Mammalian intestinal allometry, phylogeny, trophic level and climate
Open accessAbstract
An often-stated ecomorphological assumption that has the status of ‘textbook knowledge’ is that the dimensions of the digestive tract correlate with diet, where herbivores—consuming diets of lower digestibility—have longer intestinal tracts than faunivores—consuming diets of higher digestibility. However, statistical approaches have so far failed to demonstrate this link. Here, we collated data on the length of intestinal sections and body mass of 519 mammal species, and test for various relationships with trophic, climatic and other biological characteristics. All models showed a strong phylogenetic signal. Scaling relationships with body mass showed positive allometry at exponents greater than 0.33, except for the caecum, which is particularly large in smaller species. Body mass was more tightly linked to small intestine than to large intestine length. Adding a diet proxy to the relationships increased model fit for all intestinal sections, except for the small intestine when accounting for phylogeny. Thus, the diet has a main effect on the components of the large intestine, with longer measures in herbivores. Additionally, measures of habitat aridity had a positive relationship with large intestine length. The small intestine was longer in species from colder habitats at higher latitudes, possibly facilitating the processing of peak intake rates during the growing season. This study corroborates intuitive expectations on digestive tract anatomy, while the dependence of significant results on large sample sizes and inclusion of specific taxonomic groups indicates that the relationships cannot be considered fixed biological laws.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The study compiles intestinal length and body mass data for 519 mammal species and tests allometry, phylogeny, diet, and climate. It finds strong phylogenetic signal and positive allometry for most intestinal sections, with diet mainly affecting large-intestine sections and climate/latitude linked to small and large intestine length.
Key findings
- Strong phylogenetic signal was present: Pagel’s λ 0.97–0.99 and Blomberg’s K 0.58–0.76; PGLS λ > 0.9. All intestinal lengths scaled positive allometrically (exponents > 0.33) except the caecum, which scaled negative allometrically. Body mass was more tightly linked to small intestine than large intestine length (ΔAICc GLS = 357, PGLS = 135 versus large intestine; caecum/colon ΔAICc GLS > 308, PGLS > 178).
- Adding a diet proxy increased model fit for all intestinal sections in GLS; in PGLS it improved large intestine fit (ΔAICc 15–25) but not small intestine fit (ΔAICc = 1.7 less supported, trophic proxy not significant). %faunivory was negatively related to length. Diet effects varied by taxon: no effect in Primates, Eulipotyphla, Carnivora, and Artiodactyla; effects occurred in Marsupialia and Afrotheria (total and large intestine), Chiroptera (total intestine), and Rodentia (large intestine).
- Higher precipitation or actual evapotranspiration was linked to shorter large intestine/colon lengths, while small intestine length increased at higher absolute latitude and colder temperatures. For total intestine, the best GLS model included diet and latitude, and the best PGLS model included diet and temperature. Volant mammals had shorter total intestines in GLS and PGLS; being marine was not significant individually; forestomach presence was positive in GLS but not PGLS.
Methods
- Literature compilation plus unpublished post-mortem data; final database included total intestine for 519 species, small intestine 397, large intestine 387, caecum 352, and colon/rectum 370. Body mass and intestinal section lengths were recorded, with weighted means correcting for sample size.
- Biological traits included diet from EltonTraits, classified by %faunivory and 70%/90% cutoffs, plus volant, marine, and forestomach status; climate variables from PanTHERIA included latitude, precipitation, temperature, and actual evapotranspiration. A phylogenetic tree was pruned to the 519 species with data.
- Analyses used linear regressions on log-transformed data with GLS and PGLS, λ estimated by maximum likelihood, and AICc model comparison with ΔAICc > 2. Phylogenetic signal was estimated with Blomberg’s K and Pagel’s λ.
Limitations
- Stated: typical constraints of large literature compilations apply; the authors could not account for diet actually ingested in the months before measurement or during ontogeny, and intestinal flexibility varies among species. The data are recommended for broad patterns across many species, not for comparing a specific pair of species. The functional units of the colon cannot be separated, so colon/rectum length may reflect adaptations to both herbivory and arid environments.
- Stated: absolute statements are cautioned against. Based on 519 species, the PGLS model relating total intestinal length to body mass and diet had better support than body mass alone (ΔAIC = 3), but in reduced datasets of 387 or 351 species both models were equally supported (ΔAIC = 1.9 and 0). Diet effects depend on taxonomic level and sample composition, and defining “diet” consistently across taxa is problematic.
- Evident: the study is observational and correlational, with no experimental manipulation; sample sizes and taxonomic coverage are uneven across intestinal sections (e.g., limited bat data for small intestine); diet data sometimes came from the closest taxonomic relative when species data were missing; climate variables came from a database; and GLS/PGLS discrepancies indicate results depend on accounting for phylogeny.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
7 of 55 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation§ Background · p. 4
Large-scale studies that accounted for phylogeny did not confirm an association between diet and intestinal length.
“By contrast, large-scale studies that accounted for phylogeny did not confirm an association between diet and intestinal length [15-19] or GIT complexity [20].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 5 sources checked- cites [15] 15. Lavin S.R., Karasov W.H., Ives A.R., Middleton K.M., Garland T. 2008 Morphometrics of the avian small intestine compared with that of nonflying mammals: a phylogenetic approach. Physiol Biochem Zool 81 , 526-550. source
- cites [16] 16. McGrosky A., Codron D., Müller D.W.H., Navarrete A., Isler K., Hofmann R.R., Clauss M. 2019 Gross intestinal morphometry and allometry in ruminants. J Morphol 280 , 1254-1266.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [17] 17. McGrosky A., Meloro C., Navarrete A., Heldstab S.A., Kitchener A.C., Isler K., Clauss M. 2019 Gross intestinal morphometry and allometry in primates. Am J Primatol 81 , e23035.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [18] 18. Lovegrove B.G. 2010 The allometry of rodent intestines. J Comp Physiol B 180 , 741-755. source
- cites [19] 19. Smith H.F., Parker W., Kotzé S.H., Laurin M. 2017 Morphological evolution of the mammalian cecum and cecal appendix. Comptes Rendus Palevol 16 , 39-57. source
- Findingcitation§ Discussion · p. 16
Volant mammals had shorter total intestines than terrestrial mammals.
“Similar to previous findings, volant mammals had shorter total intestines than terrestrial mammals [15, 21, 22]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [15] 15. Lavin S.R., Karasov W.H., Ives A.R., Middleton K.M., Garland T. 2008 Morphometrics of the avian small intestine compared with that of nonflying mammals: a phylogenetic approach. Physiol Biochem Zool 81 , 526-550. source
- cites [21] 21. Price E.R., Brun A., Caviedes-Vidal E., Karasov W.H. 2015 Digestive adaptations of aerial lifestyles. Physiology 30 , 69-78. source
- cites [22] 22. Caviedes-Vidal E., McWhorter T.J., Lavin S.R., Chediack J.G., Tracy C.R., Karasov W.H. 2007 The digestive adaptation of flying vertebrates: high intestinal paracellular absorption compensates for smaller guts. PNAS 104 , 19132-19137. source
The Results and Discussion report that bats had significantly shorter intestines than comparably sized nonflying mammals. The paper specifies its finding as shorter small intestines, however, and does not establish that bats had shorter total intestinal length. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation§ Discussion · p. 15
Available data does not suggest a difference in digestive processes for protein and fat between herbivores, omnivores or carnivores.
“Available data does not suggest a difference in digestive processes for protein and fat between herbivores, omnivores or carnivores [68]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [68] 68. Richard O.K., Codron D., Hagen K.B., Südekum K.-H., Clauss M. 2017 Little differences in digestive efficiency for protein and fat in mammals of different trophic guilds and digestive strategies: source
- Premisecitation§ Discussion · p. 16
Increased paracellular absorption compared to other mammals compensates for shorter intestines.
“Additionally, increased paracellular absorption compared to other mammals compensates for shorter intestines [22].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] 22. Caviedes-Vidal E., McWhorter T.J., Lavin S.R., Chediack J.G., Tracy C.R., Karasov W.H. 2007 The digestive adaptation of flying vertebrates: high intestinal paracellular absorption compensates for smaller guts. PNAS 104 , 19132-19137. source
The Results and Discussion report higher paracellular absorption in small birds and bats than in nonflying mammals. The paper also finds shorter small intestines in those flying vertebrates, but describes compensation as a hypothesis consistent with the data, rather than an established effect. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data§ Abstract · p. 2
The small intestine was longer in species from colder habitats at higher latitudes.
“The small intestine was longer in species from colder habitats at higher latitudes, possibly facilitating the processing of peak intake rates during the growing season.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data§ Results · p. 7
A final database comprised length data for the total intestinal tract (519 species), the small intestine (397 species), the large intestine (387 species), the caecum (352 species) and the colon/rectum (370 species).
“A final database comprised length data for the total intestinal tract (519 species), the small intestine (397 species), the large intestine (387 species), the caecum (352 species) and the colon/rectum (370 species).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract · p. 2
Measures of habitat aridity had a positive relationship with large intestine length.
“Additionally, measures of habitat aridity had a positive relationship with large intestine length.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract · p. 2
Adding a diet proxy to the relationships increased model fit for all intestinal sections, except for the small intestine when accounting for phylogeny.
“Adding a diet proxy to the relationships increased model fit for all intestinal sections, except for the small intestine when accounting for phylogeny.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract · p. 2
Body mass was more tightly linked to small intestine than to large intestine length.
“Body mass was more tightly linked to small intestine than to large intestine length.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ Abstract · p. 2
All models showed a strong phylogenetic signal.
“All models showed a strong phylogenetic signal.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract · p. 2
The caecum is particularly large in smaller species.
“Scaling relationships with body mass showed positive allometry at exponents >0.33, except for the caecum, which is particularly large in smaller species.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract · p. 2
Scaling relationships with body mass showed positive allometry at exponents >0.33 for intestinal sections other than the caecum.
“Scaling relationships with body mass showed positive allometry at exponents >0.33, except for the caecum, which is particularly large in smaller species.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Table S2 Summary statistics for allometric scaling as log(y) = a + b log(body mass), or y = (10 a ) BM b (significant parameters in bold ) · p. 31
In GLS models of total intestine length across 519 mammal species, %digestible plants has a positive coefficient of 0.10 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.16), controlling for body mass.
“| %digestible plants | -60.2 | 130.3 | c | 0.10 (0.03 to 0.16) | 0.93 (0.88 to 0.96) | -478.1 | 4.4 | 0.03 (-0.04 to 0.11) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results · p. 9
For all intestine sections, %faunivory was negatively related to length.
“For all intestine sections, %faunivory was negatively related to length (Fig. 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results · p. 10
For the caecum, the models including latitude and temperature were equally supported in GLS.
“For the caecum, the models including latitude and temperature were equally supported in GLS (ΔAIC c < 2; ΔAIC c to other models > 10).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results · p. 10
For both the large intestine and the colon/rectum, the best models included diet and either AET or precipitation in GLS.
“For both the large intestine and the colon/rectum, the best models included diet and either AET or precipitation in GLS (ΔAIC c < 2; ΔAIC c to other models > 5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ Discussion · p. 16
Precipitation and actual evapotranspiration were negatively related with colon/rectum length (and hence large intestine length).
“The findings that both precipitation and actual evapotranspiration were negatively related with colon/rectum and hence large intestine length support the concept that animals in more xeric environments need more intestinal capacity for water reabsorption [16, 26, 27]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Conclusions · p. 17
Effects of dietary niches are particularly evident in the large intestine, caecum, and colon.
“The effects of dietary niches are particularly evident in sections of the large intestine, the caecum and the colon,”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results · p. 9
Being marine was not a significant factor for total intestine length when assessed individually with body mass.
“When assessed individually with body mass, being volant had a negative relationship with total intestine length in both GLS and PGLS (Fig. S5A); being marine was not a significant factor; and having a forestomach had a positive relationship with total intestine length in GLS but not in PGLS (Fig. S5B; Table S6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results · p. 10
Higher precipitation or AET (i.e., a habitat with more moisture) were linked to shorter intestinal lengths.
“Higher precipitation or AET (i.e., a habitat with more moisture) were linked to shorter intestinal lengths (Fig. 3B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ References · p. 28
In PGLS, omnivores were not significantly different from faunivores.
“However, in the latter analysis, omnivores were not significantly different from faunivores.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ Discussion · p. 17
Small intestine length increased with increasing absolute latitude.
“Small intestine length increased at increasing (absolute) latitude.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results · p. 8
There was no evident spacing in intestinal length between marsupials and placentals.
“There was no evident spacing in intestinal length between marsupials and placentals (Fig. S2A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results · p. 10
For the total intestine, the best model included diet and absolute latitude in GLS.
