CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 233Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyComparative Animal Anatomy Studies

The Forebrain of Gnathostomes: In Search of a Morphotype; pp. 275–288

Northcutt, R. Glenn·2008·Brain, Behavior and Evolution
DOI 10.1159/000113279
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A morphotype of the forebrain of gnathostomes, i.e. those characters that must have been present in the forebrain of ancestral gnathostomes, was generated by using out-group analysis to identify the shared primitive characters present in the forebrains of extant gnathostomes. The nature of morphotypes and the steps in generating a morphotype are described. Because hypotheses of phylogenetic relationships profoundly affect the resulting morphotype, current hypotheses of gnathostome interrelationships are reviewed, and particular attention is paid to the problematic relationships of lobe-finned fishes. Ontogenetic studies provide the most common basis for how neural characters are grouped, and a review of the developmental literature indicates that gnathostome forebrains are segmented, with the diencephalon arising from a rostral parencephalic neuromere, which subsequently forms anterior and posterior divisions, and a more caudal synencephalic neuromere. Unfortunately, there is no agreement concerning the number of segments that form the secondary prosencephalon (telencephalon and hypothalamus). For this reason, the characters of the secondary prosencephalon must be analyzed in a topological manner. An out-group analysis of the characters of the diencephalon of extant gnathostomes reveals that the diencephalon of ancestral gnathostomes must have arisen from three segments: an anterior parencephalic segment, which gave rise to intermediate, ventrolateral and ventromedial thalamic nuclei; a posterior parencephalic segment, which gave rise to dorsal and ventral habenular nuclei, anterior, dorsal posterior, dorsal central, and, possibly, lateral posterior thalamic nuclei, and posterior tubercular nuclei; a synencephalic segment, which gave rise to pretectal nuclei, accessory optic nuclei and the nucleus of the medial longitudinal fascicle. The pretectal and posterior tubercular regions of ray-finned fishes appear to be highly derived, due to extensive cellular proliferations that give rise to numerous nuclei. The secondary prosencephalon of ancestral gnathostomes was probably divided rostrally into inverted and evaginated cerebral hemispheres, with paired olfactory bulbs arising directly from the hemispheres, and caudally into preoptic and hypothalamic areas. The cerebral hemispheres likely comprised a dorsally situated pallium divided into medial, dorsal and lateral pallial formations, as well as an intercalated pallial nucleus situated ventrolateral to the lateral pallium, and a ventrally situated subpallium divided medially into septal nuclei and a medial amygdalar nucleus and laterally into a corpus striatum. Both pallial and subpallial centers of ancestral gnathostomes probably received ascending thalamic and posterior tubercular inputs, with telencephalic efferent pathways terminating primarily in the hypothalamus, posterior tubercle and midbrain tegmentum. An out-group analysis further indicates that some taxa in each gnathostome radiation exhibit highly derived telencephalic characters due to the independent expansion of one or more pallial formations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000113279

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The pallial area considered homologous to the hippocampus in teleost fish is the dorsolateral telencephalic region.

    “Taking into account the process of telencephalic eversion in teleost fish and the fact that the hippocampus originates from the most distal region of the embryonic prosencephalic alar plate in land vertebrates, the pallial area considered homologous to the hippocampus in teleost fish is the dorsolateral telencephalic region [158,159,170,171,172,173].”

    From Spatial Cognition in Teleost Fish: Strategies and Mechanisms (2021) · cites this paper as [172]

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Northcutt, R. G.
Affiliations
Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US)
Corresponding author
Northcutt, R. Glenn
Venue
Brain, Behavior and Evolution
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2008-01-08
Volume
46
Issue
4-5
Pages
275-288
ISSN
  • 0006-8977 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9743
DOI
10.1159/000113279
OpenAlex
W2122223920
Cited by
233
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 15
FWCI
6.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Brain Behavior and Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
Keywords
morphotypes, thalamic nuclei, habenula, pretectal nuclei, cerebral hemispheres, pallium, subpallium, olfactory bulb, lobe-finned fishes, phylogenetic relationships, Actinopterygii
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Evolution, Thalamus, Prosencephalon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review