Cited by 100Maternal and fetal healthcareUterine Myomas and TreatmentsPregnancy and preeclampsia studies

Placenta accreta spectrum

Open access
Einerson, Brett D., Gilner, Jennifer B., Zuckerwise, Lisa C.·2023·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is one of the most dangerous conditions in pregnancy and is increasing in frequency. The risk of life-threatening bleeding is present throughout pregnancy but is particularly high at the time of delivery. Although the exact cause is unknown, the result is clear: Severe PAS distorts the uterus and surrounding anatomy and transforms the pelvis into an extremely high-flow vascular state. Screening for risk factors and assessing placental location by antenatal ultrasonography are essential for timely diagnosis. Further evaluation and confirmation of PAS are best performed in referral centers with expertise in antenatal imaging and surgical management of PAS. In the United States, cesarean hysterectomy with the placenta left in situ after delivery of the fetus is the most common treatment for PAS, but even in experienced referral centers, this treatment is often morbid, resulting in prolonged surgery, intraoperative injury to the urinary tract, blood transfusion, and admission to the intensive care unit. Postsurgical complications include high rates of posttraumatic stress disorder, pelvic pain, decreased quality of life, and depression. Team-based, patient-centered, evidence-based care from diagnosis to full recovery is needed to optimally manage this potentially deadly disorder. In a field that has relied mainly on expert opinion, more research is needed to explore alternative treatments and adjunctive surgical approaches to reduce blood loss and postoperative complications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/aog.0000000000005229

Cites

114 of 114 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MRI is typically used when ultrasound results are inconclusive, offering superior soft tissue contrast and clearer visualization of placental invasion depth and extent.

    “MRI is typically used when ultrasound results are inconclusive, offering superior soft tissue contrast and clearer visualization of placental invasion depth and extent [3].”

    From Machine Learning in Maternity: Early Diagnosis of Placenta Accreta Spectrum (2026) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Magnetic Resonance Imaging section says MRI may add information about disease character or location beyond ultrasound in select cases. It does not say MRI is typically used after inconclusive ultrasound, or that superior soft-tissue contrast provides clearer visualization of invasion depth and extent; it cautions that MRI is not a helpful adjunct in every setting. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Ultrasound is the first-line diagnostic tool for PAS due to its wide availability, non-invasiveness, and cost-effectiveness.

    “PAS is traditionally diagnosed prenatally using imaging modalities such as ultrasound and MRI, with ultrasound being the first-line diagnostic tool due to its wide availability, non-invasiveness, and cost-effectiveness [3,7].”

    From Machine Learning in Maternity: Early Diagnosis of Placenta Accreta Spectrum (2026) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Ultrasound section calls ultrasound the primary screening and diagnostic modality for patients at risk of PAS. The Diagnosis section says MRI’s routine use is limited by higher cost and limited availability of interpretive expertise, supporting the comparison with ultrasound. Our copy does not give non-invasiveness as a reason for using ultrasound first. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Benirschke K, Burton GJ, Baergen R. Pathology of the human placenta (6th ed.). 6 ed. New York: Springer 2012.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Einerson, B. D., Gilner, J. B., & Zuckerwise, L. C.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2023-06-07
Volume
142
Issue
1
Pages
31-50
ISSN
  • 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
  • 1873-233X
OpenAlex
W4379779807
Cited by
100
References
114
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 4
FWCI
36.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K23HD106009)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Keywords
placenta accreta spectrum, placental abruption, antenatal ultrasonography, cesarean hysterectomy, postoperative complications, post-traumatic stress disorder, pelvic pain, risk factors, obstetric hemorrhage, surgical management
MeSH terms
Cesarean Section, Female, Humans, Placenta, Placenta Accreta, Pregnancy, Quality of Life, United States, Ultrasonography, Prenatal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review