“For the total intestine, the best model included diet and absolute latitude in GLS (ΔAIC c to next-best model = 4 [temperature] and > 17 to other models).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Discussion · p. 16
In PGLS, diet did not significantly explain small intestine length.
“However, the finding that diet did not significantly explain small intestine length in PGLS indicates that within taxonomic groups, no such relationship was evident.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Discussion · p. 12
Based on the complete dataset of 519 species, the PGLS model that related total intestinal length to body mass and diet had better support than the model with body mass alone (ΔAIC = 3).
“Based on the complete dataset of 519 species, the PGLS model that related total intestinal length to body mass and diet had better support than the model with body mass alone (ΔAIC = 3, Table S3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results · p. 8
Regardless of the phylogenetic signal, the simple scaling relationships were generally similar in generalized least squares (GLS) and PGLS.
“Regardless of the phylogenetic signal, the simple scaling relationships were generally similar in generalized least squares (GLS) and PGLS (Table S2, Fig. S3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation§ Discussion · p. 14
As previously described for different datasets except for a study in rodents, intestinal lengths scale at a higher exponent than expected based on simple geometry (i.e., positive allometry at an exponent > 0.33).
“As previously described for different datasets [15-17, 23, 26] except for a study in rodents [18], intestinal lengths scale at a higher exponent than expected based on simple geometry (i.e., positive allometry at an exponent > 0.33).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 6 sources checked- cites [15] 15. Lavin S.R., Karasov W.H., Ives A.R., Middleton K.M., Garland T. 2008 Morphometrics of the avian small intestine compared with that of nonflying mammals: a phylogenetic approach. Physiol Biochem Zool 81 , 526-550. source
- cites [16] 16. McGrosky A., Codron D., Müller D.W.H., Navarrete A., Isler K., Hofmann R.R., Clauss M. 2019 Gross intestinal morphometry and allometry in ruminants. J Morphol 280 , 1254-1266.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [17] 17. McGrosky A., Meloro C., Navarrete A., Heldstab S.A., Kitchener A.C., Isler K., Clauss M. 2019 Gross intestinal morphometry and allometry in primates. Am J Primatol 81 , e23035.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [23] 23. McGrosky A., Navarrete A., Isler K., Langer P., Clauss M. 2016 Gross intestinal morphometry and allometry in Carnivora. Eur J Wildl Res 62 , 395-405. source
- cites [26] 26. Woodall P.F., Skinner J.D. 1993 Dimensions of the intestine, diet and faecal water loss in some African antelope. J Zool 229 , 457-471. source
- cites [18] 18. Lovegrove B.G. 2010 The allometry of rodent intestines. J Comp Physiol B 180 , 741-755. source
- Findingown data§ Results · p. 9
No diet effect at all was evident within Primates, Eulipotyphla, Carnivora, and Artiodactyla.
“No diet effect at all was evident within Primates, Eulipotyphla, Carnivora, and Artiodactyla (Table S5) - groups with comparatively uniform diets at the level of diet resolution of the present study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results · p. 9
When assessed individually with body mass, being volant had a negative relationship with total intestine length in both GLS and PGLS.
“When assessed individually with body mass, being volant had a negative relationship with total intestine length in both GLS and PGLS (Fig. S5A); being marine was not a significant factor; and having a forestomach had a positive relationship with total intestine length in GLS but not in PGLS (Fig. S5B; Table S6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning§ Discussion · p. 14
The scaling of the caecum differed from that of the other intestinal sections, with a lower exponent than expected (i.e., negative allometry at an exponent < 0.33).
“The scaling of the caecum differed from that of the other intestinal sections, with a lower exponent than expected (i.e., negative allometry at an exponent < 0.33).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results · p. 10
In PGLS, the best-supported model for the small intestine only included being marine.
“In PGLS, the best-supported model only included being marine (ΔAIC c to next-best model = 2; Table S7).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given§ Conclusions · p. 18
Increased habitat aridity is linked to a longer colon.
“Increased habitat aridity is linked to a longer colon,”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results · p. 10
In PGLS, the best model for the total intestine included diet and temperature.
“In PGLS, the best model included diet and temperature (ΔAIC c to next-best model = 7 [latitude] and > 18 to other models) (Table S8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Conclusions · p. 18
Habitats with colder temperature at higher latitudes are linked to longer small intestines.
“and habitats with colder temperature at higher latitudes are linked to longer small intestines.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Table S2 Summary statistics for allometric scaling as log(y) = a + b log(body mass), or y = (10 a ) BM b (significant parameters in bold ) · p. 31
In PGLS models of total intestine length across 519 mammal species, the Trophic70 herbivore category has a positive coefficient of 0.08 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.14) relative to faunivores, controlling for body mass.
“| Trophic70 | -181.9 | 8.5 | 70Herbivore | 0.24 (0.20 to 0.28) | 0.92 (0.86 to 0.95) | -482.4 | 0.0 | 0.08 (0.01 to 0.14) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results · p. 8
Phylogenetic clustering was evident both within the Laurasiatheria and the Euarchontoglires.
“Afrotheria and Xenarthra had comparatively short intestines (Fig. S2B), and phylogenetic clustering was evident both within the Laurasiatheria and the Euarchontoglires (Fig. S2C-E).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results · p. 10
For the small intestine, the models with diet and either latitude or temperature were equally supported in GLS.
“For the small intestine, the models with diet and either latitude or temperature were equally supported in GLS (ΔAIC c < 2; ΔAIC c to other models > 7).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results · p. 10
In PGLS, the model with temperature had more support than the one with latitude for the small intestine.
“In PGLS, the model with temperature had more support than the one with latitude (ΔAIC c = 3; ΔAIC c to other models > 8) (Table S9).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Discussion · p. 17
In the present study, marine mammals had longer small intestines.
“Similar to previous reports, marine mammals were indicated to have longer small intestines in the present study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Table S2 Summary statistics for allometric scaling as log(y) = a + b log(body mass), or y = (10 a ) BM b (significant parameters in bold ) · p. 31
In GLS models of total intestine length across 519 mammal species, %faunivory has a negative coefficient of -0.28 (95% CI -0.32 to -0.23), controlling for body mass.
“| %faunivory | -190.5 | 0.0 | c | -0.28 (-0.32 to -0.23) | 0.92 (0.87 to 0.95) | -482.2 | 0.2 | -0.09 (-0.16 to -0.01) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results · p. 8
Afrotheria and Xenarthra had comparatively short intestines.
“Afrotheria and Xenarthra had comparatively short intestines (Fig. S2B), and phylogenetic clustering was evident both within the Laurasiatheria and the Euarchontoglires (Fig. S2C-E).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Results · p. 9
The large intestine showed a clear diet relationship in Eutheria, Boroeutheria, Euarchontoglires and Laurasiatheria.
“By contrast, the large intestine showed a clear diet relationship in all these groups (Table S5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results · p. 9
The effect of trophic level was not consistent across different taxonomic groups.
“The effect of trophic level was not consistent across different taxonomic groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Conclusions · p. 17
The investigation demonstrates associations between intestinal anatomy and dietary niches.
“Our investigation demonstrates associations between intestinal anatomy and dietary niches that have been claimed in the biological literature for long.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Discussion · p. 16
In GLS, animals with a forestomach had longer small intestines.
“The GLS finding that animals with a forestomach had longer small intestines was surprising.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Table S2 Summary statistics for allometric scaling as log(y) = a + b log(body mass), or y = (10 a ) BM b (significant parameters in bold ) · p. 31
In GLS models of total intestine length across 519 mammal species, %less digestible plants has a positive coefficient of 0.29 (95% CI 0.24 to 0.34), controlling for body mass.
“| %less digestible plants | -167.1 | 23.4 | c | 0.29 (0.24 to 0.34) | 0.92 (0.87 to 0.95) | -478.6 | 3.8 | 0.04 (-0.03 to 0.11) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Results · p. 9
For the total intestine, the large groups of Eutheria, Boroeutheria, Euarchontoglires and Laurasiatheria showed significant effects of diet in GLS but not PGLS.
“For the total intestine, the large groups of Eutheria, Boroeutheria, Euarchontoglires and Laurasiatheria showed significant effects of diet in GLS but not PGLS, indicating that taxa within these groups differ systematically by total intestine length and diet.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation§ References · p. 28
In the Chivers and Hladik dataset, dietary classifications are not consistent across the analyses.
“dietary classifications are not consistent across the analyses, e.g. the group of colobine monkeys is classified as both frugi- and folivorous in one display (Fig. 18) and as only folivorous in another (Fig. 20);”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data§ Table S2 Summary statistics for allometric scaling as log(y) = a + b log(body mass), or y = (10 a ) BM b (significant parameters in bold ) · p. 31
In PGLS models of total intestine length across 519 mammal species, %faunivory has a negative coefficient of -0.09 (95% CI -0.16 to -0.01), controlling for body mass.
“| %faunivory | -190.5 | 0.0 | c | -0.28 (-0.32 to -0.23) | 0.92 (0.87 to 0.95) | -482.2 | 0.2 | -0.09 (-0.16 to -0.01) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 724 725 726 · p. 35
In Boroeutheria, the diet proxy (%faunivory) has a significant negative association with total intestinal length in GLS models (c = -0.28, 95% CI -0.32 to -0.23).
“| Boroeutheria | Total intest. | BM + %faunivory | 453 | -206.2 | 0.0 | | -0.28 (-0.32 to -0.23) | 0.82 (0.73 to 0.89) | -516.0 | 0.0 | -0.07 (-0.14 to 0.01) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 724 725 726 · p. 37
In Artiodactyla, the diet proxy (%faunivory) is not significantly associated with total intestinal length in GLS models (c = -0.32, 95% CI -0.86 to 0.23).
“| Artiodactyla | Total intest. | BM + %faunivory | 81 | -79.0 | 1.4 | c | -0.32 (-0.86 to 0.23) | 0.38 (NA to NA) | -94.0 | 2.0 | -0.03 (-0.73 to 0.67) |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Table S2 Summary statistics for allometric scaling as log(y) = a + b log(body mass), or y = (10 a ) BM b (significant parameters in bold ) · p. 32
In PGLS models of small intestine length across 397 mammal species, %faunivory has a coefficient of 0.03 (95% CI -0.07 to 0.13), controlling for body mass.
“| Small intest. Small intest. Large intest. | BM BM + %faunivory BM | 397 | -96.0 | 18.9 | - | a b c -0.13 b | 2.13 (2.11 to 2.15) 0.46 (0.44 to 0.47) (-0.19 to -0.08) | 0.93 (0.87 to 0.96) | -339.9 | 0.0 | - | 2.04 (1.69 to 2.39) 0.40 (0.38 to 0.43) 0.03 (-0.07 to 0.13) |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 760 761 · p. 52
Euarchontoglires have a shallower scaling of caecum length with body mass than Laurasiatheria.
“Euarchontoglires have longer caeca, and a shallower scaling”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 724 725 726 · p. 34
For total intestine length, a body-mass-only model has a substantially higher AICc than the model that additionally includes %faunivory (ΔAIC = 92.2).
“| Total intest. | BM | 351 | -82.5 | 92.2 | 92.2 | a | 2.31 (2.29 to 2.33) | 0.94 (0.90 to 0.97) | -391.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.19 (1.88 to 2.51) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 760 761 · p. 47
In mammals, the caecum becomes relatively shorter at increasing body mass.
“the caecum becomes relatively shorter at increasing body mass”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 760 761 · p. 46
For mammalian caecum length (n = 316 species), the GLS model including body mass, %faunivory and latitude has the lowest AICc (ΔAICc = 0.0) among the tested GLS models.
“BM + %faunivory + Lat | 25.8 | 0.0 | c a b c d | -0.63 (-0.71 to -0.54) 1.05 (0.99 to 1.11) 0.20 (0.18 to 0.22) -0.60 (-0.69 to -0.52) 0.0033 (0.0015 to 0.0052)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 724 725 726 · p. 36
In primates, the diet proxy (%faunivory) is not significantly associated with total intestinal length in GLS models (c = -0.03, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.13).
“| Primates | Total intest. | BM + %faunivory | 62 | -70.6 | 5.0 | c | -0.03 (-0.20 to 0.13) | 0.93 (0.72 to 0.99) | -109.2 | 1.8 | -0.04 (-0.23 to 0.14) |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 741 742 · p. 39
In the same GLS model of total intestinal length, the coefficient for being marine is 0.21 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.31).
“| BM + %faunivory + Vol + Mar + FStom | -251.8 | 0.0 | e | 0.21 (0.11 to 0.31) | 0.90 (0.84 to 0.94) | -483.2 | 2.0 | 0.10 (-0.02 to 0.23) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 724 725 726 · p. 34
In a model of total intestine length including body mass and %faunivory, the body mass exponent is 0.43 (95% CI 0.42 to 0.45).
