Cited by 199MRI in cancer diagnosisAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment

Diffusion-weighted MRI of soft tissue tumours

Einarsd�ttir, Hildur, Karlsson, Magnus, Wejde, Johan, Bauer, Henrik C. F.·2004·European Radiology

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility of a multi-shot spin-echo echo-planar (SE-EPI) diffusion-weighted sequence in the diagnostic work-up of soft tissue tumours. There were 29 patients, 16 with a benign lesion and 13 with a sarcoma. Four of the sarcomas were examined both before and after radiation therapy. Diffusion-weighted imaging was performed with a multi-shot SE-EPI sequence. The b values were 0 and 600 s/mm(2). Phase navigation and pulse trigging were applied. The apparent diffusion constant (ADC) value of a large region of interest (ROI) representing the lesion was measured and compared to diagnosis and treatment. The ADC values of the benign lesions (mean 1.8 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s) overlapped with non-treated sarcomas (mean 1.7 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s). The ADC value increased in all radiated sarcomas. A multi-shot SE-EPI diffusion imaging sequence of less than 2-min duration is technically feasible in soft tissue tumours of the extremities and the trunk. The ADC values of benign soft tissue tumours and sarcomas overlapped and could not be used to differentiate between the bulk of benign and malignant tumours. However, the increase in ADC values of soft tissue sarcomas after radiotherapy warrants further studies of diffusion imaging for evaluating therapy response.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00330-004-2237-0

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a previous study, ADC values in desmoid tumours (range 1.2-1.9 × 10-3/mm2/s) and nodular fasciitis (1.1 and 2.3 × 10-3/mm2/s) were higher compared to ADC values in AWE.

    “In a previous study, ADC values in desmoid tumours (range: 1.2–1.9 × 10–3/mm2/s) and nodular fasciitis (1.1 and 2.3 × 10–3/mm2/s) [25] were higher compared to ADC values in AWE.”

    From Appearance of abdominal wall endometriosis on MR imaging (2010) · cites this paper as [25]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Einarsd�ttir, H., Karlsson, M., Wejde, J., & Bauer, H. C. F.
Affiliations
Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
Venue
European Radiology
Published
2004-06-01
Volume
14
Issue
6
Pages
959-963
ISSN
  • 0938-7994 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1084
OpenAlex
W1970601452
Cited by
199
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
6.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Hirsla (Landspítali University Hospital) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › MRI in cancer diagnosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
diffusion-weighted imaging, soft tissue tumor, soft tissue sarcoma, benign soft tissue lesions, apparent diffusion coefficient, radiotherapy response, treatment response assessment
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sarcoma, Soft Tissue Neoplasms, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review