Cited by 276Liver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis

Diagnostic value of MRI-PDFF for hepatic steatosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a meta-analysis

Gu, Jiulian, Liu, Shousheng, Du, Shuixian, Zhang, Qing, Xiao, Jianhan, Dong, Quanjiang, Xin, Yongning·2019·European Radiology

Abstract

Objective To systematically review studies about the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) in the classification of hepatic steatosis grade in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).Methods Areas under the summary receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, overall diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), diagnostic score, positive likelihood ratio (+LR), and negative likelihood ratio (-LR) for MRI-PDFF in classification of steatosis grades 0 vs. 1-3, 0-1 vs. 2-3, and 0-2 vs. 3 were compared and analyzed.Results A total of 6 studies were included in this meta-analysis (n = 635). The summary AUROC values of MRI-PDFF for classifying steatosis grades 0 vs. 1-3, 0-1 vs. 2-3, and 0-2 vs. 3 were 0.98, 0.91, and 0.90, respectively. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of MRI-PDFF for classifying steatosis grades 0 vs. 1-3, 0-1 vs. 2-3, and 0-2 vs. 3 were 0.93 and 0.94, 0.74 and 0.90, and 0.74 and 0.87, respectively. Summary +LR and -LR of MRI-PDFF for classifying steatosis grades 0 vs. 1-3, 0-1 vs. 2-3, and 0-2 vs. 3 were 16.21 (95%CI, 4.72-55.67) and 0.08 (95%CI, 0.04-0.15), 7.19 (95%CI, 5.04-10.26) and 0.29 (95%CI, 0.22-0.38), and 5.89 (95%CI, 4.27-8.13) and 0.29 (95%CI, 0.21-0.41), respectively.Conclusions Our meta-analysis suggests that MRI-PDFF has excellent diagnostic value for assessment of hepatic fat content and classification of histologic steatosis in patients with NAFLD.Key points • MRI-PDFF has significant diagnostic value for hepatic steatosis in patients with NAFLD. • MRI-PDFF may be used to classify grade of hepatic steatosis with high sensitivity and specificity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00330-019-06072-4

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gu, J., Liu, S., Du, S., Zhang, Q., Xiao, J., Dong, Q., & Xin, Y.
Affiliations
  • Qingdao University (CN)
  • Qingdao Municipal Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Xin, Yongning
Venue
European Radiology
Published
2019-03-21
Volume
29
Issue
7
Pages
3564-3573
ISSN
  • 0938-7994 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1084
OpenAlex
W2923244196
Cited by
276
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 5
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (31770837)
  • Qingdao, Shinan District Science and Technology Development Project Fund (2016-3-016-YY)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Keywords
MRI-PDFF, hepatic steatosis, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, diagnostic accuracy, hepatic fat content, magnetic resonance imaging, non-invasive diagnosis, liver biopsy comparison, diagnostic odds ratio, likelihood ratios, sensitivity and specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Fatty Liver, Humans, Liver, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, ROC Curve, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review