“| Total intest. | BM + %faunivory | 351 | -174.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | b | 0.43 (0.42 to 0.45) | 0.93 (0.89 to 0.97) | -391.3 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.38 (0.36 to 0.41) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 760 761 · p. 52
Euarchontoglires have longer caeca than Laurasiatheria.
“Euarchontoglires have longer caeca, and a shallower scaling”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 724 725 726 · p. 36
In primates, the diet proxy (%faunivory) is not significantly associated with large intestinal length in GLS models (c = -0.23, 95% CI -0.50 to 0.04).
“| Primates | Large intest. | BM + %faunivory | 62 | -13.9 | 1.4 | c | -0.23 (-0.50 to 0.04) | 0.93 (0.72 to 0.99) | -59.9 | 1.3 | -0.14 (-0.33 to 0.06) |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 724 725 726 · p. 37
In Eulipotyphla, the diet proxy (%faunivory) is not significantly associated with total intestinal length in GLS models (c = 0.36, 95% CI -0.75 to 1.46).
“| Eulipotyphla | Total intest. | BM + %faunivory | 18 | 8.5 | 0.9 | c 0.36 | (-0.75 to 1.46) | 0.75 (0.15 to NA) | -6.5 | 0.8 | 0.48 (-0.40 to 1.36) |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 724 725 726 · p. 36
In Euarchontoglires, the diet proxy (%faunivory) has a significant negative association with total intestinal length in GLS models (c = -0.15, 95% CI -0.25 to -0.05).
“| Euarchontoglires | Total intest. | BM + %faunivory | 210 | -165.6 | 0.0 | c | -0.15 (-0.25 to -0.05) | 0.80 (0.63 to 0.90) | -284.1 | 0.9 | -0.05 (-0.16 to 0.05) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 760 761 · p. 52
In PGLS analysis, the confidence intervals for caecum length scaling overlap between Euarchontoglires and Laurasiatheria.
“but confidence intervals overlap in PGLS”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 741 742 · p. 39
In the same GLS model of total intestinal length, the coefficient for being volant is -0.16 (95% CI -0.21 to -0.10).
“| BM + %faunivory + Vol + Mar + FStom | -251.8 | 0.0 | d | -0.16 (-0.21 to -0.10) | 0.90 (0.84 to 0.94) | -483.2 | 2.0 | -0.29 (-0.56 to -0.02) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 746 747 · p. 41
In the same GLS model of small intestinal length, the coefficient for having a forestomach is 0.07 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.11).
“| BM + %faunivory + Mar + FStom | -145.6 | 0.0 | e | 0.07 (0.03 to 0.11) | 0.93 (0.88 to 0.96) | -339.3 | 3.6 | 0.04 (-0.07 to 0.15) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 724 725 726 · p. 36
In rodents, the diet proxy (%faunivory) has a significant negative association with large intestinal length in GLS models (c = -0.48, 95% CI -0.64 to -0.33).
“| Rodents | Large intest. | BM + %faunivory | 135 | -62.4 | 0.0 | c | -0.48 (-0.64 to -0.33) | 0.56 (0.26 to 0.81) | -99.9 | 0.0 | -0.40 (-0.56 to -0.23) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 760 761 · p. 52
In PGLS analysis, geometric scaling was included in the confidence interval for both coprophageous and non-coprophageous groups.
“using PGLS, geometric scaling was included in the confidence interval for both groups”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 760 761 · p. 52
In PGLS analysis, the caecum length of non-coprophageous mammals scales as 4.5 (95% CI 1.3 to 15.5) times body mass to the power 0.29 (95% CI 0.24 to 0.33).
“non-coprophageous: caecum length = 4.5 [1.3 to 15.5] BM 0.29 [0.24 to 0.33]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 724 725 726 · p. 34
In a model of large intestine length including body mass and %faunivory, the body mass exponent is 0.39 (95% CI 0.37 to 0.41).
“| Large intest. | BM + %faunivory | 351 | -88.1 | 0.0 | 86.6 | b | 0.39 (0.37 to 0.41) | 0.95 (0.90 to 0.97) | -241.3 | 0.0 | 150.0 | 0.36 (0.32 to 0.39) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 724 725 726 · p. 36
In Euarchontoglires, the diet proxy (%faunivory) has a significant negative association with large intestinal length in GLS models (c = -0.47, 95% CI -0.60 to -0.34).
“| Euarchontoglires | Large intest. | BM + %faunivory | 204 | -63.9 | 0.0 | c | -0.47 (-0.60 to -0.34) | 0.82 (0.62 to 0.93) | -155.5 | 0.0 | -0.30 (-0.45 to -0.16) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 724 725 726 · p. 35
In marsupials, the diet proxy (%faunivory) has a significant negative association with total intestinal length in GLS models (c = -0.50, 95% CI -0.76 to -0.23).
“| Marsupials | | | | | | c | -0.50 (-0.76 to -0.23) | 0.46 (NA to 0.97) | 9.1 | 0.0 | -0.46 (-0.78 to -0.15) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 760 761 · p. 52
In GLS analysis, the caecum length of coprophageous mammals scales as 10.0 (95% CI 9.1 to 10.9) times body mass to the power 0.20 (95% CI 0.17 to 0.23).
“coprophageous: caecum length = 10.0 [9.1 to 10.9] BM 0.20 [0.17 to 0.23]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 760 761 · p. 52
In PGLS analysis, the caecum length of Laurasiatheria scales as 5.6 (95% CI 2.8 to 11.1) times body mass to the power 0.30 (95% CI 0.24 to 0.36).
“PGLS: Lauras. caecum length = 5.6 [2.8 to 11.1] BM 0.30 [0.24 to 0.36]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 760 761 · p. 52
Among non-coprophageous mammals, the koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) is the species with the very long caecum.
“The species with the very long caecum among the non-coprophageous mammals, is the koala ( Phascolarctos cinereus)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 724 725 726 · p. 37
In Chiroptera, the diet proxy (%faunivory) has a significant negative association with total intestinal length in GLS models (c = -0.28, 95% CI -0.37 to -0.18).
“| Chiroptera | Total intest. | BM + %faunivory | 73 | -43.4 | 0.0 | c | -0.28 (-0.37 to -0.18) | 0.86 (0.57 to 0.99) | -84.5 | 0.0 | -0.23 (-0.39 to -0.07) |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 760 761 · p. 47
In mammals, the relationship between the small and the large intestine stays similar across body mass.
“while the relationship between the small and the large intestine stays similar”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 760 761 · p. 52
In GLS analysis, the caecum length of non-coprophageous mammals scales as 6.4 (95% CI 5.6 to 7.3) times body mass to the power 0.29 (95% CI 0.25 to 0.33).
“non-coprophageous: caecum length = 6.4 [5.6 to 7.3] BM 0.29 [0.25 to 0.33]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 746 747 · p. 41
In the same GLS model of small intestinal length, the coefficient for being marine is 0.30 (95% CI 0.18 to 0.42).
“| BM + %faunivory + Mar + FStom | -145.6 | 0.0 | d | 0.30 (0.18 to 0.42) | 0.93 (0.88 to 0.96) | -339.3 | 3.6 | 0.19 (0.01 to 0.37) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 760 761 · p. 52
In PGLS analysis, there were no differences in the scaling exponent between coprophageous and non-coprophageous mammal groups.
“there were no differences in the scaling exponent”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 724 725 726 · p. 34
In a model of small intestine length including body mass and %faunivory, the body mass exponent is 0.45 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.47).
“| Small intest. | BM + %faunivory | 351 | -112.9 | 0.0 | 61.8 | b | 0.45 (0.43 to 0.47) | 0.96 (0.92 to 0.98) | -345.8 | 1.8 | 45.5 | 0.40 (0.37 to 0.43) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 760 761 · p. 52
In GLS analysis, geometric scaling was included in the confidence interval for non-coprophageous species.
“geometric scaling was included in the confidence interval for non-coprophageous species”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 741 742 · p. 39
In the same GLS model of total intestinal length, the coefficient for having a forestomach is 0.06 (95% CI 0.03 to 0.10).
“| BM + %faunivory + Vol + Mar + FStom | -251.8 | 0.0 | f | 0.06 (0.03 to 0.10) | 0.90 (0.84 to 0.94) | -483.2 | 2.0 | 0.01 (-0.08 to 0.11) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 724 725 726 · p. 37
In Carnivora, the diet proxy (%faunivory) is not significantly associated with total intestinal length in GLS models (c = 0.00, 95% CI -0.18 to 0.17).
“| Carnivora | Total intest. | BM + %faunivory | 60 | -4.1 | 5.0 | c | 0.00 (-0.18 to 0.17) | 0.69 (0.41 to 0.90) | -67.0 | 1.3 | 0.07 (-0.10 to 0.24) |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 724 725 726 · p. 37
In Laurasiatheria, the diet proxy (%faunivory) has a significant negative association with large intestinal length in GLS models (c = -0.82, 95% CI -0.90 to -0.73).
“| Laurasiatheria | Large intest. | BM + %faunivory | 133 | -21.7 | 0.0 | c | -0.82 (-0.90 to -0.73) | 0.92 (0.79 to 0.98) | -106.0 | 0.0 | -0.27 (-0.49 to -0.05) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Table S2 Summary statistics for allometric scaling as log(y) = a + b log(body mass), or y = (10 a ) BM b (significant parameters in bold ) · p. 32
In GLS models of small intestine length across 397 mammal species, %faunivory has a negative coefficient of -0.13 (95% CI -0.19 to -0.08), controlling for body mass.
“| Small intest. Small intest. Large intest. | BM BM + %faunivory BM | 397 | -96.0 | 18.9 | - | a b c -0.13 b | 2.13 (2.11 to 2.15) 0.46 (0.44 to 0.47) (-0.19 to -0.08) | 0.93 (0.87 to 0.96) | -339.9 | 0.0 | - | 2.04 (1.69 to 2.39) 0.40 (0.38 to 0.43) 0.03 (-0.07 to 0.13) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 760 761 · p. 52
In GLS analysis, the caecum length of Euarchontoglires scales as 10.7 (95% CI 9.7 to 11.9) times body mass to the power 0.20 (95% CI 0.16 to 0.25).
“Euarch. caecum length = 10.7 [9.7 to 11.9] BM 0.20 [0.16 to 0.25]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 760 761 · p. 52
In GLS analysis, the scaling of caecum length with body mass between coprophageous and non-coprophageous mammal groups had different confidence intervals for both the factor and the exponent.
“Using GLS, the scaling between the two functional mammal groups had different confidence intervals for both the factor and the exponent”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 760 761 · p. 52
In GLS analysis, the caecum length of Laurasiatheria scales as 4.1 (95% CI 3.0 to 5.7) times body mass to the power 0.40 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.49).
“Lauras. caecum length = 4.1 [3.0 to 5.7] BM 0.40 [0.32 to 0.49]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 724 725 726 · p. 34
In a model of caecum length including body mass and %faunivory, the body mass exponent is 0.19 (95% CI 0.17 to 0.22).
“| Caecum | BM + %faunivory | 351 | 55.2 | 0.0 | 229.9 | b | 0.19 (0.17 to 0.22) | 0.95 (0.92 to 0.97) | -185.8 | 0.0 | 205.5 | 0.27 (0.24 to 0.31) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 724 725 726 · p. 34
In a model of small intestine length including body mass and %faunivory, the %faunivory coefficient is -0.18 (95% CI -0.24 to -0.11).
“| Small intest. | BM + %faunivory | 351 | -112.9 | 0.0 | 61.8 | c | -0.18 (-0.24 to -0.11) | 0.96 (0.92 to 0.98) | -345.8 | 1.8 | 45.5 | 0.03 (-0.08 to 0.15) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 724 725 726 · p. 35
In Afrotheria, the diet proxy (%faunivory) has a significant negative association with total intestinal length in GLS models (c = -0.43, 95% CI -0.69 to -0.16).
“| Afrotheria | Total intest. | BM + %faunivory | 23 | 2.1 | 0.0 | c | -0.43 (-0.69 to -0.16) | 0.72 (0.13 to 0.96) | -19.2 | 0.0 | -0.40 (-0.77 to -0.04) |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 724 725 726 · p. 37
In Carnivora, the diet proxy (%faunivory) is not significantly associated with large intestinal length in GLS models (c = 0.01, 95% CI -0.22 to 0.23).
“| Carnivora | Large intest. | BM | 40 | -30.1 | 4.5 | c | 0.35 (0.30 to 0.40) 0.01 (-0.22 to 0.23) | 0.69 (0.41 to 0.90) | -48.8 | 1.8 | 0.35 (0.29 to 0.41) 0.05 (-0.17 to 0.27) |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 724 725 726 · p. 35
In Afrotheria, the diet proxy (%faunivory) has a significant negative association with large intestinal length in GLS models (c = -0.61, 95% CI -0.88 to -0.33).
