Cited by 35Video Surveillance and Tracking MethodsAutonomous Vehicle Technology and SafetyAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Online multi-object tracking with pedestrian re-identification and occlusion processing

Zhang, Xueqin, Wang, Xiaoxiao, Gu, Chunhua·2021·The Visual Computer

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00371-020-01854-0

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, X., Wang, X., & Gu, C.
Affiliations
East China University of Science and Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Xueqin
Venue
The Visual Computer
Published
2020-05-30
Volume
37
Issue
5
Pages
1089-1099
ISSN
  • 0178-2789 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-2315
OpenAlex
W3029588579
Cited by
35
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Visual Computer (publishedVersion)
Funders
Shanghai Aerospace Science and Technology Innovation Fund (SAST2018-086)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
online multi-object tracking, person re-identification, occlusion handling, tracking-by-detection, real-time tracking, MOT16

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review