Cited by 30Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAdrenal Hormones and DisordersStress Responses and Cortisol

Fecal steroid monitoring for assessing gonadal and adrenal activity in the golden eagle and peregrine falcon

Staley, Airica M., Blanco, Juan M., Dufty, Alfred M., Wildt, David E., Monfort, Steven L.·2007·Journal of Comparative Physiology B

Abstract

We examined the efficacy of noninvasive monitoring of endocrine function via fecal steroid immunoassays in the golden eagle and peregrine falcon. High-pressure liquid chromatography analyses of fecal glucocorticoid metabolites (fGCM) revealed that minor percentages of immunoreactive fGCM co-eluted with [(3)H]corticosterone in both sexes of the eagle (2.5-2.7%) and falcon (7.5-11.9%). In contrast, most fecal estrogen metabolites in eagle and falcon females co-eluted with radiolabeled estradiol-17beta ([(3)H]; 57.6, 64.6%, respectively) or estrone ([(3)H]; 26.9, 4.1%, respectively). Most fecal progestin metabolite immunoreactivity in the female eagle (24.8%) and falcon (21.7%) co-eluted with progesterone ([(14)C]). Most fecal androgen metabolite immunoreactivity in eagle (55.8%) and falcon (63.7%) males co-eluted with testosterone ([(14)C]). Exogenous adrenocorticotropin hormone induced increased fGCM excretion above pre-treatment in both species, but only significantly (P < 0.05) in the eagle. Both species showed increased fGCM after saline administration, suggesting the detection of 'handling stress.' Both species exhibited enterohepatic and renal recirculation of administered steroids as demonstrated by biphasic and triphasic excretion patterns. Thus, noninvasive fecal hormone monitoring is a valid and promising tool for assessing gonadal and adrenal status in rare and threatened birds-of-prey.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00360-007-0159-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Staley, A. M., Blanco, J. M., Dufty, A. M., Wildt, D. E., & Monfort, S. L.
Affiliations
  • Smithsonian Institution (US)
  • Boise State University (US)
Corresponding author
Staley, Airica M.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Physiology B
Published
2007-04-27
Volume
177
Issue
6
Pages
609-622
ISSN
  • 0174-1578 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-136X
OpenAlex
W2014884815
Cited by
30
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Comparative Physiology B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarWorks (Boise State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Smithsonian Institution
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
golden eagle, Falco peregrinus, raptors, glucocorticoid metabolites, ACTH, handling stress, enterohepatic circulation, gonadal function, adrenal function
MeSH terms
Adrenal Cortex Function Tests, Adrenocorticotropic Hormone, Androgens, Animals, Animals, Wild, Carbon Radioisotopes, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Corticosterone, Estradiol, Estrogens, Estrone, Feces, Female, Glucocorticoids, Male, Progesterone, Radioimmunoassay, Sodium Chloride, Species Specificity, Stress, Physiological, Testosterone, Eagles, Progesterone Congeners, Falconiformes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review