The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The evolution of image reconstruction for CT—from filtered back projection to artificial intelligence
Open accessAbstract
The first CT scanners in the early 1970s already used iterative reconstruction algorithms; however, lack of computational power prevented their clinical use. In fact, it took until 2009 for the first iterative reconstruction algorithms to come commercially available and replace conventional filtered back projection. Since then, this technique has caused a true hype in the field of radiology. Within a few years, all major CT vendors introduced iterative reconstruction algorithms for clinical routine, which evolved rapidly into increasingly advanced reconstruction algorithms. The complexity of algorithms ranges from hybrid-, model-based to fully iterative algorithms. As a result, the number of scientific publications on this topic has skyrocketed over the last decade. But what exactly has this technology brought us so far? And what can we expect from future hardware as well as software developments, such as photon-counting CT and artificial intelligence? This paper will try answer those questions by taking a concise look at the overall evolution of CT image reconstruction and its clinical implementations. Subsequently, we will give a prospect towards future developments in this domain. KEY POINTS: • Advanced CT reconstruction methods are indispensable in the current clinical setting. • IR is essential for photon-counting CT, phase-contrast CT, and dark-field CT. • Artificial intelligence will potentially further increase the performance of reconstruction methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search
Silver, D., Huang, A., Maddison, C. J., Guez, A., Sifre, L., van den Driessche, G., Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Panneershelvam, V., Lanctot, M., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16961 · Cited by 15,612
Sidky, E. Y., & Pan, X. (2008) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/53/17/021 · Cited by 1,995
Cited by
Preparing Medical Imaging Data for Machine Learning
Willemink, M. J., Koszek, W. A., Hardell, C., Wu, J., Fleischmann, D., Harvey, H., Folio, L. R., Summers, R. M., Rubin, D. L., & Lungren, M. P. (2020) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2020192224 · Cited by 1,020
Self-citationGreffier, J., Hamard, A., Pereira, F., Barrau, C., Pasquier, H., Beregi, J. P., & Frandon, J. (2020) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-020-06724-w · Cited by 328
How does artificial intelligence in radiology improve efficiency and health outcomes?
van Leeuwen, K. G., de Rooij, M., Schalekamp, S., van Ginneken, B., & Rutten, M. J. C. M. (2022) · Pediatric Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00247-021-05114-8 · Cited by 236
Maassen, O., Fritsch, S., Palm, J., Deffge, S., Kunze, J., Marx, G., Riedel, M., Schuppert, A., & Bickenbach, J. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/26646 · Cited by 125
X-ray-based quantitative osteoporosis imaging at the spine
Löffler, M. T., Sollmann, N., Mei, K., Valentinitsch, A., Noël, P. B., Kirschke, J. S., & Baum, T. (2020) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-019-05212-2 · Cited by 114
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Willemink, M. J., & Noël, P. B.
- Venue
- European Radiology
- Published
- 2018-10-30
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2185-2195
- ISSN
- 0938-7994 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1084
- OpenAlex
- W2899314786
- Cited by
- 603
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 28.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The evolution of image reconstruction for CT—from filtered back projection to artificial intelligence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00330-018-5810-7
- The paper
- Willemink, M. J., & Noël, P. B. (2019). The evolution of image reconstruction for CT—from filtered back projection to artificial intelligence. European Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5810-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.