“| Afrotheria | Large intest. | BM + %faunivory | 12 | 5.2 | 0.0 | c | -0.61 (-0.88 to -0.33) | 0.93 (NA to NA) | -12.2 | 0.0 | -0.68 (-1.24 to -0.11) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 724 725 726 · p. 34
In a model of total intestine length including body mass and %faunivory, the %faunivory coefficient is -0.31 (95% CI -0.37 to -0.25).
“| Total intest. | BM + %faunivory | 351 | -174.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | c | -0.31 (-0.37 to -0.25) | 0.93 (0.89 to 0.97) | -391.3 | 0.4 | 0.0 | -0.07 (-0.17 to 0.04) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Table S2 Summary statistics for allometric scaling as log(y) = a + b log(body mass), or y = (10 a ) BM b (significant parameters in bold ) · p. 31
Among GLS models of total intestine length with different diet proxies, the %faunivory model has the lowest AICc (ΔAIC = 0.0).
“| %faunivory | -190.5 | 0.0 | a | 2.37 (2.34 to 2.39) | 0.92 (0.87 to 0.95) | -482.2 | 0.2 | 2.23 (1.92 to 2.54) 0.40 (0.38 to 0.42) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 724 725 726 · p. 34
In a model of large intestine length including body mass and %faunivory, the %faunivory coefficient is -0.68 (95% CI -0.75 to -0.62).
“| Large intest. | BM + %faunivory | 351 | -88.1 | 0.0 | 86.6 | c | -0.68 (-0.75 to -0.62) | 0.95 (0.90 to 0.97) | -241.3 | 0.0 | 150.0 | -0.33 (-0.46 to -0.19) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 724 725 726 · p. 36
In rodents, the diet proxy (%faunivory) is not significantly associated with total intestinal length in GLS models (c = -0.12, 95% CI -0.25 to 0.01).
“| Rodents | Total intest. | BM | 140 | -105.6 | 2.3 | c | -0.12 (-0.25 to 0.01) | 0.66 (0.42 to 0.84) | -164.2 | 1.4 | -0.05 (-0.19 to 0.08) |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 760 761 · p. 52
In PGLS analysis, the caecum length of coprophageous mammals scales as 7.8 (95% CI 2.5 to 24.1) times body mass to the power 0.29 (95% CI 0.25 to 0.33).
“coprophageous: caecum length = 7.8 [2.5 to 24.1] BM 0.29 [0.25 to 0.33]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ 724 725 726 · p. 37
In Laurasiatheria, the diet proxy (%faunivory) has a significant negative association with total intestinal length in GLS models (c = -0.27, 95% CI -0.33 to -0.21).
“| Laurasiatheria | Total intest. | BM + %faunivory | n 243 | -66.3 | 0.0 | c | -0.27 (-0.33 to -0.21) | 0.85 (0.73 to 0.92) | -246.8 | 0.3 | -0.07 (-0.18 to 0.04) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 760 761 · p. 46
For mammalian caecum length, the PGLS model including body mass, %faunivory and actual evapotranspiration has the lowest AICc (ΔAICc = 0.0) among the tested PGLS models.
“BM + %faunivory + AET | 36.2 | 2.2 | c d | 1.2 (1.16 to 1.29) 0.19 (0.17 to 0.22) -0.61 (-0.70 to -0.53) (-0.0087 to -0.0021) 1.17 (1.11 to 1.24) | | | 0.0 | 0.91 (0.48 to 1.34) 0.28 (0.24 to 0.32) -0.30 (-0.45 to -0.15) -0.0008 (-0.0037 to 0.0021) 0.85 (0.43 to 0.28 (0.24 to -0.30 (-0.45 to”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 760 761 · p. 52
In PGLS analysis, the numerical difference in the factor between coprophageous and non-coprophageous groups was not maintained by the confidence intervals.
“the numerical difference in the factor was not maintained by the confidence intervals”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 724 725 726 · p. 35
In marsupials, the diet proxy (%faunivory) has a significant negative association with large intestinal length in GLS models (c = -0.79, 95% CI -1.13 to -0.45).
“| Marsupials | Large intest. | BM + %faunivory | 33 | 36.1 | 0.0 | c | -0.79 (-1.13 to -0.45) | 0.95 (0.70 to 0.99) | 13.8 | 0.0 | -0.63 (-1.17 to -0.09) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 760 761 · p. 52
In PGLS analysis, the caecum length of Euarchontoglires scales as 11.6 (95% CI 7.7 to 17.6) times body mass to the power 0.29 (95% CI 0.24 to 0.35).
“Euarch. caecum length = 11.6 [7.7 to 17.6] BM 0.29 [0.24 to 0.35]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 746 747 · p. 41
In the best GLS model of small intestinal length including body mass, %faunivory, marine, and forestomach, the coefficient for %faunivory is -0.16 (95% CI -0.22 to -0.09).
“| BM + %faunivory + Mar + FStom | -145.6 | 0.0 | c | -0.16 (-0.22 to -0.09) | 0.93 (0.88 to 0.96) | -339.3 | 3.6 | 0.01 (-0.10 to 0.11) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 741 742 · p. 39
In a GLS model of total intestinal length across 519 mammal species including body mass, %faunivory, volant, marine, and forestomach, the coefficient for %faunivory is -0.26 (95% CI -0.30 to -0.21).
“| BM + %faunivory + Vol + Mar + FStom | -251.8 | 0.0 | c | -0.26 (-0.30 to -0.21) | 0.90 (0.84 to 0.94) | -483.2 | 2.0 | -0.10 (-0.18 to -0.02) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Abstract · p. 2
The longer small intestine in species from colder habitats at higher latitudes possibly facilitates the processing of peak intake rates during the growing season.
“The small intestine was longer in species from colder habitats at higher latitudes, possibly facilitating the processing of peak intake rates during the growing season.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Abstract · p. 2
The dependence of significant results on large sample sizes and inclusion of specific taxonomic groups indicates that the relationships cannot be considered fixed biological laws.
“This study corroborates intuitive expectations on digestive tract anatomy, while the dependence of significant results on large sample sizes and inclusion of specific taxonomic groups indicates that the relationships cannot be considered fixed biological laws.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Abstract · p. 2
Diet has a main effect on the components of the large intestine, with longer measures in herbivores.
“Thus, diet has a main effect on the components of the large intestine, with longer measures in herbivores.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Background · p. 4
Large-scale studies that accounted for phylogeny did not confirm an association between diet and GIT complexity.
“By contrast, large-scale studies that accounted for phylogeny did not confirm an association between diet and intestinal length [15-19] or GIT complexity [20].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] 20. Langer P., Clauss M. 2018 Morphological adaptation of the eutherian gastrointestinal tract to diet. Vertebr Zool 68 , 237-252.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data§ Discussion · p. 13
Both phylogenetic signals, K and λ, indicated that closely related species share a common intestinal morphology.
“Both phylogenetic signals, K and λ, indicated that closely related species share a common intestinal morphology.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusions · p. 18
Different sections of the intestinal tract fulfil different functions during digestion.
“Our findings emphasize that different sections of the intestinal tract fulfil different functions during digestion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Discussion · p. 16
Within taxonomic groups, no relationship between diet and small intestine length was evident.
“However, the finding that diet did not significantly explain small intestine length in PGLS indicates that within taxonomic groups, no such relationship was evident.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Conclusions · p. 17
The associations between intestinal anatomy and dietary niches cannot be considered ubiquitous or fixed laws.
“At the same time, they indicate that these associations - or convergences - cannot be considered ubiquitous or 'fixed laws'.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Discussion · p. 17
A long small intestine may be an adaptive feature for life at high latitudes.
“our findings might indicate that a long small intestine itself is an adaptive feature for life at high latitudes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Discussion · p. 16
Animals in more xeric environments need more intestinal capacity for water reabsorption.
“The findings that both precipitation and actual evapotranspiration were negatively related with colon/rectum and hence large intestine length support the concept that animals in more xeric environments need more intestinal capacity for water reabsorption [16, 26, 27]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [16] 16. McGrosky A., Codron D., Müller D.W.H., Navarrete A., Isler K., Hofmann R.R., Clauss M. 2019 Gross intestinal morphometry and allometry in ruminants. J Morphol 280 , 1254-1266.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [26] 26. Woodall P.F., Skinner J.D. 1993 Dimensions of the intestine, diet and faecal water loss in some African antelope. J Zool 229 , 457-471. source
- cites [27] 27. Cain J.W., Krausman P.R., Rosenstock S.S., Turner J.C. 2006 Mechanisms of thermoregulation and water balance in desert ungulates. Wildl Soc Bull 34 , 570-581. source
- Interpretationreasoning§ Discussion · p. 16
The shorter total intestines in volant mammals are most likely to reduce overall weight.
“most likely to reduce the overall weight.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Discussion · p. 16
Flying mammals acquired morpho-physiological adaptations such as an enlarged intestinal absorptive area by increased microvillous amplification and epithelial folding.
“Therefore, flying mammals acquired morpho-physiological adaptations such as an enlarged intestinal absorptive area by increased microvillous amplification and epithelial folding [74].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [74]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Discussion · p. 17
Increased intestinal capacity may facilitate intense resource processing during periods of resource limitation in seasonal environments.
“Given that seasonal environments have been linked to an increase in the pace of life [76], increased intestinal capacity might thus facilitate intense resource processing during periods of resource limitation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [76]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Discussion · p. 13
Phylogenetic specialization on either easily digestible or less easily-digestible plant parts explains why several diet descriptors were not significantly related to total intestine length in PGLS.
“Whereas in GLS, all diet descriptors were significantly related to total intestine length, this was not the case for several of them in PGLS (Table S2), suggesting phylogenetic specialization on either easily digestible or less easily-digestible plant parts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Discussion · p. 14
Based on these scaling relationships, larger mammals have, on average, a relatively shorter caecum.
“Based on these scaling relationships, larger mammals have, on average, a relatively shorter caecum.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ Discussion · p. 17
The additional small intestine capacity in marine mammals is required to compensate for a lack of intestinal function during diving.
“This additional capacity is required to compensate for a lack of intestinal function during diving [23-25].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [23] 23. McGrosky A., Navarrete A., Isler K., Langer P., Clauss M. 2016 Gross intestinal morphometry and allometry in Carnivora. Eur J Wildl Res 62 , 395-405. source
- cites [24] 24. Mårtensson P.E., Nordoy E.S., Messelt E.B., Blix A.S. 1998 Gut length, food transit time and diving habit in phocid seals. Polar Biology 20 , 213-217. 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 source
- cites [25] 25. Krockenberger M.B., Bryden M.M. 1994 Rate of passage of digesta through the alimentary tract of southern elephant seals ( Mirounga leonina ). J Zool 234 , 229-237. source
- Interpretationown data§ Discussion · p. 11
It is reasonable to consider different sections of the intestinal tract individually, as they are linked to the different biological factors to varying degrees.
“Throughout, the results emphasize that it is reasonable to consider different sections of the intestinal tract individually, as they are linked to the different biological factors to varying degrees.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ Discussion · p. 15
Major differences between the trophic guilds need not be expected for the small intestine.
“and therefore, major differences between the trophic guilds need not to be expected for the small intestine.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The digestive action in the small intestine is not related to fibre fermentation but to auto-enzymatic digestion of proteins, fats, and easily digested carbohydrates.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Discussion · p. 14
The 'shallower' scaling of the caecum is an effect of particularly long caeca in small species of the Lagomorpha and Rodentia.
“Rather, we suggest that the 'shallower' scaling is an effect of particularly long caeca in small species of the Lagomorpha and Rodentia (Fig. S6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Discussion · p. 16
Active flight is an energetically demanding form of locomotion requiring sufficient energy absorption from the shorter intestines.
“Yet, active flight is an energetically demanding form of locomotion [73] for which sufficient energy must be absorbed from the shorter intestines.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [73]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data§ Conclusions · p. 17
Data scatter suggests that different morphophysiological solutions exist for the same ecological challenge.
“Rather, data scatter suggests that different morphophysiological solutions exist for the same ecological challenge - a typical finding of ecomorphological studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Discussion · p. 17
In seasonal environments, the digestive tract must cope with seasonally high intakes rather than constant food intake.
“Rather than experiencing a constant food intake, their digestive tract thus has to be able to cope with seasonally high intakes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Discussion · p. 12
Depending on the sample composition, the diet hypothesis would be confirmed or rejected.
“Hence, depending on the sample composition, the diet hypothesis would be confirmed or rejected.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Results · p. 8
The large intestine is more subjected to additional influence factors than the small intestine.
“When using only species for which all respective data were available, the small intestine-body mass relationship achieved lower AIC c than the large intestine-body mass relationsip (ΔAIC c GLS=357, PGLS =135), or than the caecum-body mass and colon/rectum-body mass relationships (ΔAIC c GLS>308, PGLS>178), suggesting that the large intestine is more subjected to additional influence factors (Table”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 23
- May combine two claims. 36
- The quote only partly states this claim. 10
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Background · p. 4Special adaptations to a volant lifestyle are thought to influence GIT anatomy.
