The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Establishing national diagnostic reference levels in radiography, mammography, and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry services in Ireland and comparing these with European diagnostic reference levels
Abstract
Objectives The aim of this work was to establish national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in Ireland and compare these to existing European DRLs where available. This work surveyed all radiological facilities providing radiography, mammography, and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) services in Ireland.Methods A list of common procedures and clinical tasks was established. A national database of service providers was used to identify the appropriate medical radiological facilities providing these services. These facilities were issued with an online survey. National DRLs were set as the 75th percentile of the distribution of median values obtained. A national median dose was also established. The broad categorisation of equipment type was also considered. Where differences between DRLs established using different detector types were deemed statistically significant, equipment-specific national DRLs were established.Results National DRLs were established for 12 adult radiography projections. Equipment-specific (computed radiography and digital radiography) adult DRLs were established for four radiography projections. Paediatric DRLs were established for 11 radiography projections, including two based on clinical indications, for a range of paediatric weight categories. National DRLs were established for unilateral two-view mammography and breast tomosynthesis as well as for four DXA clinical indications and projections. All but one Irish DRL figure was found to be below or equal to European data.Conclusions This work provided a unique opportunity to establish national DRLs based on census data for a range of procedures and clinical tasks across radiography, mammography and DXA and compare these with European levels.Clinical relevance statement This work established national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) based on census data for a range of procedures and clinical tasks across radiography, mammography and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. The establishment of national DRLs is an essential component in the optimisation of patient radiation dose.Key points • Diagnostic reference levels are easily measured quantities intended for use as an aid to optimise patient dose and to identify when levels of patient dose are unusually high. • Data from all medical radiological facilities in Ireland was obtained to establish national diagnostic reference level (DRL) values and national median dose values in radiography, x-ray breast imaging and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanning and these were compared to existing European DRLs where available. • National DRL values were established for the first time in breast tomosynthesis, DXA scanning, and paediatric radiography.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“DRLs must be customized to local practices and routinely updated as technology and clinical protocols advance.69”
From Computed Tomography Diagnostic Reference Levels Worldwide and in Jordan: Implications for Patient Dose Reduction (2026) · cites this paper as [69]
Citations
Cites
ICRP Publication 135: Diagnostic Reference Levels in Medical Imaging
Vañó, E., Miller, D. L., Martin, C. J., Rehani, M. M., Kang, K., Rosenstein, M., Ortiz-López, P., Mattsson, S., Padovani, R., & Rogers, A. (2017) · Annals of the ICRP · doi:10.1177/0146645317717209 · Cited by 1,043
Radiation exposure in X-ray-based imaging techniques used in osteoporosis
Damilakis, J. E., Adams, J. E., Guglielmi, G., & Link, T. M. (2010) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-010-1845-0 · Cited by 355
Radiation exposure in bone mineral density assessment
Njeh, C. F., Fuerst, T. P., Hans, D. B., Blake, G. M., & Genant, H. K. (1999) · Applied Radiation and Isotopes · doi:10.1016/s0969-8043(98)00026-8 · Cited by 279
Identification of vertebral fractures: An update
Ferrar, L., Jiang, G., Adams, J. E., & Eastell, R. (2005) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-005-1880-x · Cited by 184
Vertebral Fracture Assessment: The 2005 ISCD Official Positions
Vokes, T., Bachman, D. M., Baim, S., Binkley, N., Broy, S. B., Ferrar, L., Lewiecki, E. M., Richmond, B. J., & Schousboe, J. T. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Densitometry · doi:10.1016/j.jocd.2006.05.006 · Cited by 151
Comparison of effective dose to children and adults from dual X-ray absorptiometry examinations
Blake, G. M., Naeem, M., & Boutros, M. (2005) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2005.11.007 · Cited by 133
Radiation dose with digital breast tomosynthesis compared to digital mammography: per-view analysis
Gennaro, G., Bernardi, D., & Houssami, N. (2017) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-017-5024-4 · Cited by 114
How to establish and use local diagnostic reference levels: an ESR EuroSafe Imaging expert statement
Damilakis, J., Frija, G., Brkljacic, B., Vano, E., Loose, R., Paulo, G., Brat, H., Tsapaki, V., & the European Society of Radiology (2023) · Insights into Imaging · doi:10.1186/s13244-023-01369-x · Cited by 76
Vertebral morphometry studies using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
Blake, G. M., Rea, J. A., & Fogelman, I. (1997) · Seminars in Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0001-2998(97)80029-3 · Cited by 68
Compagnone, G., Baleni, M. C., Pagan, L., et al. (2006) · British Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1259/bjr/57138583 · Cited by 56
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- The Council of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union. Council Directive 2013/59/EURATOM of 5 Dec 2013. Available via: https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/CELEX-32013L0059-EN-TXT.pdf. Accessed 20 Sep 2022
- Health Information and Quality Authority (2020) Diagnostic reference levels, guidance on the establishment, use and review of diagnostic reference levels for medical exposure to ionising radiation. Available via https://www.hiqa.ie/reports-and-publications/guide/guidance-establishment-use-and-review-diagnostic-reference-levels. Accessed 14 Sep 2022
- Hadadi I, Rae W, Clarke J, McEntee M, Ekpo E (2021) Breast cancer detection: comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis across non-dense and dense breasts. Radiology (Lond) 27:1027–1032
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Oglat, A., Shdaifat, S., Sayah, M., Abukonna, A., & Khogali, W. (2026) · Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety · doi:10.2147/dhps.s595721
“69 DRLs are often articulated by modality-specific dosage measurements.”
Metadata
- Authors
- O’Hora, L., Neville, N., Tuffy, J., Craig, A., O’Brien, K., Sugrue, K., McGarry, M., Duggan, B., & Egan, S.
- Affiliations
- Health Information and Quality Authority (IE)
- Corresponding author
- O’Hora, Lee
- Venue
- European Radiology
- Published
- 2023-07-28
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 9469-9478
- ISSN
- 0938-7994 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1084
- OpenAlex
- W4385331331
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 1.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- European Radiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiation Dose and Imaging
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiology practices and education
- Keywords
- diagnostic reference levels, patient radiation dose, dose optimization, radiography, mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, pediatric radiography, computed radiography, digital radiography, Ireland, European comparison, census data, clinical tasks
- MeSH terms
- Diagnostic Reference Levels, Adult, Child, Humans, Ireland, Mammography, Radiation Dosage, Radiography, Reference Values, Absorptiometry, Photon
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review