Cited by 53Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancerGene Regulatory Network AnalysisMathematical Biology Tumor Growth

A multiple timescale analysis of a mathematical model of the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway

Open access
Mirams, Gary R., Byrne, Helen M., King, John R.·2010·Journal of Mathematical Biology

Abstract

The Wnt signalling pathway is involved in stem cell maintenance, differentiation and tissue development. Its disregulation has also been implicated in many cancers. Beta-catenin is a protein that regulates both transcription of many genes and cell-cell adhesion; in response to an external Wnt stimulus the intracellular levels of beta-catenin are controlled by the proteins which make up the Wnt/beta-catenin signalling pathway. In this paper we present a systematic asymptotic analysis of an existing model of the Wnt signalling pathway due to Lee et al. (PLoS Biol 1:116-132, 2003), highlighting the operation of different pathway components over different timescales. Guided by this analysis we derive a simplified model which is shown to retain the essential behaviour of the full Wnt pathway, recreating the accumulation and degradation of beta-catenin in response to a Wnt stimulus.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00285-009-0262-y

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All other simulation studies either used wet-lab data from other publications or did not explicitly refer to wet-lab data at all [29, 30, 33, 34, 39, 41, 53].

    “All other simulation studies either used wet-lab data from other publications or did not explicitly refer to wet-lab data at all [29, 30, 33, 34, 39, 41, 53].”
  • In all provenance graphs but the one by Mirams et al. (2010) [41], at least one Qualitative Model was used by a Building Simulation Model activity to produce the first Simulation Model.

    “In all provenance graphs but the one by Mirams et al. (2010) [41], at least one Qualitative Model was used by a Building Simulation Model activity to produce the first Simulation Model.”
  • Two simulation studies ([35, 41]) show disconnected graphs.

    “Two simulation studies ([35, 41]) show disconnected graphs.”
  • The simulation models developed in [29, 32, 34-36, 39, 41] had neither been calibrated nor validated explicitly, because they used parameter values from other studies.

    “The simulations models developed in [29, 32, 34–36, 39, 41] had neither been calibrated nor validated explicitly, because they used parameter values from other studies.”
  • Some simulation studies resulted in the development of multiple simulation models that are neither extensions nor compositions but rather form a revision or alternative to other simulation models developed in the same study: [33, 39, 41, 46, 48, 49].

    “Some simulation studies resulted in the development of multiple simulation models that are neither extensions nor compositions but rather form a revision or alternative to other simulation models developed in the same study: [33, 39, 41, 46, 48, 49].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 53

Authors
Mirams, G. R., Byrne, H. M., & King, J. R.
Affiliations
University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Mirams, Gary R.
Venue
Journal of Mathematical Biology
Published
2009-03-14
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pages
131-160
ISSN
  • 0303-6812 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1416
OpenAlex
W2060200034
Cited by
53
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Journal of Mathematical Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Royal Society
  • Wolfson Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
Keywords
Wnt/β-catenin signaling, asymptotic analysis, model reduction, stem cell maintenance, cancer
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Models, Biological, Signal Transduction, Feedback, Physiological, Wnt Proteins, beta Catenin, Mathematical Concepts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review