“Other factors than diet thought to influence GIT anatomy include special adaptations to a volant [15, 21, 22] or a marine [23-25] lifestyle, or the aridity of the habitat [16, 26, 27].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [15] 15. Lavin S.R., Karasov W.H., Ives A.R., Middleton K.M., Garland T. 2008 Morphometrics of the avian small intestine compared with that of nonflying mammals: a phylogenetic approach. Physiol Biochem Zool 81 , 526-550. source
- cites [21] 21. Price E.R., Brun A., Caviedes-Vidal E., Karasov W.H. 2015 Digestive adaptations of aerial lifestyles. Physiology 30 , 69-78. source
- cites [22] 22. Caviedes-Vidal E., McWhorter T.J., Lavin S.R., Chediack J.G., Tracy C.R., Karasov W.H. 2007 The digestive adaptation of flying vertebrates: high intestinal paracellular absorption compensates for smaller guts. PNAS 104 , 19132-19137. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Background · p. 3Ecomorphological diversity is considered the main driver of species diversity, and diet is considered as one of the most important components of an animal's niche.
“Ecomorphological diversity is considered the main driver of species diversity, and diet is considered as one of the most important components of an animal's niche [1].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] 1. Sahney S., Benton M.J., Ferry P.A. 2010 Links between global taxonomic diversity, ecological diversity and the expansion of vertebrates on land. Biol Lett 6 , 544-547. source
The Results and Discussion link ecological diversity closely with tetrapod family diversity, and Methods includes diet among the variables defining ecological modes. But the Discussion identifies expansion into available ecospace—not ecomorphological diversity itself—as the main driver of tetrapod diversification. The paper does not rank diet as one of the most important components of an animal’s niche. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Premisecitation§ Methods · p. 7Comparative analyses need to consider the phylogenetic structure of the datasets that are analyzed.
“Comparative analyses need to consider the phylogenetic structure of the datasets that are analyzed [41-43].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [41] 41. Garland T., Bennett A.F., Rezende E.L. 2005 Phylogenetic approaches in comparative physiology. J Exp Biol 208 , 3015-3035. source
- cites [42] 42. Rezende R.P., Diniz-Filho J. 2012 Phylogenetic analyses: comparing species to infer adaptations and physiological mechanisms. Comprehensive Physiology 2 , 645-674. source
- cites [43] 43. Clauss M., Dittmann M.T., Müller D.W.H., Zerbe P., Codron D. 2014 Low scaling of a life history variable: analysing eutherian gestation periods with and without phylogeny-informed statistics. Mamm Biol 79 , 9-16. source
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Results · p. 8In all PGLS analyses, there was a strong phylogenetic signal (λ > 0.9), indicating significant phylogenetic structure in all datasets.
“In all PGLS analyses, there was a strong phylogenetic signal (λ > 0.9), indicating significant phylogenetic structure in all datasets (Tables S2-S12).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Results · p. 7Generally, the small intestine represented the longest intestinal section, followed by the colon/rectum, and the caecum.
“Generally, the small intestine represented the longest intestinal section, followed by the colon/rectum, and the caecum (Fig. S1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data§ Table S2 Summary statistics for allometric scaling as log(y) = a + b log(body mass), or y = (10 a ) BM b (significant parameters in bold ) · p. 31In GLS models of total intestine length across 519 mammal species, the Trophic90 herbivore category has a positive coefficient of 0.27 (95% CI 0.23 to 0.32) relative to faunivores, controlling for body mass.
“| Trophic90 | -182.3 | 8.1 | 90Herbivore | 0.27 (0.23 to 0.32) | 0.92 (0.87 to 0.95) | -479.1 | 3.3 | 0.07 (0.00 to 0.14) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data§ Table S2 Summary statistics for allometric scaling as log(y) = a + b log(body mass), or y = (10 a ) BM b (significant parameters in bold ) · p. 31In GLS models of total intestine length across 519 mammal species, the Trophic70 herbivore category has a positive coefficient of 0.24 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.28) relative to faunivores, controlling for body mass.
“| Trophic70 | -181.9 | 8.5 | 70Herbivore | 0.24 (0.20 to 0.28) | 0.92 (0.86 to 0.95) | -482.4 | 0.0 | 0.08 (0.01 to 0.14) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Results · p. 9Having a forestomach had a positive relationship with total intestine length in GLS but not in PGLS.
“When assessed individually with body mass, being volant had a negative relationship with total intestine length in both GLS and PGLS (Fig. S5A); being marine was not a significant factor; and having a forestomach had a positive relationship with total intestine length in GLS but not in PGLS (Fig. S5B; Table S6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Results · p. 9In GLS, a model that included diet and all three factors (volant, marine, forestomach) was the best-supported, with all factors being significant (here, being marine had a positive effect on length).
“In GLS, a model that included diet and all three factors (volant, marine, forestomach) was the bestsupported (ΔAIC c to the next-best model = 9), with all factors being significant (here, being marine had a positive effect on length).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Discussion · p. 12In the reduced datasets of 387 or 351 species, both models (body mass alone vs body mass and diet) were equally supported (ΔAIC=1.9 and 0, respectively).
“However, in the reduced datasets of 387 or 351 species, both models were equally supported (ΔAIC=1.9 and 0, respectively, Table S3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Conclusions · p. 18Trophic differentiation of the small intestine follows mammalian phylogeny and yields no significant signal when accounting for phylogeny.
“whereas a trophic differentiation of the small intestine follows mammalian phylogeny, and yields no significant signal when accounting for phylogeny.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Results · p. 10In PGLS, the best models included diet and either AET or temperature for the large intestine, but only diet and AET for the colon/rectum.
“In PGLS, the best models included diet and either AET or temperature for the large intestine (ΔAIC c < 2; ΔAIC c to precipitation = 2, to other models > 4), but only diet and AET for the colon/rectum (ΔAIC c to other models > 2) (Tables S10 and S11).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingcitation§ References · p. 28In the Chivers and Hladik dataset, the overlap between diet groups is substantial.
“In that dataset, the overlap between diet groups is substantial - a fact typically not mentioned when it is cited.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Discussion · p. 12A comparatively large dataset (351 species) did not indicate an effect of trophic level on total intestinal length, whereas a yet distinctively larger dataset (519 species) did.
“Thus, a comparatively large dataset (351 species) did not indicate an effect of trophic level on total intestinal length, whereas a yet distinctively larger dataset (519 species) did.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Results · p. 9Clear diet effects for the total and large intestine were evident in the samples of Marsupialia and Afrotheria, and for the total intestine only in Chiroptera.
“Clear diet effects for the total and large intestine were evident in the samples of Marsupialia and Afrotheria, and for the total intestine only (as large intestine data were lacking for this group) in Chiroptera.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Results · p. 8Any trophic proxy increased the data fit for the total intestine, with %faunivory showing the best fit.
“Any trophic proxy increased the data fit for the total intestine, with %faunivory showing the best fit (Table S3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Results · p. 9In PGLS, the model including diet and all three factors had similar support as other models that included diet and being volant; neither being marine nor having a forestomach was significant.
“In PGLS, this model had similar support as other models that included diet and being volant (ΔAIC c < 2); neither being marine nor having a forestomach was significant in these or other PGLS models (Table S6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Results · p. 10For the small intestine, models including diet, being marine and having a forestomach were the best-supported in GLS; both factors were positively related to length.
“For the small intestine, for which hardly any data for bats existed, models including diet, being marine and having a forestomach were the best-supported in GLS (ΔAIC c to nextbest model = 8); both factors were positively related to length.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ Discussion · p. 13Whereas in GLS, having a forestomach was a significant factor for a longer small intestine, this was not significant in PGLS.
“Whereas in GLS, having a forestomach was a significant factor for a longer small intestine, this was not significant in PGLS, most likely because the presence of a forestomach is not evenly distributed across taxa but represents a hallmark of specific taxa [34, 59].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ Discussion · p. 14This positive allometry applied to the small intestine, the colon/rectum, and the summative measures large and total intestine.
“This applied to the small intestine, the colon/rectum, and the summative measures large and total intestine.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data§ Table S2 Summary statistics for allometric scaling as log(y) = a + b log(body mass), or y = (10 a ) BM b (significant parameters in bold ) · p. 31In PGLS models of total intestine length across 519 mammal species, the Trophic90 herbivore category has a positive coefficient of 0.07 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.14) relative to faunivores, controlling for body mass.
“| Trophic90 | -182.3 | 8.1 | 90Herbivore | 0.27 (0.23 to 0.32) | 0.92 (0.87 to 0.95) | -479.1 | 3.3 | 0.07 (0.00 to 0.14) |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ References · p. 28The proportion of readily digestible plant parts or less digestible plant parts did not yield a better data fit and only had a significant effect in GLS but not PGLS.
“The proportion of more readily digestible plant parts (fruits, nectar, seeds), or of the less digestible plant parts (leaves and stems) did not yield a better data fit, and only had a significant effect in GLS but not PGLS (Table S3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Results · p. 8When using only species for which all respective data were available, the small intestine-body mass relationship achieved lower AICc than the large intestine-body mass relationship, or than the caecum-body mass and colon/rectum-body mass relationships.
“When using only species for which all respective data were available, the small intestine-body mass relationship achieved lower AIC c than the large intestine-body mass relationsip (ΔAIC c GLS=357, PGLS =135), or than the caecum-body mass and colon/rectum-body mass relationships (ΔAIC c GLS>308, PGLS>178), suggesting that the large intestine is more subjected to additional influence factors (Table”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Results · p. 9No effect for the total intestine but an effect on the large intestine was observed in Rodentia.
“No effect for the total intestine but an effect on the large intestine was observed in Rodentia.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Discussion · p. 12The fact that there is a diet effect on the total intestinal tract length across all mammals, or within Chiroptera, contrasts with the absence of such an effect in Primates, Carnivora or Artiodactyla.
“The fact that there is a diet effect on the total intestinal tract length across all mammals, or within Chiroptera, contrasts with the absence of such an effect in Primates, Carnivora or Artiodactyla (Table S4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Discussion · p. 13Whereas in GLS, all diet descriptors were significantly related to total intestine length, this was not the case for several of them in PGLS.
“Whereas in GLS, all diet descriptors were significantly related to total intestine length, this was not the case for several of them in PGLS (Table S2), suggesting phylogenetic specialization on either easily digestible or less easily-digestible plant parts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Results · p. 10Latitude was positively related to intestine length, and temperature negatively.
“Latitude was positively related to intestine length (Fig. 3A), and temperature negatively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Results · p. 8The addition of %faunivory yielded a far better data fit (ΔAICc 19-316) for all intestinal sections in GLS; the difference from the model without trophic proxy was least for the small intestine.
“The addition of %faunivory yielded a far better data fit (ΔAIC c 19-316) for all intestinal sections in GLS; the difference from the model without trophic proxy was least for the small intestine (Table S4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data§ Table S2 Summary statistics for allometric scaling as log(y) = a + b log(body mass), or y = (10 a ) BM b (significant parameters in bold ) · p. 31In GLS models of total intestine length across 519 mammal species, the Trophic90 omnivore category has a positive coefficient of 0.15 (95% CI 0.10 to 0.19) relative to faunivores, controlling for body mass.
“| Trophic90 | -182.3 | 8.1 | 90Omnivore | 0.15 (0.10 to 0.19) | 0.92 (0.87 to 0.95) | -479.1 | 3.3 | 0.04 (-0.02 to 0.10) |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ 760 761 · p. 51Most data points in the analysis of small intestinal length and body mass for marine and nonmarine mammals refer to Carnivora.
“Most data points refer to Carnivora”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data§ 724 725 726 · p. 37In Artiodactyla, the diet proxy (%faunivory) is not significantly associated with large intestinal length in GLS models (c = -0.31, 95% CI -0.94 to 0.31).
“| Artiodactyla | Total intest. | BM + %faunivory | 81 | -79.0 | 1.4 | c | -0.31 (-0.94 to 0.31) | 0.38 (NA to NA) | -94.0 | 2.0 | 0.02 (-0.85 to 0.89) |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data§ Table S2 Summary statistics for allometric scaling as log(y) = a + b log(body mass), or y = (10 a ) BM b (significant parameters in bold ) · p. 32In PGLS models of caecum length across 352 mammal species, %faunivory has a negative coefficient of -0.32 (95% CI -0.46 to -0.18), controlling for body mass.
“| | | | | | | b c -0.69 | 0.43 (0.41 to 0.45) (-0.76 to -0.62) | | | | | -0.32 (-0.46 to -0.18) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ 760 761 · p. 51One phocid had a surprisingly short small intestine.
