Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 340

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deep learning for liver tumor diagnosis part I: development of a convolutional neural network classifier for multi-phasic MRI

Open access
Hamm, Charlie A., Wang, Clinton J., Savic, Lynn J., Ferrante, Marc, Schobert, Isabel, Schlachter, Todd, Lin, MingDe, Duncan, James S., Weinreb, Jeffrey C., Chapiro, Julius, Letzen, Brian·2019·European Radiology

Abstract

ObjectivesTo develop and validate a proof-of-concept convolutional neural network (CNN)–based deep learning system (DLS) that classifies common hepatic lesions on multi-phasic MRI.MethodsA custom CNN was engineered by iteratively optimizing the network architecture and training cases, finally consisting of three convolutional layers with associated rectified linear units, two maximum pooling layers, and two fully connected layers. Four hundred ninety-four hepatic lesions with typical imaging features from six categories were utilized, divided into training (n = 434) and test (n = 60) sets. Established augmentation techniques were used to generate 43,400 training samples. An Adam optimizer was used for training. Monte Carlo cross-validation was performed. After model engineering was finalized, classification accuracy for the final CNN was compared with two board-certified radiologists on an identical unseen test set.ResultsThe DLS demonstrated a 92% accuracy, a 92% sensitivity (Sn), and a 98% specificity (Sp). Test set performance in a single run of random unseen cases showed an average 90% Sn and 98% Sp. The average Sn/Sp on these same cases for radiologists was 82.5%/96.5%. Results showed a 90% Sn for classifying hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared to 60%/70% for radiologists. For HCC classification, the true positive and false positive rates were 93.5% and 1.6%, respectively, with a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.992. Computation time per lesion was 5.6 ms.ConclusionThis preliminary deep learning study demonstrated feasibility for classifying lesions with typical imaging features from six common hepatic lesion types, motivating future studies with larger multi-institutional datasets and more complex imaging appearances.Key Points• Deep learning demonstrates high performance in the classification of liver lesions on volumetric multi-phasic MRI, showing potential as an eventual decision-support tool for radiologists.• Demonstrating a classification runtime of a few milliseconds per lesion, a deep learning system could be incorporated into the clinical workflow in a time-efficient manner.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00330-019-06205-9

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 340

Metadata

Authors
Hamm, C. A., Wang, C. J., Savic, L. J., Ferrante, M., Schobert, I., Schlachter, T., Lin, M., Duncan, J. S., Weinreb, J. C., Chapiro, J., & Letzen, B.
Venue
European Radiology
Published
2019-04-23
Volume
29
Issue
7
Pages
3338-3347
ISSN
  • 0938-7994 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1084
OpenAlex
W2941555836
Cited by
340
References
4
FWCI
17.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep learning for liver tumor diagnosis part I: development of a convolutional neural network classifier for multi-phasic MRI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00330-019-06205-9
The paper
Hamm, C. A., Wang, C. J., Savic, L. J., Ferrante, M., Schobert, I., Schlachter, T., Lin, M., Duncan, J. S., Weinreb, J. C., Chapiro, J., & Letzen, B. (2019). Deep learning for liver tumor diagnosis part I: development of a convolutional neural network classifier for multi-phasic MRI. European Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06205-9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.