Cited by 70Bone health and osteoporosis researchAdvanced X-ray and CT ImagingMedical Imaging and Analysis

Bone mineral density measurements derived from dual-layer spectral CT enable opportunistic screening for osteoporosis

Open access
Roski, Ferdinand, Hammel, Johannes, Mei, Kai, Baum, Thomas, Kirschke, Jan S., Laugerette, Alexis, Kopp, Felix K., Bodden, Jannis +6 more·2019·European Radiology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the in vivo applicability of non-contrast-enhanced hydroxyapatite (HA)-specific bone mineral density (BMD) measurements based on dual-layer CT (DLCT). METHODS: A spine phantom containing three artificial vertebral bodies with known HA densities was measured to obtain spectral data using DLCT and quantitative CT (QCT), simulating different patient positions and grades of obesity. BMD was calculated from virtual monoenergetic images at 50 and 200 keV. HA-specific BMD values of 174 vertebrae in 33 patients (66 ± 18 years; 33% women) were determined in non-contrast routine DLCT and compared with corresponding QCT-based BMD values. RESULTS: Examining the phantom, HA-specific BMD measurements were on a par with QCT measurements. In vivo measurements revealed strong correlations between DLCT and QCT (r = 0.987 [95% confidence interval, 0.963-1.000]; p < 0.001) and substantial agreement in a Bland-Altman plot. CONCLUSION: DLCT-based HA-specific BMD measurements were comparable with QCT measurements in in vivo analyses. This suggests that opportunistic DLCT-based BMD measurements are an alternative to QCT, without requiring phantoms and specific protocols. KEY POINTS: • DLCT-based hydroxyapatite-specific BMD measurements show a substantial agreement with QCT-based BMD measurements in vivo. • DLCT-based hydroxyapatite-specific measurements are on a par with QCT in spine phantom measurements. • Opportunistic DLCT-based BMD measurements may be a feasible alternative for QCT, without requiring dedicated examination protocols or a phantom.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00330-019-06263-z

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [22]Genant HK Universal standardization for dual X-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results J Bone Miner Res 1995 10 997 998 10.1002/jbmr.5650100623 7572326 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roski, F., Hammel, J., Mei, K., Baum, T., Kirschke, J. S., Laugerette, A., Kopp, F. K., Bodden, J., Pfeiffer, D., Pfeiffer, F., Rummeny, E. J., Noël, P. B., Gersing, A. S., & Schwaiger, B. J.
Affiliations
  • TUM Klinikum (DE)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
Corresponding author
Roski, Ferdinand
Venue
European Radiology
Published
2019-05-21
Volume
29
Issue
11
Pages
6355-6363
ISSN
  • 0938-7994 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1084
OpenAlex
W2944864407
Cited by
70
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
8.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Radiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Research Council (ERC-StG-2014 637164, H2020, AdG 695045)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz program)
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (13GW0072C)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Medical Imaging and Analysis
Keywords
bone mineral density, dual-layer spectral CT, osteoporosis screening, opportunistic screening, spine phantom, vertebral body, obesity, virtual monoenergetic images
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Osteoporosis, Spine, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Absorptiometry, Photon, Bone Density, Phantoms, Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review