“where one phocid had a surprisingly short small intestine”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ Table S2 Summary statistics for allometric scaling as log(y) = a + b log(body mass), or y = (10 a ) BM b (significant parameters in bold ) · p. 31Among PGLS models of total intestine length with different diet proxies, the Trophic70 model has the lowest AICc (ΔAIC = 0.0).
“| Trophic70 | -181.9 | 8.5 | a | 2.11 (2.08 to 2.15) | 0.92 (0.86 to 0.95) | -482.4 | 0.0 | 2.15 (1.84 to 2.46) |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data§ Table S2 Summary statistics for allometric scaling as log(y) = a + b log(body mass), or y = (10 a ) BM b (significant parameters in bold ) · p. 32In GLS models of caecum length across 352 mammal species, %faunivory has a negative coefficient of -0.69 (95% CI -0.76 to -0.62), controlling for body mass.
“| | | | | | | b c -0.69 | 0.43 (0.41 to 0.45) (-0.76 to -0.62) | | | | | -0.32 (-0.46 to -0.18) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data§ 724 725 726 · p. 35In Eutheria, the diet proxy (%faunivory) has a significant negative association with large intestinal length in GLS models (c = -0.70, 95% CI -0.76 to -0.64).
“| Marsupials | Large intest. | BM + %faunivory | 352 | -72.8 | 0.0 | c | -0.70 (-0.76 to -0.64) | 0.89 (0.80 to 0.94) | -266.2 | 0.0 | -0.31 (-0.43 to -0.20) |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 760 761 · p. 51The two largest species are baleen whales, which have, compared to other Cetartiodactyla, rather short small intestines.
“the two largest species are baleen whales, which have, compared to other Cetartiodactyla, rather short small intestines”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data§ 724 725 726 · p. 35In Boroeutheria, the diet proxy (%faunivory) has a significant negative association with large intestinal length in GLS models (c = -0.73, 95% CI -0.80 to -0.66).
“| Boroeutheria | Total intest. | BM + %faunivory | 453 | -206.2 | 0.0 | | -0.73 (-0.80 to | 0.82 (0.73 to 0.89) | -516.0 | 0.0 | |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data§ 760 761 · p. 51Another short small intestine is from the afrotherian dugong (Dugong dugon).
“another short small intestine is from the afrotherian dugong ( Dugong dugon )”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data§ 724 725 726 · p. 35In Eutheria, the diet proxy (%faunivory) has a significant negative association with total intestinal length in GLS models (c = -0.27, 95% CI -0.31 to -0.22).
“| Marsupials | Total intest. | BM + %faunivory | | -196.0 | 0.0 | c | -0.27 (-0.31 to -0.22) | 0.91 (0.86 to 0.94) | -525.2 | 0.0 | -0.07 (-0.14 to 0.00) |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ Background · p. 4The aridity of the habitat is thought to influence GIT anatomy.
“Other factors than diet thought to influence GIT anatomy include special adaptations to a volant [15, 21, 22] or a marine [23-25] lifestyle, or the aridity of the habitat [16, 26, 27].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [16] 16. McGrosky A., Codron D., Müller D.W.H., Navarrete A., Isler K., Hofmann R.R., Clauss M. 2019 Gross intestinal morphometry and allometry in ruminants. J Morphol 280 , 1254-1266.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [26] 26. Woodall P.F., Skinner J.D. 1993 Dimensions of the intestine, diet and faecal water loss in some African antelope. J Zool 229 , 457-471. source
- cites [27] 27. Cain J.W., Krausman P.R., Rosenstock S.S., Turner J.C. 2006 Mechanisms of thermoregulation and water balance in desert ungulates. Wildl Soc Bull 34 , 570-581. source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ Background · p. 3Mammals consuming highly digestible diets, such as faunivores, do not need complex or long GITs.
“Mammals consuming highly digestible diets, such as faunivores (carnivores, insectivores) do not need complex or long GITs; mammals that feed mainly on vegetable matter, especially on the leaves and stems of grass or browse, require large fermentation chambers to digest plant fibre [5].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Background · p. 4Special adaptations to a marine lifestyle are thought to influence GIT anatomy.
“Other factors than diet thought to influence GIT anatomy include special adaptations to a volant [15, 21, 22] or a marine [23-25] lifestyle, or the aridity of the habitat [16, 26, 27].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [23] 23. McGrosky A., Navarrete A., Isler K., Langer P., Clauss M. 2016 Gross intestinal morphometry and allometry in Carnivora. Eur J Wildl Res 62 , 395-405. source
- cites [24] 24. Mårtensson P.E., Nordoy E.S., Messelt E.B., Blix A.S. 1998 Gut length, food transit time and diving habit in phocid seals. Polar Biology 20 , 213-217. 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 source
- cites [25] 25. Krockenberger M.B., Bryden M.M. 1994 Rate of passage of digesta through the alimentary tract of southern elephant seals ( Mirounga leonina ). J Zool 234 , 229-237. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationown data§ Abstract · p. 2This study corroborates intuitive expectations on digestive tract anatomy.
“This study corroborates intuitive expectations on digestive tract anatomy, while the dependence of significant results on large sample sizes and inclusion of specific taxonomic groups indicates that the relationships cannot be considered fixed biological laws.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ Background · p. 3Mammals that feed mainly on vegetable matter, especially on the leaves and stems of grass or browse, require large fermentation chambers to digest plant fibre.
“Mammals consuming highly digestible diets, such as faunivores (carnivores, insectivores) do not need complex or long GITs; mammals that feed mainly on vegetable matter, especially on the leaves and stems of grass or browse, require large fermentation chambers to digest plant fibre [5].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Discussion · p. 16Forestomachs occur in large mammalian herbivores of various taxa and in muroid rodents.
“Forestomachs do not only occur in large mammalian herbivores of various taxa [59], but also in muroid rodents [34, 69, 70].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [59] 59. Langer P. 1988 The mammalian herbivore stomach . Stuttgart/New York, Gustav Fischer Verlag. 578 579
- cites [34] 34. Langer P. 2017 Comparative anatomy of the gastrointestinal tract in Eutheria: Taxonomy, biogeography and food. Vol I: Afrotheria, Xenarthra and Euarchontoglires. Vol II: Laurasiatheria, general discussion . Berlin, De Gruyter. source
- cites [69] 69. Vorontsov N.N. 1967/1969 Evolution of the alimentary system in rodents . Novosibirsk,
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [70]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Discussion · p. 16The presence of a forestomach follows clear phylogenetic boundaries, explaining the absence of a significant signal in PGLS.
“The presence of a forestomach follows clear phylogenetic boundaries, which explains the absence of a significant signal in PGLS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The presence of a forestomach follows clear phylogenetic boundaries.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ Discussion · p. 11The present study provides a comprehensive data collection on mammalian intestinal length, which corroborates previously stated concepts on intestinal allometric scaling, and intuitive concepts about the relationships between digestive tract anatomy, diet, and environmental aridity.
“The present study provides a comprehensive data collection on mammalian intestinal length, which corroborates previously stated concepts on intestinal allometric scaling, and intuitive concepts about the relationships between digestive tract anatomy, diet, and environmental aridity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ Discussion · p. 11While macroevolutionary trends can be stated, they should not be considered fixed biological laws, and results may depend to a large extent on the size and composition of the investigated sample.
“The scatter evident from plots recommend that while macroevolutionary trends can be stated, they should not be considered fixed biological laws, and that results may depend to a large extent on the size and composition of the investigated sample.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ Results · p. 9Taxa within Eutheria, Boroeutheria, Euarchontoglires and Laurasiatheria differ systematically by total intestine length and diet.
“For the total intestine, the large groups of Eutheria, Boroeutheria, Euarchontoglires and Laurasiatheria showed significant effects of diet in GLS but not PGLS, indicating that taxa within these groups differ systematically by total intestine length and diet.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationown data§ Discussion · p. 12One might question how generalizable a result is that requires such immense sample sizes.
“Although the result of the model using the larger sample size corresponds to our expectations, one might question how generalizable a result is that requires such immense sample sizes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown data§ Results · p. 10The pattern for the small intestine does not appear convincing at visual inspection, being based on rather few species.
“The pattern, however, does not appear convincing at visual inspection, being based on rather few species (Fig. S6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Discussion · p. 15Our results suggest the hypothesis that major constant differences in dietary or humidity niches are mainly reflected in the length of the caecum and colon, whereas differences in the constancy in intake and digestion are reflected in the length of the small intestine.
“Our results suggest the hypothesis that major constant differences in dietary or humidity niches are mainly reflected in the length of the caecum and colon, whereas differences in the constancy in intake and digestion are reflected in the length of the small intestine.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationcitation§ Discussion · p. 16The negative relationship between precipitation/AET and colon length may not be consistent within specific mammal groups.
“even though this pattern may not be consistent within specific mammal groups [18].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] 18. Lovegrove B.G. 2010 The allometry of rodent intestines. J Comp Physiol B 180 , 741-755. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationcitation§ References · p. 28Various details of Chivers and Hladik's work suggest the methods are not robust.
“Various details of this work might lead to the conclusion that the methods are not robust:”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Discussion · p. 13A factor that contributes significantly to variation in GLS, but does not do so in PGLS, is likely distributed unequally across the phylogeny; phylogenetic diversification then reflects the diversity in this factor.
“A factor that contributes significantly to variation in GLS, but does not do so in PGLS, is likely distributed unequally across the phylogeny; phylogenetic diversification then reflects the diversity in this factor.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ Discussion · p. 11Additional, existing concepts on the effect of being a volant or marine species are also supported, and some new findings on associations are provided with having a forestomach, and with the mid-latitude of the species current geographic range.
“Additional, existing concepts on the effect of being a volant or marine species are also supported, and some new findings on associations are provided with having a forestomach, and with the mid-latitude of the species current geographic range.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Discussion · p. 16In birds, the relationship between volant lifestyle and shorter intestines does not necessarily apply to the caecum.
“In birds, this does not necessarily apply to the caecum [72].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [72]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationown data§ Discussion · p. 12It is important to reference the taxonomic level on which a statement is based.
“Our results also indicate that it is important to reference the taxonomic level on which a statement is based.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ Discussion · p. 15It is plausible that in animals that consume higher proportions of plant material, the caecum and proximal colon are generally longer, as documented in the present study, and more complex.
“Therefore, it is plausible that in animals that consume higher proportions of plant material, these sections are generally longer, as documented in the present study, and more complex [20].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] 20. Langer P., Clauss M. 2018 Morphological adaptation of the eutherian gastrointestinal tract to diet. Vertebr Zool 68 , 237-252.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Discussion · p. 13The presence of a forestomach is not evenly distributed across taxa but represents a hallmark of specific taxa, which explains why it was not significant in PGLS.
“Whereas in GLS, having a forestomach was a significant factor for a longer small intestine, this was not significant in PGLS, most likely because the presence of a forestomach is not evenly distributed across taxa but represents a hallmark of specific taxa [34, 59].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [34] 34. Langer P. 2017 Comparative anatomy of the gastrointestinal tract in Eutheria: Taxonomy, biogeography and food. Vol I: Afrotheria, Xenarthra and Euarchontoglires. Vol II: Laurasiatheria, general discussion . Berlin, De Gruyter. source
- cites [59] 59. Langer P. 1988 The mammalian herbivore stomach . Stuttgart/New York, Gustav Fischer Verlag. 578 579
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Discussion · p. 13A relationship that is significant in GLS but not in PGLS shows no convergence across taxa; however, the functional association between the variables should not be discarded based on the PGLS result alone.
“A relationship that is significant in GLS but not in PGLS shows no convergence across taxa; however, the functional association between the variables should not be discarded based on the PGLS result alone.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Discussion · p. 17In seasonal environments, many mammals incur costs of reproduction in the growing season and build up body reserves used in the dormant season.
“In seasonal environments, many mammals have to incur the costs of reproduction in the growing season and also build up body reserves, which are then used in the dormant season [75].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [75]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 760 761 · p. 52The koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) is known to use caecum contents for feeding its young.
“a species that is known to use caecum contents for feeding its young [80]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [80]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
The paper relies on this without support.
The diet of the closest taxonomic relative is a valid proxy for a species' diet when species-specific diet data are missing.
“If a species was not included in that dataset, the diet of the closest taxonomic relative was used.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The digestive action in the small intestine is not related to fibre fermentation but to auto-enzymatic digestion of proteins, fats, and easily digested carbohydrates.
“By contrast, the digestive action in the small intestine is not related to fibre fermentation, but to auto-enzymatic digestion of proteins, fats, and easily digested carbohydrates.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The presence of a forestomach follows clear phylogenetic boundaries.
“The presence of a forestomach follows clear phylogenetic boundaries, which explains the absence of a significant signal in PGLS.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Across mammalian taxa, differences in intestinal length can be explained by diet.
