Cited by 28Physiological and biochemical adaptationsEvolution and Paleontology StudiesComparative Animal Anatomy Studies

The allometry of rodent intestines

Lovegrove, Barry G.·2010·Journal of Comparative Physiology B

Abstract

This study examined the allometry of the small intestine, caecum, colon and large intestine of rodents (n = 51) using a phylogenetically informed approach. Strong phylogenetic signal was detected in the data for the caecum, colon and large intestine, but not for the small intestine. Most of the phylogenetic signal could be attributed to clade effects associated with herbivorous versus omnivorous rodents. The herbivorous rodents have longer caecums, colons and large intestines, but their small intestines, with the exception of the desert otomyine rodents, are no different to those of omnivorous rodents. Desert otomyine rodents have significantly shorter small intestines than all other rodents, reflecting a possible habitat effect and providing a partial explanation for the low basal metabolic rates of small desert mammals. However, the desert otomyines do not have shorter colons or large intestines, challenging claims for adaptation to water retention in arid environments. Data for the Arvicolidae revealed significantly larger caecums and colons, and hence longer large intestines, with no compensatory reduction in the length of the small intestine, which may explain how the smallest mammalian herbivores manage to meet the demands of a very high mass-specific metabolic rate. This study provides phylogenetically corrected allometries suitable for future prediction testing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00360-009-0437-2

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Large-scale studies that accounted for phylogeny did not confirm an association between diet and intestinal length.

    “By contrast, large-scale studies that accounted for phylogeny did not confirm an association between diet and intestinal length [15-19] or GIT complexity [20].”
  • The negative relationship between precipitation/AET and colon length may not be consistent within specific mammal groups.

    “even though this pattern may not be consistent within specific mammal groups [18].”
  • As previously described for different datasets except for a study in rodents, intestinal lengths scale at a higher exponent than expected based on simple geometry (i.e., positive allometry at an exponent > 0.33).

    “As previously described for different datasets [15-17, 23, 26] except for a study in rodents [18], intestinal lengths scale at a higher exponent than expected based on simple geometry (i.e., positive allometry at an exponent > 0.33).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lovegrove, B. G.
Affiliations
University of KwaZulu-Natal (ZA)
Corresponding author
Lovegrove, Barry G.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Physiology B
Published
2010-01-09
Volume
180
Issue
5
Pages
741-755
ISSN
  • 0174-1578 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-136X
OpenAlex
W2024594933
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Comparative Physiology B (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
Keywords
small intestine, cecum, colon, large intestine, phylogenetic signal, herbivorous rodents, voles, basal metabolic rate, water retention, habitat adaptation, mass-specific metabolic rate
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Body Weight, Cecum, Climate, Colon, Biological Evolution, Intestine, Large, Intestine, Small, Intestines, Phylogeny, Rodentia, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review