed to generate 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) preferentially in tumors. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the preferential activation of capecitabine, after oral administration, in tumor in colorectal cancer patients, by the comparison of 5-FU concentrations in tumor tissues, healthy tissues and plasma. Methods Nineteen patients requiring surgical resection of primary tumor and/or liver metastases received 1,255 mg/m2 of capecitabine twice daily p.o. for 5-7 days prior to surgery. On the day of surgery, samples of tumor tissue, adjacent healthy tissue and blood samples were collected simultaneously from each patient, 2 to 12 h after the last dose of capecitabine had been administered. Concentrations of 5-FU in various tissues and plasma were determined by HPLC. The activities of the enzymes (CD, TP and DPD) involved in the formation and catabolism of 5-FU were measured in tissue homogenates, by catabolic assays. Results The ratio of 5-FU concentrations in tumor to adjacent healthy tissue (T/H) was used as the primary marker for the preferential activation of capecitabine in tumor. In primary colorectal tumors, the concentration of 5-FU was on average 3.2 times higher than in adjacent healthy tissue (P = 0.002). The mean liver metastasis/healthy tissue 5-FU concentration ratio was 1.4 (P = 0.49, not statistically different). The mean tissue/plasma 5-FU concentration ratios exceed…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s002800050043

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 534

Metadata

Authors
Sch�ller, J., Cassidy, J., Dumont, E., Roos, B., Banken, L., Mori, K., Reigner, B., Utoh, M., Weidekamm, E., & Durston, S.
Venue
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
Published
2000-03-06
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
291-297
ISSN
  • 0344-5704
  • 1432-0843
Cited by
534
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review