“Across mammalian taxa, differences in intestinal length can be explained by diet.Species that consume higher proportions of plant matter have longer intestines, especially large intestines (Duque-Correa et al. 2021).”
From Digestive anatomy and diet of free-ranging maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus) (2025) · cites this paper as Duque-Correa et al. 2021
Within mammalian taxa, intestinal length is a phylogenetically conserved feature.
“Within mammalian taxa, intestinal length is a phylogenetically conserved feature (Duque-Correa et al. 2021).”
From Digestive anatomy and diet of free-ranging maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus) (2025) · cites this paper as Duque-Correa et al. 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Simulation count differs between supplement text and code
MinorThe Table S1 note says the phylogenetic-signal analyses used 9999 simulations per analysis, while the supplied calls for both K and λ set nsim to 999.
“analyses performed in 'phytools' [46] using 9999 simulations per analysis and log-transformed values”
“phylosig(Tree, trait, method="K", test=TRUE, nsim=999)”
Figure S5 is cited for volant status but captioned for marine status
MinorThe results cite Figure S5A for the volant relationship, but the supplementary caption describes Figure S5 as a small-intestine comparison of marine and nonmarine mammals.
“being volant had a negative relationship with total intestine length in both GLS and PGLS (Fig. S5A)”
“Figure S5 Relationship between small intestinal length and body mass for marine and nonmarine mammals.”
Not all PGLS models have λ above 0.9
MinorThe blanket statement conflicts with several models in Table S5, including a Carnivora large-intestine model with λ = 0.22.
“In all PGLS analyses, there was a strong phylogenetic signal (λ > 0.9)”
“| Carnivora | Large intest. | BM | 40 | -34.6 | 0.0 | | 1.25 (1.18 to 1.32) | 0.22 (na to 0.75)”
Reported Blomberg's K range excludes the caecum
MinorThe results give a K range of 0.58-0.76, but Table S1 reports a caecum-length K of 0.34. The subsequent sentence acknowledges that caecum K is lower, so the stated overall range is incomplete.
“Both Pagel's λ (at values of 0.97 to 0.99) and Blomberg's K (0.58 to 0.76) indicated a distinct phylogenetic pattern in the data”
“| Caecum | 352 | 0.61 | 0.99 | 0.34 | 0.97”
Figure 3 is cited for climate but captioned for biological factors
MinorThe results cite Figure 3A for a latitude relationship, whereas the Figure 3 caption identifies panel A as a comparison of nonvolant and volant mammals.
“Latitude was positively related to intestine length (Fig. 3A), and temperature negatively.”
“Figure 3 Relationships between total intestine length and body mass (A) nonvolant vs. volant 651 mammals, (B) mammals without and with a forestomach.”
Figure S6 is cited for the marine pattern but captioned for caecum length
MinorThe discussion of the marine small-intestine pattern points to Figure S6. Its supplementary caption instead describes caecum length and coprophagy groups.
“The pattern, however, does not appear convincing at visual inspection, being based on rather few species (Fig. S6).”
“Figure S6 Relationship between caecum length and body mass (A) across mammals separated into orders in which coprophagy is a frequent digestive strategy”
Cites
Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach.
Guthery, F. S., Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2003) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802723 · Cited by 41,495 · see citing works
Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L., François, R., Grolemund, G., Hayes, A., Henry, L., Hester, J., et al. (2019) · Journal of Open Source Software · doi:10.21105/joss.01686 · Cited by 22,138 · see citing works
APE: Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution in R language
Paradis, E., Claude, J., & Strimmer, K. (2004) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412 · Cited by 12,037 · see citing works
phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things)
Revell, L. J. (2011) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.2041-210x.2011.00169.x · Cited by 9,143 · see citing works
Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution
Pagel, M. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/44766 · Cited by 5,200 · see citing works
TESTING FOR PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL IN COMPARATIVE DATA: BEHAVIORAL TRAITS ARE MORE LABILE
Blomberg, S. P., Garland, T., & Ives, A. R. (2003) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00285.x · Cited by 4,678 · see citing works
Nowak, R. (2018) · doi:10.1353/book.59141 · Cited by 4,102 · see citing works
Nowak, R. (1999) · doi:10.56021/9780801857898 · Cited by 4,102
Size, Function, and Life History
Calder, W. A. (1984) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,891 · see citing works
Wilman, H., Belmaker, J., Simpson, J., de la Rosa, C., Rivadeneira, M. M., & Jetz, W. (2014) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/13-1917.1 · Cited by 1,994 · see citing works
Jones, K. E., Bielby, J., Cardillo, M., Fritz, S. A., O'Dell, J., Orme, C. D. L., Safi, K., Sechrest, W., Boakes, E. H., Carbone, C., et al. (2009) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/08-1494.1 · Cited by 1,662 · see citing works
Phylogenetic Analysis of Covariance by Computer Simulation
Garland, T., Dickerman, A. W., Janis, C. M., & Jones, J. A. (1993) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/42.3.265 · Cited by 1,238 · see citing works
Upham, N. S., Esselstyn, J. A., & Jetz, W. (2019) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000494 · Cited by 1,203 · see citing works
TESTING FOR PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL IN COMPARATIVE DATA: BEHAVIORAL TRAITS ARE MORE LABILE
Blomberg, S. P., Garland, T., & Ives, A. R. (2003) · Evolution · doi:10.1554/0014-3820(2003)057[0717:tfpsic]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 994 · see citing works
The Mammalian Radiations: An Analysis of Trends in Evolution, Adaptation, and Behavior
Eisenberg, J. F. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 750 · see citing works
Phylogenetic approaches in comparative physiology
Garland, T., Bennett, A. F., & Rezende, E. L. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.01745 · Cited by 692 · see citing works
Seasonality, Fasting Endurance, and Body Size in Mammals
Lindstedt, S. L., & Boyce, M. S. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284385 · Cited by 595 · see citing works
Chivers, D. J., & Hladik, C. M. (1980) · Journal of Morphology · doi:10.1002/jmor.1051660306 · Cited by 593 · see citing works
STEVENS, C. E., & Hume, I. D. (1998) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1998.78.2.393 · Cited by 579 · see citing works
Comparative physiology of the vertebrate digestive system
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-3895 · Cited by 434 · see citing works
The Giant Panda a Morphological Study of Evolutionary Mechanisms
Quay, W. B., & Davis, D. D. (1966) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.2307/1378109 · Cited by 384 · see citing works
Karasov, W. H., & del Rio, C. M. (2007) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691213316 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
Ecological Physiology of Diet and Digestive Systems
Karasov, W. H., del Rio, C. M., & Caviedes‐Vidal, E. (2011) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev-physiol-012110-142152 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
The seven deadly sins of comparative analysis
FRECKLETON, R. P. (2009) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01757.x · Cited by 339 · see citing works
Rethinking phylogenetic comparative methods
Uyeda, J. C., Zenil-Ferguson, R., & Pennell, M. W. (2018) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syy031 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
Lavin, S. R., Karasov, W. H., Ives, A. R., Middleton, K. M., & Garland Jr., T. (2008) · Physiological and Biochemical Zoology · doi:10.1086/590395 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
The giant panda : a morphological study of evolutionary mechanisms / D. Dwight Davis.
Davis, D. D. (1964) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.5133 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Mechanisms of Thermoregulation and Water Balance in Desert Ungulates
CAIN, J. W., KRAUSMAN, P. R., ROSENSTOCK, S. S., & TURNER, J. C. (2006) · Wildlife Society Bulletin · doi:10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[570:motawb]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Sahney, S., Benton, M. J., & Ferry, P. A. (2010) · Biology Letters · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2009.1024 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
What it Takes to Fly: The Structural and Functional Respiratory Refinements in Birds and Bats
Maina, J. N. (2000) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.203.20.3045 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Caviedes-Vidal, E., McWhorter, T. J., Lavin, S. R., Chediack, J. G., Tracy, C. R., & Karasov, W. H. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0703159104 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Coprophagy in leporids and other mammalian herbivores
Hirakawa, H. (2001) · Mammal Review · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2907.2001.00079.x · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Carleton, M. D. (1973) · Deep Blue (University of Michigan) · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Jenkins, P. D., Kilpatrick, C. W., Robinson, M. F., & Timmins, R. J. (2005) · Systematics and Biodiversity · doi:10.1017/s1477200004001549 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Ecological and Environmental Physiology of Mammals
Withers, P. C., Cooper, C. E., Maloney, S. K., et al. (2016) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199642717.001.0001 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Phylogenetic Analysis of Covariance by Computer Simulation
Garland, T., Dickerman, A. W., Janis, C. M., et al. (1993) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.2307/2992464 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Phylogenetic Analyses: Comparing Species to Infer Adaptations and Physiological Mechanisms
Rezende, E. L., & Diniz‐Filho, J. A. F. (2012) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.c100079 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Structure and concentrating ability of the mammalian kidney: correlations with habitat
Beuchat, C. A. (1996) · American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpregu.1996.271.1.r157 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Affording Larger Brains: Testing Hypotheses of Mammalian Brain Evolution on Bats
Jones, K. E., & MacLarnon, A. M. (2004) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/421334 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Bergmann′s rule in mammals: a cross‐species interspecific pattern
Clauß, M., Dittmann, M. T., Müller, D. W. H., Meloro, C., & Codron, D. (2013) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.00463.x · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Self-citationPerrin, M. R., & Curtis, B. A. (1980) · South African Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1080/02541858.1980.11447680 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Naya, D. E., Bozinovic, F., & Karasov, W. H. (2008) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/590957 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Digestive Adaptations of Aerial Lifestyles
Price, E. R., Brun, A., Caviedes-Vidal, E., & Karasov, W. H. (2015) · Physiology · doi:10.1152/physiol.00020.2014 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Fitting statistical models in bivariate allometry
Packard, G. C., Birchard, G. F., & Boardman, T. J. (2010) · Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2010.00160.x · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Dimensions of the intestine, diet and faecal water loss in some African antelope
Woodall, P. F., & Skinner, J. D. (1993) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1993.tb02648.x · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Stomach contents and gastro‐intestinal proportions in wild‐shot guianan monkeys
Fooden, J. (1964) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330220243 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
(1988) · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Cuyper, A. D., Clauß, M., Carbone, C., Codron, D., Cools, A., Hesta, M., & Janssens, G. P. J. (2018) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/oik.05488 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Self-citationMorphological and Physiological Adaptations for Browsing and Grazing
Codron, D., Hofmann, R. R., & Clauß, M. (2019) · Ecological studies · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-25865-8_4 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Self-citationColonic Separation Mechanism in Lagomorph and Rodent Species - a Comparison
Björnhag, G., & Snipes, R. L. (2008) · Zoosystematics and Evolution · doi:10.1002/mmnz.19990750208 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Clauss, M., Dittmann, M. T., Müller, D. W. H., Zerbe, P., & Codron, D. (2014) · Mammalian Biology · doi:10.1016/j.mambio.2013.01.002 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Self-citationMorphological evolution of the mammalian cecum and cecal appendix
Smith, H. F., Parker, W., Kotzé, S. H., & Laurin, M. (2017) · Comptes Rendus Palevol · doi:10.1016/j.crpv.2016.06.001 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
phytools: Phylogenetic Tools for Comparative Biology (and Other Things)
Revell, L. J. (2011) · doi:10.32614/cran.package.phytools · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Gross intestinal morphometry and allometry in Carnivora
McGrosky, A., Navarrete, A., Isler, K., Langer, P., & Clauss, M. (2016) · European Journal of Wildlife Research · doi:10.1007/s10344-016-1011-3 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citationKrockenberger, M. B., & Bryden, M. M. (1994) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1994.tb06071.x · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Clauß, M., Zerbe, P., Lackey, L. B., Codron, D., & Müller, D. W. H. (2020) · Mammalian Biology · doi:10.1007/s42991-020-00078-y · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Self-citationHagen, K. B., Tschudin, A., Liesegang, A., Hatt, J., & Clauß, M. (2015) · Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition · doi:10.1111/jpn.12323 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Carbone, C., Codron, D., Scofield, C., Clauß, M., & Bielby, J. (2014) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12375 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationGut length, food transit time and diving habit in phocid seals
Mårtensson, P.-E., Nordøy, E. S., Messelt, E. B., & Blix, A. S. (1998) · Polar Biology · doi:10.1007/s003000050298 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Clauß, M., Besselmann, D., Schwarm, A., et al. (2007) · Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A Molecular & Integrative Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2007.01.013 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Phylogeny and herbivory are related to avian cecal size
