Cited by 144Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingLiver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentAI in cancer detection

Deep learning with ultrasonography: automated classification of liver fibrosis using a deep convolutional neural network

Lee, Jeong Hyun, Joo, Ijin, Kang, Tae Wook, Paik, Yong Han, Sinn, Dong Hyun, Ha, Sang Yun, Kim, Kyunga, Choi, Choonghwan +3 more·2020·European Radiology

Abstract

Objectives The aim of this study was to develop a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) for the prediction of the METAVIR score using B-mode ultrasonography images.Methods Datasets from two tertiary academic referral centers were used. A total of 13,608 ultrasonography images from 3446 patients who underwent surgical resection, biopsy, or transient elastography were used for training a DCNN for the prediction of the METAVIR score. Pathological specimens or estimated METAVIR scores derived from transient elastography were used as a reference standard. A four-class model (F0 vs. F1 vs. F23 vs. F4) was developed. Diagnostic performance of the algorithm was validated on a separate internal test set of 266 patients with 300 images and external test set of 572 patients with 1232 images. Performance in classification of cirrhosis was compared between the DCNN and five radiologists.Results The accuracy of the four-class model was 83.5% and 76.4% on the internal and external test set, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for classification of cirrhosis (F4) was 0.901 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.865-0.937) on the internal test set and 0.857 (95% CI, 0.825-0.889) on the external test set, respectively. The AUC of the DCNN for classification of cirrhosis (0.857) was significantly higher than that of all five radiologists (AUC range, 0.656-0.816; p value < 0.05) using the external test set.Conclusions The DCNN showed high accuracy for determining METAVIR score using ultrasonography images and achieved better performance than that of radiologists in the diagnosis of cirrhosis.Key points • DCNN accurately classified the ultrasonography images according to the METAVIR score. • The AUROC of this algorithm for cirrhosis assessment was significantly higher than that of radiologists. • DCNN using US images may offer an alternative tool for monitoring liver fibrosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00330-019-06407-1

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, J. H., Joo, I., Kang, T. W., Paik, Y. H., Sinn, D. H., Ha, S. Y., Kim, K., Choi, C., Lee, G., Yi, J., & Bang, W.-C.
Affiliations
  • Samsung Medical Center (KR)
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Samsung Electronics (South Korea) (KR)
Corresponding author
Kang, Tae Wook
Venue
European Radiology
Published
2019-09-02
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
1264-1273
ISSN
  • 0938-7994 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1084
OpenAlex
W2972256375
Cited by
144
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 8
FWCI
8.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Radiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Samsung Medical Center (#PHO0132251)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
Keywords
liver fibrosis, METAVIR score, deep convolutional neural networks, B-mode ultrasound, automated image analysis, radiologist comparison
MeSH terms
Radiologists, Deep Learning, Algorithms, Clinical Competence, Female, Humans, Liver Cirrhosis, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, ROC Curve, Ultrasonography, Reproducibility of Results, Elasticity Imaging Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review