The shark Chiloscyllium griseum can orient using turn responses before and after partial telencephalon ablation
Abstract
This study assessed spatial memory and orientation strategies in Chiloscyllium griseum. In the presence of visual landmarks, six sharks were trained in a fixed turn response. Group 1 started from two possible compartments approaching two goal locations, while group 2 started from and approached only one location, respectively. The learning criterion was reached within 9 ± 5.29 (group 1) and 8.3 ± 3.51 sessions (group 2). Transfer tests revealed that sharks had applied a direction strategy, possibly in combination with some form of place learning. Without visual cues, sharks relied solely on the former. To identify the underlying neural substrate(s), telencephalic were lesioned and performance compared before and after surgery. Ablation of the dorsal and medial pallia only had an effect on one shark (group 1), indicating that the acquisition and retention of previously gained knowledge were unaffected in the remaining four individuals. Nonetheless, the shark re-learned the task. In summary, C. griseum can utilize fixed turn responses to navigate to a goal; there is also some evidence for the use of external visual landmarks while orienting. Probably, strategies can be used alone or in combination. Neither the dorsal nor medial pallium seems to be responsible for the acquisition and processing of egocentric information.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some laboratory studies in sharks and stingrays suggest that elasmobranchs may be able to use allocentric spatial strategies based on some kind of map-like spatial memory.
“some laboratory studies in sharks and stingrays suggest that elasmobranchs may be also able to use allocentric spatial strategies based on some kind of map-like spatial memory”
From Spatial Cognition in Teleost Fish: Strategies and Mechanisms (2021) · cites this paper as [103]
Since elasmobranchs are considered a sister clade of actinopterygian fish, these results suggest the possibility that cognitive mapping is an ancestral navigational strategy that appeared early during vertebrate evolution.
“Since elasmobranchs are considered a sister clade of actinopterygian fish, these results suggest the possibility that cognitive mapping is an ancestral navigational strategy that appeared early during vertebrate evolution.”
From Spatial Cognition in Teleost Fish: Strategies and Mechanisms (2021) · cites this paper as [103]
Cites
Cognitive maps in rats and men
Tolman, E. C. (1948) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0061626 · Cited by 6,641 · see citing works
Conservation of Spatial Memory Function in the Pallial Forebrain of Reptiles and Ray-Finned Fishes
Rodrı́guez, F., López, J. C., Vargas, J. P., Gómez, Y., Broglio, C., & Salas, C. (2002) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.22-07-02894.2002 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
The Forebrain of Gnathostomes: In Search of a Morphotype; pp. 275–288
Northcutt, R. G. (2008) · Brain, Behavior and Evolution · doi:10.1159/000113279 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Broglio, C., Gómez, A., Durán, E., Ocaña, F. M., Jiménez-Moya, F., Rodríguez, F., & Salas, C. (2005) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2005.03.021 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Durán, E., Ocaña, F. M., Broglio, C., Rodríguez, F., & Salas, C. (2010) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2010.06.010 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Place and cue learning in turtles
López, J. C., Rodríguez, F., Gómez, Y., Vargas, J. P., Broglio, C., & Salas, C. (2000) · Animal Learning & Behavior · doi:10.3758/bf03200270 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Spatial Cognition in Teleost Fish: Strategies and Mechanisms
Rodríguez, F., Quintero, B., Amores, L., Madrid, D., Salas-Peña, C., & Salas, C. (2021) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani11082271 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fuss, T., Bleckmann, H., & Schluessel, V.
- Affiliations
- University of Bonn (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Fuss, Theodora
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Physiology A
- Published
- 2013-10-10
- Volume
- 200
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-35
- ISSN
- 0340-7594 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1351
- OpenAlex
- W1966624862
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 3.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Comparative Physiology A (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
- Keywords
- tiger shark, spatial orientation, spatial memory, visual landmarks, place learning, dorsal pallium, medial pallium, egocentric navigation, learning and memory
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cues, Female, Goals, Male, Motor Activity, Neuropsychological Tests, Orientation, Photic Stimulation, Practice, Psychological, Sharks, Space Perception, Task Performance and Analysis, Telencephalon, Transfer, Psychology, Visual Perception, Maze Learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review