Cited by 81Genetic diversity and population structureGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockHuman-Animal Interaction Studies

Variability of canine microsatellites within and between different dog breeds

Zajc, Irena, Mellersh, Cathryn S., Sampson, Jeff·1997·Mammalian Genome

Abstract

Polymorphic animal microsatellites have proved valuable genetic markers. For this project, the variability of 19 canine microsatellite loci was examined within and between three pure breeds of dog: Greyhounds, Labradors, and German Shepherds. The number of alleles, absolute and relative frequencies, and the statistics that express polymorphism within a breed were determined. The evolutionary relationships among these closely related dog breeds were estimated by genetic distance measures developed for use with microsatellite loci. According to the pairwise genetic distances, Greyhounds and German Shepherds had longer diverse evolutionary histories than Greyhounds and Labradors or Labradors and German Shepherds. Although a few breed-specific alleles were observed, the significant differences between breeds are in their relative frequencies and distribution of the alleles across a locus. None of the three pure dog breeds corresponds to Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. A considerable reduction in intrapopulation variation was observed within three pure breeds, compared with the population of individuals belonging to 15 dog breeds. This reduction was especially pronounced in the Greyhound breed, which expressed the lowest degree of variation. Intrapopulation variations of Labradors and German Shepherds did not differ significantly, that of Labradors being only slightly higher. The intra-species variation of dogs is lower than in humans, mouse, or rat, but similar to that in domestic animals, probably reflecting similarly high inbreeding coefficients. However, some highly informative loci were common to all dog breeds tested so far. Such population data are necessary for mapping studies and linkage analysis in dogs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s003359900386

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dogs have lower intraspecific variation than humans or mice.

    “In fact, dogs have lower intraspecific variation than humans or mice [136].”

    From Ethical Concerns about Fashionable Dog Breeding (2024) · cites this paper as [136]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zajc, I., Mellersh, C. S., & Sampson, J.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Biology (SI)
  • Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
Venue
Mammalian Genome
Published
1997-03
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
182-185
ISSN
  • 0938-8990 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1777
OpenAlex
W2038869704
Cited by
81
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Mammalian Genome (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Keywords
dog breeds, greyhounds, Labrador Retriever, German Shepherd, genetic polymorphism, allele frequency, genetic distance, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, inbreeding, intrapopulation variation, genetic markers, linkage mapping
MeSH terms
Alleles, Animals, Dogs, Gene Frequency, Species Specificity, Genetic Variation, Microsatellite Repeats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review