The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) and European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) joint consensus statement for MR imaging of placenta accreta spectrum disorders
Abstract
Objectives This study was conducted in order to establish the joint Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) and European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders and propose strategies to standardize image acquisition, interpretation, and reporting for this condition with MRI.Methods The published evidence-based data and the opinion of experts were combined using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method and formed the basis for these consensus guidelines. The responses of the experts to questions regarding the details of patient preparation, MRI protocol, image interpretation, and reporting were collected, analyzed, and classified as "recommended" versus "not recommended" (if at least 80% consensus among experts) or uncertain (if less than 80% consensus among experts).Results Consensus regarding image acquisition, interpretation, and reporting was determined using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness Method. The use of a tailored MRI protocol and standardized report was recommended.Conclusions A standardized imaging protocol and reporting system ensures recognition of the salient features of PAS disorders. These consensus recommendations should be used as a guide for the evaluation of PAS disorders with MRI.Key points • MRI is a powerful adjunct to ultrasound and provides valuable information on the topography and depth of placental invasion. • Consensus statement proposed a common lexicon to allow for uniformity in MRI acquisition, interpretation, and reporting of PAS disorders. • Seven MRI features, namely intraplacental dark T2 bands, uterine/placental bulge, loss of low T2 retroplacental line, myometrial thinning/disruption, bladder wall interruption, focal exophytic placental mass, and abnormal vasculature of the placental bed, reached consensus and are categorized as "recommended" for diagnosing PAS disorders.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the imaging modalities of choice for diagnosing PAS antenatally [5, 6].”
From Radiomics-based prediction of FIGO grade for placenta accreta spectrum (2023) · cites this paper as [5]
In the citing paper
“MRI plays an important role, such as for surgical planning and in the assessment of posterior or lateral defects [5, 7, 8].”
From Radiomics-based prediction of FIGO grade for placenta accreta spectrum (2023) · cites this paper as [5]
In the citing paper
“Well-described MR imaging features, such as abnormal vascularisation of the placental bed and focal exophytic mass, are signs of severe PAS; they are usually seen at the level of the bladder, and are therefore included in the inferior placental ROI [5].”
From Radiomics-based prediction of FIGO grade for placenta accreta spectrum (2023) · cites this paper as [5]
In the citing paper
“there was consensus that there would be limited accuracy in delineating the myometrium which in many cases will be thinned to less than 1 mm or not be visible [5]”
From Radiomics-based prediction of FIGO grade for placenta accreta spectrum (2023) · cites this paper as [5]
In the citing paper
“Ultrasound and MRI both rely heavily on reader expertise of the clinician [5, 10].”
From Radiomics-based prediction of FIGO grade for placenta accreta spectrum (2023) · cites this paper as [5]
Citations
Cites
Clinical risk factors for placenta previa–placenta accreta
Miller, D. A. W., Chollet, J. A., & Goodwin, T. M. (1997) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70463-0 · Cited by 1,112
Beets‐Tan, R. G. H., Lambregts, D. M. J., Maas, M., Bipat, S., Barbaro, B., Curvo‐Semedo, L., Fenlon, H. M., Gollub, M. J., Gourtsoyiannis, N., Halligan, S., et al. (2017) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-017-5026-2 · Cited by 1,062
Association Between MRI Exposure During Pregnancy and Fetal and Childhood Outcomes
Ray, J. G., Vermeulen, M. J., Bharatha, A., Montanera, W. J., & Park, A. L. (2016) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.12126 · Cited by 844
Jauniaux, E., Collins, S., & Burton, G. J. (2018) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.067 · Cited by 775
ACR guidance document on MR safe practices: 2013
Safety:, E. P. O. M., Kanal, E., Barkovich, A. J., Bell, C., Borgstede, J. P., Bradley, W. G., FROELICH, J. W., Gimbel, J., Gosbee, J. W., Kuhni‐Kaminski, E., et al. (2013) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.24011 · Cited by 760
Placenta previa/accreta and prior cesarean section.
Clark, S. L., Koonings, P. P., & Phelan, J. P. (1985) · PubMed · Cited by 716
FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: Epidemiology,
Jauniaux, E., Chantraine, F., Silver, R. M., Langhoff‐Roos, J., & Panel, F. T. F. P. A. D. A. M. E. C. (2018) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1002/ijgo.12407 · Cited by 498
Belfort, M. A. (2010) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2010.09.013 · Cited by 484
Shamshirsaz, A. A., Fox, K. A., Salmanian, B., Diaz-Arrastia, C. R., Lee, W., Baker, B. W., Ballas, J., Chen, Q., Van Veen, T. R., Javadian, P., et al. (2015) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2014.08.019 · Cited by 478
FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: Prenatal diagnosis and screening,
Jauniaux, E. R. M., Bhide, A., Kennedy, A., Woodward, P. J., Hubinont, C., Collins, S., & Panel, F. T. F. P. A. D. A. M. E. C. (2018) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1002/ijgo.12408 · Cited by 385
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Palacios-Jaraquemada JMKM, Keith LG (2012) Uterovaginal blood supply: the S1 and S2 segmental concepts and their clinical relevance. Sapiens Publishing Ltd, Meadowbank
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Einerson, B. D., Gilner, J. B., & Zuckerwise, L. C. (2023) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000005229 · Cited by 100
Kapoor, H., Hanaoka, M. M., Dawkins, A. A., & Khurana, A. (2020) · Placenta · doi:10.1016/j.placenta.2020.11.004 · Cited by 87
Patel-Lippmann, K. K., Planz, V. B., Phillips, C. H., Ohlendorf, J. M., Zuckerwise, L. C., & Moshiri, M. (2023) · Radiographics · doi:10.1148/rg.220090 · Cited by 79
Romeo, V., Verde, F., Sarno, L., Migliorini, S., Petretta, M., Mainenti, P. P., D'Armiento, M. R., Guida, M., Brunetti, A., & Maurea, S. (2021) · La radiologia medica · doi:10.1007/s11547-021-01348-6 · Cited by 45
Ultrasonography of the Explanted Uterus in Placenta Accreta Spectrum
Einerson, B. D., Kennedy, A., Silver, R. M., Branch, D. W., Comstock, J. M., & Woodward, P. J. (2023) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000005075 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Jha, P., Pōder, L., Bourgioti, C., Bharwani, N., Lewis, S., Kamath, A., Nougaret, S., Soyer, P., Weston, M., Castillo, R. P., Kido, A., Forstner, R., & Masselli, G.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB)
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
- Université Paris Cité (FR)
- St James's University Hospital (GB)
- University of Miami (US)
- Kyoto University Hospital (JP)
- Paracelsus Medical University (AT)
- Policlinico Umberto I (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Jha, Priyanka
- ORCID
- Venue
- European Radiology
- Published
- 2020-02-10
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2604-2615
- ISSN
- 0938-7994 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1084
- OpenAlex
- W3006094000
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 6
- FWCI
- 21.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Radiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
- Keywords
- placenta accreta spectrum, magnetic resonance imaging, placental invasion, standardized imaging protocol, image reporting, myometrial thinning, diagnostic criteria
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Placenta, Placenta Accreta, Pregnancy, Radiography, Abdominal, Radiology, Societies, Medical, Consensus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review