Cited by 32Green IT and SustainabilityArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability

The ecological footprint of medical AI

Open access
Truhn, Daniel, Müller-Franzes, Gustav, Kather, Jakob Nikolas·2023·European Radiology

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is progressively being woven into the fabric of clinical medicine.Most notably, radiology, as an image-based medical specialty, offers numerous applications of AI, including image reconstruction, image analysis, and clinical decision-making.A rich body of research shows the potential of AI in radiology workflows, and indeed, many AI-based medical devices are already available and have received regulatory approval in major markets for clinical routine use.Existing AI models can support radiologists in a wide range of tasks, reaching from image acquisition [1] to diagnosis [2] and outcome prediction [3].In the future, the development of foundation models, i.e., large multimodal transformer neural networks that can manipulate text, images, and other data types, will conceivably increase the use of AI in radiology and medicine even more [4].The advancements in large language models (LLMs), e.g., Chat-GPT, are a testament to these technical developments, as these LLMs already have the capability to reason about clinically relevant topics across a wide range of domains.Behind this effectiveness of contemporaneous AI models are two primary resources: access to large high-quality datasets and the ability to train huge neural networks with up to hundreds of billions of parameters.As these neural networks are trained and are being deployed at scale, a high computational demand is exerted, which consumes electricity and hence leaves a carbon footprint.With the alarming verdict from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC-2021) suggesting that

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00330-023-10123-2

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 6 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [8]Luccioni AS, Viguier S, Ligozat A-L (2022) Estimating the carbon footprint of BLOOM, a 176B parameter language model. https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.02001 · arXiv
  2. [9]Lacoste A, Luccioni A, Schmidt V, Dandres T (2019) Quantifying the carbon emissions of machine learning. https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.09700 · arXiv
  3. [10]Patterson D, Gonzalez J, Le Q et al (2021) Carbon emissions and large neural network training. https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.10350 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Truhn, D., Müller-Franzes, G., & Kather, J. N.
Affiliations
  • Universitätsklinikum Aachen (DE)
  • University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
Corresponding author
Truhn, Daniel
Venue
European Radiology
Published
2023-08-15
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
1176-1178
ISSN
  • 0938-7994 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1084
OpenAlex
W4385799552
Cited by
32
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 3
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Radiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PUBLISSO (German National Library of Medicine) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen)
Funders
RWTH Aachen University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Green IT and Sustainability
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Keywords
ecological footprint, artificial intelligence, carbon footprint, radiology, large language models, foundation models, large-scale neural networks, energy consumption, artificial intelligence in healthcare

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review