Hunt, A., Al‐Nakkash, L., Lee, A. H., & Smith, H. F. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-40822-0 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Morphological adaptation of the eutherian gastrointestinaltract to diet
Langer, P. H., & Clauß, M. (2018) · Vertebrate Zoology · doi:10.3897/vz.68.e31612 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
The allometry of rodent intestines
Lovegrove, B. G. (2010) · Journal of Comparative Physiology B · doi:10.1007/s00360-009-0437-2 · Cited by 27 · cited 4× · see citing works
“81 82 Methods 83 Relevant publications were collated using published datasets [15-18, 23] as starting points, 84 and traced back to the original articles cited in the publications.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialKorn, H. (1992) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1992.tb04448.x · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Makanya, A. N., Maina, J. N., Mayhew, T. M., et al. (1997) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.200.18.2415 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Supplement: coprophagy in leporids and other mammalian herbivores
Hirakawa, H. (2002) · Mammal Review · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2907.2002.00105.x · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Gross intestinal morphometry and allometry in primates
McGrosky, A., Meloro, C., Navarrete, A. F., Heldstab, S. A., Kitchener, A. C., Isler, K., & Clauß, M. (2019) · American Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1002/ajp.23035 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationExploring the Evolution of the Basal Metabolic Rate in Bats
Cruz-Neto, A. P., & Jones, K. E. (2006) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195154726.003.0004 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Tahas, S. A., Jurado, O. M., Hammer, S., et al. (2017) · Anatomia Histologia Embryologia · doi:10.1111/ahe.12268 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Neue Aufgaben für den Appendix
(2017) · DMW - Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift · doi:10.1055/s-0042-123989 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Reconstruction of body cavity volume in terrestrial tetrapods
Clauß, M., Nurutdinova, I., Meloro, C., Gunga, H., Jiang, D., Koller, J., Herkner, B., Sander, P. M., & Hellwich, O. (2016) · Journal of Anatomy · doi:10.1111/joa.12557 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationGross intestinal morphometry and allometry in ruminants
McGrosky, A., Codron, D., Müller, D. W. H., Navarrete, A. F., Isler, K., Hofmann, R. R., & Clauß, M. (2019) · Journal of Morphology · doi:10.1002/jmor.21028 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citationEhrlich, C., Codron, D., Hofmann, R. R., et al. (2019) · Journal of Morphology · doi:10.1002/jmor.20942 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationOsawa, R., & Woodall, P. (1992) · Australian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1071/zo9920099 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Morphological adaptation of the eutherian gastrointestinal tract to diet
Langer, P. H., & Clauß, M. (2018) · Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) · doi:10.5167/uzh-157906 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Richard, O. K., Codron, D., Hagen, K. B., Südekum, K. ‐., & Clauss, M. (2017) · Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition · doi:10.1111/jpn.12657 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationClauß, M., Trümpler, J., Ackermans, N. L., Kitchener, A. C., Hantke, G., Stagegaard, J., Takano, T., Shintaku, Y., & Matsuda, I. (2020) · Primates · doi:10.1007/s10329-020-00873-8 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Feeding Adaptation of Alimentary Tract Length in Arboreal Squirrels
Mitsuzuka, W., & Oshida, T. (2018) · Mammal Study · doi:10.3106/ms2017-0079 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Henke, Z., Sahd, L., Matthee, S., et al. (2018) · Journal of Morphology · doi:10.1002/jmor.20856 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Laonastes aenigmamus, rongeur énigmatique, récemment découvert au Laos
Keovichit, K., Nicolas, V., & Hugot, J.-P. (2011) · Bulletin de l Académie vétérinaire de France · doi:10.4267/2042/48080 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Clauss, M., Trümpler, J., Ackermans, N. L., et al. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.07.16.206201
Self-citationRethinking phylogenetic comparative methods
Uyeda, J. C., Zenil-Ferguson, R., & Pennell, M. W. (2017) · doi:10.1101/222729
Colonic Separation Mechanism in Lagomorph and Rodent Species — a Comparison
Björnhag, G., & Snipes, R. L. (1999) · Mitteilungen aus dem Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin. Zoologische Reihe · doi:10.1002/mmnz.4850750208
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Orr RT, 1976, Vertebrate biology
- Vorontsov NN, 1967, /1969 evolution of the alimentary system in rodents
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Diet and habitat as determinants of intestine length in fishes
Duque‐Correa, M. J., Clements, K. D., Meloro, C., Ronco, F., Boila, A., Indermaur, A., Salzburger, W., & Clauß, M. (2024) · Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries · doi:10.1007/s11160-024-09853-3 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationDiet, habitat and flight characteristics correlate with intestine length in birds
Duque‐Correa, M. J., Clauß, M., Hoppe, M. I., Buyse, K., Codron, D., Meloro, C., & Edwards, M. S. (2022) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2022.0675 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationMurphy, E. L., Baechler, B. R., Roman, L., Leonard, G. H., Mallos, N. J., Santos, R. G. D., & Rochman, C. M. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2415492122 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Teeth and the gastrointestinal tract in mammals: when 1 + 1 = 3
Clauß, M., Fritz, J., & Hummel, J. (2023) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2022.0544 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Thiamin (vitamin B1, thiamine) transfer in the aquatic food web from lower to higher trophic levels
Hylander, S., Farnelid, H., Fridolfsson, E., Hauber, M. M., Todisco, V., Ejsmond, M. J., & Lindehoff, E. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0308844 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Less need for differentiation? Intestinal length of reptiles as compared to mammals
Hoppe, M. I., Meloro, C., Edwards, M. S., Codron, D., Clauß, M., & Duque‐Correa, M. J. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0253182 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationCao, X., van Putten, J. P. M., & Wösten, M. M. S. M. (2023) · Gut Microbes · doi:10.1080/19490976.2023.2262592 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Does intestine length explain digesta retention times in birds and mammals?
Duque‐Correa, M. J., Clauß, M., Meloro, C., et al. (2024) · Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A Molecular & Integrative Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2024.111789 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citationYawitz, T. A., Barts, N., & Kohl, K. D. (2022) · Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A Molecular & Integrative Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2022.111265 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Karasov, W. H., Kohl, K. D., & Caviedes‐Vidal, E. (2025) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.250395 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
No news from old drawings? Stomach anatomy in muroid rodents in relation to body size and ecology
Steiner, N., Clauß, M., Martin, L. F., et al. (2022) · Journal of Morphology · doi:10.1002/jmor.21496 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citationAnatomical shifts linked with unusual diets in deep‐sea snails
Chen, C., Watanabe, H., Gena, K., et al. (2022) · Ecology · doi:10.1002/ecy.3847 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Seasonal and sex-specific changes in the gastrointestinal tracts of Peromyscus maniculatus
Chapman, O. S., & McLean, B. S. (2023) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyad086 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Barts, N., Trevelline, B. K., Dearing, M. D., Martínez‐Mota, R., Pasch, B. S., & Kohl, K. D. (2025) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.249794 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Buskirk, S. W. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192863249.003.0002 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Abraham, J. O., Lin, B., Miller, A., Henry, L. P., Demmel, M. Y., Warungu, R., Mwangi, M., Lobura, P. M., Pallares, L. F., Ayroles, J. F., et al. (2024) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.17370 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Anatomical description of neornithine stomach with implications on neornithine stomach morphology
Takasaki, R., & Kobayashi, Y. (2024) · Journal of Anatomy · doi:10.1111/joa.14123 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Vianello, S., Lin, C.-Y., Pinem, W. C., Li, H.-R., Li, K.-L., Sonia, G., Lee, S., Wu, S., Laudet, V., Su, Y., et al. (2026) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003571 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Gerussi, T., Graïc, J., Orekhova, K., et al. (2024) · Journal of Anatomy · doi:10.1111/joa.13989 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Digestive anatomy and diet of free-ranging maned wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus)
Silva, B. C., de Oliveira, L. A., Clauss, M., Costa, C. G., de Oliveira Marques Alexandre, L., & Duque-Correa, M. J. (2025) · Mammalian Biology · doi:10.1007/s42991-025-00493-z · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Within mammalian taxa, intestinal length is a phylogenetically conserved feature (Duque-Correa et al. 2021).”
InfluentialSelf-citationThe ins and outs of integrative digestive biology
Bucking, C., Terblanche, J. S., & Regan, M. D. (2025) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.250770 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Comparative gastrointestinal organ lengths among Amazonian primates (Primates: Platyrrhini)
Jesus, A. D. S., Bizri, H. R. E., Fa, J. E., Valsecchi, J., Rabelo, R. M., & Mayor, P. (2023) · American Journal of Biological Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.24751 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Gut length evolved under sexual conflict in Lake Malawi cichlids
Baez, A. C., Ciccotto, P. J., Moore, E. C., Peterson, E. N., Lamm, M. S., Roberts, N. B., Coyle, K. P., Barker, M. K., Dickson, E., Cass, A. N., et al. (2025) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/iyaf102 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Commisso, G., Burns, M. D., & Dillman, C. B. (2025) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1093/biolinnean/blaf038 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Duque‐Correa, M. J., Meloro, C., Keller, S., Cigler, P., Wethli, I., Niehaus, J., Przybyło, M., & Clauß, M. (2026) · Journal of Morphology · doi:10.1002/jmor.70130 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationChapman, O. S., & McLean, B. S. (2026) · Integrative and Comparative Biology · doi:10.1093/icb/icag070 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Deconstructing the common anteroposterior organisation of adult bilaterian gutsPreprint
Vianello, S., Lin, C., Pinem, W. C., Li, H.-R., Li, K.-L., Sonia, G., Lee, S., Wu, S., Laudet, V., Su, Y., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.07.02.662275 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Rosero-Taramuel, J. L., Arboleda-Osorio, J. J., Guerrero-Diaz, A. F., Jimenez Anacona, F. D., Matabanchoy-C, K., Pisso-Florez, G. A., & Ramírez-Chaves, H. E. (2026) · Notas sobre Mamíferos Sudamericanos · doi:10.31687/saremnms26.1305
Locating, Obtaining, Ingesting, and Digesting Food
Ritchison, G. (2023) · Fascinating life sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-14852-1_5
Masiuk, D. M., Nedzvetsky, V. S., & Кокарєв, А. В. (2023) · doi:10.30525/978-9934-26-395-8-15
Masiuk, D. M., Nedzvetsky, V. S., & Кокарєв, А. В. (2023) · doi:10.30525/978-9934-26-395-8-14
Trophic level associated gut length divergence evolved under sexual conflict in Lake Malawi cichlidsPreprint
Baez, A. C., Ciccotto, P. J., Moore, E. C., Peterson, E. N., Lamm, M. S., Roberts, N. B., Coyle, K. P., Barker, M. K., Dickson, E., Cass, A. N., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.12.09.627601
Phenotypic and developmental dissection of an instance of the island rule
Nolte, M. J., & Payseur, B. A. (2025) · Evolution · doi:10.1093/evolut/qpaf053
Stepanov, V., Berezina, Y. A., Bespyatykh, O. Y., Syutkina, A. S., Kibardin, M. S., & Domsky, I. (2025) · Genetics and breeding of animals · doi:10.31043/2410-2733-2025-2-77-85
Zhang, Y. K., Iskandar, M. M., Kubow, S. J., Komarova, S. V., & Tauer, J. T. (2026) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-026-47221-2
Feeding biomechanics in vertebrates and beyond
Böhmer, C., & Winkler, D. (2026) · The Anatomical Record · doi:10.1002/ar.70290
Li, X., Wang, T., Gao, F., et al. (2026) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syag067
Abraham, J. O., Leventis, R., Titcomb, G., et al. (2026) · Biology Letters · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2026.0248
Barrionuevo, J. S., & Lavilla, E. O. (2026) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/jzo.70170
Duque‐Correa, M. J., Fages, A., Dervas, E., Tzika, A. C., Minguer‐Balderas, M. J., Huyghe, C. E. T., Salzburger, W., Tschopp, P., & Clauß, M. (2026) · Integrative Zoology · doi:10.1111/1749-4877.70219
Self-citation
- Authors
- Duque-Correa, M. J., Codron, D., Meloro, C., McGrosky, A., Schiffmann, C., Edwards, M. S., & Clauss, M.
- Affiliations
- Clinic for Zoo Animals, Exotic Pets and Wildlife, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstr. 260, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland
- University of the Free State (ZA)
- Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
- Arizona State University (US)
- University of Zurich (CH)
- California Polytechnic State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Clauss, Marcus
- ORCID
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2021-02-10
- Volume
- 288
- Issue
- 1944
- Pages
- 20202888
- ISSN
- 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
- 0962-8452
- 1471-2954
- PMC
- PMC7893215
- OpenAlex
- W3126478460
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 2.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Liverpool John Moores University (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- DRYAD (public-domain)
- Funders
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (CRSII5_189970 / 1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
- Keywords
- allometry, phylogenetic signal, trophic levels, herbivory, diet digestibility, climate, latitude, small intestine
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Diet, Digestion, Intestines, Mammals, Phylogeny, Gastrointestinal Tract
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-26.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-26.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review